syz.0.0: attempt to access beyond end of device loop0: rw=0, sector=12551, nr_sectors = 1 limit=64 Buffer I/O error on dev loop0, logical block 12551, async page read syz.0.0: attempt to access beyond end of device loop0: rw=0, sector=12552, nr_sectors = 1 limit=64 Buffer I/O error on dev loop0, logical block 12552, async page read syz.0.0: attempt to access beyond end of device loop0: rw=0, sector=12553, nr_sectors = 1 limit=64 Buffer I/O error on dev loop0, logical block 12553, async page read syz.0.0: attempt to access beyond end of device loop0: rw=0, sector=12554, nr_sectors = 1 limit=64 Buffer I/O error on dev loop0, logical block 12554, async page read ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.16.0-syzkaller-11241-g186f3edfdd41 #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz.0.0/5356 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88801222e0b0 (&tree->tree_lock/1){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: hfs_find_init+0x184/0x200 fs/hfs/bfind.c:-1 but task is already holding lock: ffff888039760778 (&HFS_I(tree->inode)->extents_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: hfs_extend_file+0xda/0x1230 fs/hfs/extent.c:397 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&HFS_I(tree->inode)->extents_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}: lock_acquire+0x120/0x360 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5868 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:598 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x187/0x1360 kernel/locking/mutex.c:760 hfs_extend_file+0xda/0x1230 fs/hfs/extent.c:397 hfs_bmap_reserve+0x107/0x430 fs/hfs/btree.c:269 __hfs_ext_write_extent+0x1fa/0x470 fs/hfs/extent.c:121 __hfs_ext_cache_extent+0x6b/0x9b0 fs/hfs/extent.c:174 hfs_ext_read_extent fs/hfs/extent.c:202 [inline] hfs_extend_file+0x316/0x1230 fs/hfs/extent.c:401 hfs_get_block+0x3d7/0xbd0 fs/hfs/extent.c:353 __block_write_begin_int+0x6b2/0x1900 fs/buffer.c:2145 block_write_begin fs/buffer.c:2256 [inline] cont_write_begin+0x789/0xb50 fs/buffer.c:2594 hfs_write_begin+0x66/0xb0 fs/hfs/inode.c:52 cont_expand_zero fs/buffer.c:2522 [inline] cont_write_begin+0x2fa/0xb50 fs/buffer.c:2584 hfs_write_begin+0x66/0xb0 fs/hfs/inode.c:52 generic_perform_write+0x2c2/0x900 mm/filemap.c:4175 generic_file_write_iter+0x117/0x550 mm/filemap.c:4318 new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:593 [inline] vfs_write+0x54b/0xa90 fs/read_write.c:686 ksys_pwrite64 fs/read_write.c:793 [inline] __do_sys_pwrite64 fs/read_write.c:801 [inline] __se_sys_pwrite64 fs/read_write.c:798 [inline] __x64_sys_pwrite64+0x193/0x220 fs/read_write.c:798 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xfa/0x3b0 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f -> #0 (&tree->tree_lock/1){+.+.}-{4:4}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3165 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3284 [inline] validate_chain+0xb9b/0x2140 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3908 __lock_acquire+0xab9/0xd20 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5237 lock_acquire+0x120/0x360 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5868 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:598 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x187/0x1360 kernel/locking/mutex.c:760 hfs_find_init+0x184/0x200 fs/hfs/bfind.c:-1 hfs_ext_read_extent fs/hfs/extent.c:200 [inline] hfs_extend_file+0x2ee/0x1230 fs/hfs/extent.c:401 hfs_bmap_reserve+0x107/0x430 fs/hfs/btree.c:269 hfs_cat_create+0x1b3/0x640 fs/hfs/catalog.c:104 hfs_create+0x66/0xe0 fs/hfs/dir.c:202 lookup_open fs/namei.c:3708 [inline] open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3807 [inline] path_openat+0x14f1/0x3830 fs/namei.c:4043 do_filp_open+0x1fa/0x410 fs/namei.c:4073 do_sys_openat2+0x121/0x1c0 fs/open.c:1435 do_sys_open fs/open.c:1450 [inline] __do_sys_openat fs/open.c:1466 [inline] __se_sys_openat fs/open.c:1461 [inline] __x64_sys_openat+0x138/0x170 fs/open.c:1461 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xfa/0x3b0 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&HFS_I(tree->inode)->extents_lock); lock(&tree->tree_lock/1); lock(&HFS_I(tree->inode)->extents_lock); lock(&tree->tree_lock/1); *** DEADLOCK *** 4 locks held by syz.0.0/5356: #0: ffff88801222c428 (sb_writers#12){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write+0x41/0x90 fs/namespace.c:557 #1: ffff888039760fa0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#8){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:869 [inline] #1: ffff888039760fa0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#8){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3804 [inline] #1: ffff888039760fa0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#8){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: path_openat+0x8da/0x3830 fs/namei.c:4043 #2: ffff8880118680b0 (&tree->tree_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: hfs_find_init+0x184/0x200 fs/hfs/bfind.c:-1 #3: ffff888039760778 (&HFS_I(tree->inode)->extents_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: hfs_extend_file+0xda/0x1230 fs/hfs/extent.c:397 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5356 Comm: syz.0.0 Not tainted 6.16.0-syzkaller-11241-g186f3edfdd41 #0 PREEMPT(full) Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x189/0x250 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_circular_bug+0x2ee/0x310 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2043 check_noncircular+0x134/0x160 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2175 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3165 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3284 [inline] validate_chain+0xb9b/0x2140 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3908 __lock_acquire+0xab9/0xd20 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5237 lock_acquire+0x120/0x360 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5868 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:598 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x187/0x1360 kernel/locking/mutex.c:760 hfs_find_init+0x184/0x200 fs/hfs/bfind.c:-1 hfs_ext_read_extent fs/hfs/extent.c:200 [inline] hfs_extend_file+0x2ee/0x1230 fs/hfs/extent.c:401 hfs_bmap_reserve+0x107/0x430 fs/hfs/btree.c:269 hfs_cat_create+0x1b3/0x640 fs/hfs/catalog.c:104 hfs_create+0x66/0xe0 fs/hfs/dir.c:202 lookup_open fs/namei.c:3708 [inline] open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3807 [inline] path_openat+0x14f1/0x3830 fs/namei.c:4043 do_filp_open+0x1fa/0x410 fs/namei.c:4073 do_sys_openat2+0x121/0x1c0 fs/open.c:1435 do_sys_open fs/open.c:1450 [inline] __do_sys_openat fs/open.c:1466 [inline] __se_sys_openat fs/open.c:1461 [inline] __x64_sys_openat+0x138/0x170 fs/open.c:1461 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xfa/0x3b0 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7f1ba858eb69 Code: ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 a8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007f1ba943b038 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000101 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f1ba87b6080 RCX: 00007f1ba858eb69 RDX: 000000000016a042 RSI: 00002000000006c0 RDI: ffffffffffffff9c RBP: 00007f1ba8611df1 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 000000000000000c R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007f1ba87b6080 R15: 00007fffc9290928 syz.0.0: attempt to access beyond end of device loop0: rw=0, sector=12551, nr_sectors = 1 limit=64 Buffer I/O error on dev loop0, logical block 12551, async page read syz.0.0: attempt to access beyond end of device loop0: rw=0, sector=12552, nr_sectors = 1 limit=64 Buffer I/O error on dev loop0, logical block 12552, async page read