syzbot |
sign-in | mailing list | source | docs |
| Kernel | Title | Rank 🛈 | Repro | Cause bisect | Fix bisect | Count | Last | Reported | Patched | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| linux-6.1 | possible deadlock in ntfs_read_folio origin:upstream missing-backport | 4 | C | unreliable | 163 | 20h14m | 898d | 0/3 | upstream: reported C repro on 2023/03/14 17:51 | |
| upstream | possible deadlock in ntfs_read_folio ntfs3 | 4 | C | inconclusive | done | 5558 | 32d | 1063d | 0/29 | upstream: reported C repro on 2022/10/01 13:48 |
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
syzkaller #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
kworker/u4:5/986 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff888059d60940 (&rl->lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: ntfs_read_block fs/ntfs/aops.c:248 [inline]
ffff888059d60940 (&rl->lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: ntfs_read_folio+0x144d/0x2980 fs/ntfs/aops.c:436
but task is already holding lock:
ffff888059d63310 (&ni->mrec_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: map_mft_record+0x50/0x650 fs/ntfs/mft.c:154
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (&ni->mrec_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:603 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x129/0xcc0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:747
map_mft_record+0x50/0x650 fs/ntfs/mft.c:154
ntfs_truncate+0x28a/0x28a0 fs/ntfs/inode.c:2383
ntfs_truncate_vfs fs/ntfs/inode.c:2863 [inline]
ntfs_setattr+0x34a/0x430 fs/ntfs/inode.c:2915
notify_change+0xb0d/0xe10 fs/attr.c:499
do_truncate+0x19b/0x220 fs/open.c:66
handle_truncate fs/namei.c:3291 [inline]
do_open fs/namei.c:3636 [inline]
path_openat+0x298c/0x3190 fs/namei.c:3789
do_filp_open+0x1c5/0x3d0 fs/namei.c:3816
do_sys_openat2+0x12c/0x1c0 fs/open.c:1419
do_sys_open fs/open.c:1434 [inline]
__do_sys_openat fs/open.c:1450 [inline]
__se_sys_openat fs/open.c:1445 [inline]
__x64_sys_openat+0x139/0x160 fs/open.c:1445
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x55/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:81
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x68/0xd2
-> #0 (&rl->lock){++++}-{3:3}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x2ddb/0x7c80 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
lock_acquire+0x197/0x410 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
down_read+0x46/0x2e0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1520
ntfs_read_block fs/ntfs/aops.c:248 [inline]
ntfs_read_folio+0x144d/0x2980 fs/ntfs/aops.c:436
filemap_read_folio+0x167/0x760 mm/filemap.c:2420
do_read_cache_folio+0x470/0x7e0 mm/filemap.c:3789
do_read_cache_page+0x32/0x250 mm/filemap.c:3855
read_mapping_page include/linux/pagemap.h:892 [inline]
ntfs_map_page fs/ntfs/aops.h:75 [inline]
ntfs_sync_mft_mirror+0x236/0x1aa0 fs/ntfs/mft.c:480
write_mft_record_nolock+0x116f/0x18c0 fs/ntfs/mft.c:787
write_mft_record+0x136/0x300 fs/ntfs/mft.h:95
__ntfs_write_inode+0x731/0xc00 fs/ntfs/inode.c:3051
write_inode fs/fs-writeback.c:1473 [inline]
__writeback_single_inode+0x705/0xee0 fs/fs-writeback.c:1690
writeback_sb_inodes+0x77c/0xef0 fs/fs-writeback.c:1916
wb_writeback+0x450/0xba0 fs/fs-writeback.c:2095
wb_do_writeback fs/fs-writeback.c:2242 [inline]
wb_workfn+0x3ff/0xe20 fs/fs-writeback.c:2282
process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:2634 [inline]
process_scheduled_works+0xa45/0x15b0 kernel/workqueue.c:2711
worker_thread+0xa55/0xfc0 kernel/workqueue.c:2792
kthread+0x2fa/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:388
ret_from_fork+0x48/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:152
ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:293
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&ni->mrec_lock);
lock(&rl->lock);
lock(&ni->mrec_lock);
rlock(&rl->lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
3 locks held by kworker/u4:5/986:
#0: ffff88801a27f138 ((wq_completion)writeback){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:2609 [inline]
#0: ffff88801a27f138 ((wq_completion)writeback){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_scheduled_works+0x957/0x15b0 kernel/workqueue.c:2711
#1: ffffc90004297d00 ((work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:2609 [inline]
#1: ffffc90004297d00 ((work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_scheduled_works+0x957/0x15b0 kernel/workqueue.c:2711
#2: ffff888059d63310 (&ni->mrec_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: map_mft_record+0x50/0x650 fs/ntfs/mft.c:154
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 986 Comm: kworker/u4:5 Not tainted syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 08/14/2025
Workqueue: writeback wb_workfn (flush-7:1)
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x16c/0x230 lib/dump_stack.c:106
check_noncircular+0x2bd/0x3c0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2187
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x2ddb/0x7c80 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
lock_acquire+0x197/0x410 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
down_read+0x46/0x2e0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1520
ntfs_read_block fs/ntfs/aops.c:248 [inline]
ntfs_read_folio+0x144d/0x2980 fs/ntfs/aops.c:436
filemap_read_folio+0x167/0x760 mm/filemap.c:2420
do_read_cache_folio+0x470/0x7e0 mm/filemap.c:3789
do_read_cache_page+0x32/0x250 mm/filemap.c:3855
read_mapping_page include/linux/pagemap.h:892 [inline]
ntfs_map_page fs/ntfs/aops.h:75 [inline]
ntfs_sync_mft_mirror+0x236/0x1aa0 fs/ntfs/mft.c:480
write_mft_record_nolock+0x116f/0x18c0 fs/ntfs/mft.c:787
write_mft_record+0x136/0x300 fs/ntfs/mft.h:95
__ntfs_write_inode+0x731/0xc00 fs/ntfs/inode.c:3051
write_inode fs/fs-writeback.c:1473 [inline]
__writeback_single_inode+0x705/0xee0 fs/fs-writeback.c:1690
writeback_sb_inodes+0x77c/0xef0 fs/fs-writeback.c:1916
wb_writeback+0x450/0xba0 fs/fs-writeback.c:2095
wb_do_writeback fs/fs-writeback.c:2242 [inline]
wb_workfn+0x3ff/0xe20 fs/fs-writeback.c:2282
process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:2634 [inline]
process_scheduled_works+0xa45/0x15b0 kernel/workqueue.c:2711
worker_thread+0xa55/0xfc0 kernel/workqueue.c:2792
kthread+0x2fa/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:388
ret_from_fork+0x48/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:152
ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:293
</TASK>
ntfs: (device loop1): ntfs_write_block(): Writing beyond initialized size is not supported yet. Sorry.
| Time | Kernel | Commit | Syzkaller | Config | Log | Report | Syz repro | C repro | VM info | Assets (help?) | Manager | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025/08/29 12:48 | linux-6.6.y | cc1a1c5b404a | 3e1beec6 | .config | console log | report | info | [disk image] [vmlinux] [kernel image] | ci2-linux-6-6-kasan | possible deadlock in ntfs_read_folio |