loop5: detected capacity change from 0 to 1024 ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.1.33-syzkaller #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz-executor.5/24513 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8880807f80b0 (&tree->tree_lock/2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hfsplus_find_init+0x146/0x1c0 but task is already holding lock: ffff888076d560b0 (&tree->tree_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hfsplus_find_init+0x146/0x1c0 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (&tree->tree_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: lock_acquire+0x1f8/0x5a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5669 __mutex_lock_common+0x1d4/0x2520 kernel/locking/mutex.c:603 __mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 [inline] mutex_lock_nested+0x17/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:799 hfsplus_file_truncate+0x80d/0xb40 fs/hfsplus/extents.c:595 hfsplus_setattr+0x1b9/0x280 fs/hfsplus/inode.c:269 notify_change+0xdcd/0x1080 fs/attr.c:482 do_truncate+0x21c/0x300 fs/open.c:65 vfs_truncate+0x2dd/0x3a0 fs/open.c:111 do_sys_truncate+0xda/0x190 fs/open.c:134 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd -> #1 (&HFSPLUS_I(inode)->extents_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: lock_acquire+0x1f8/0x5a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5669 __mutex_lock_common+0x1d4/0x2520 kernel/locking/mutex.c:603 __mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 [inline] mutex_lock_nested+0x17/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:799 hfsplus_get_block+0x37f/0x14e0 fs/hfsplus/extents.c:260 block_read_full_folio+0x403/0xf60 fs/buffer.c:2271 filemap_read_folio+0x199/0x780 mm/filemap.c:2407 do_read_cache_folio+0x2ee/0x810 mm/filemap.c:3535 do_read_cache_page+0x32/0x220 mm/filemap.c:3577 read_mapping_page include/linux/pagemap.h:756 [inline] __hfs_bnode_create+0x483/0x770 fs/hfsplus/bnode.c:440 hfsplus_bnode_find+0x233/0x10b0 fs/hfsplus/bnode.c:486 hfsplus_brec_find+0x17f/0x570 fs/hfsplus/bfind.c:183 __hfsplus_getxattr+0x360/0xb10 fs/hfsplus/xattr.c:522 hfsplus_getxattr+0x98/0xd0 fs/hfsplus/xattr.c:590 vfs_getxattr_alloc+0x449/0x590 fs/xattr.c:380 ima_read_xattr+0x35/0x60 security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c:228 process_measurement+0xe38/0x1cf0 security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c:319 ima_file_check+0xed/0x170 security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c:520 do_open fs/namei.c:3559 [inline] path_openat+0x2687/0x2e60 fs/namei.c:3714 do_filp_open+0x230/0x480 fs/namei.c:3741 do_sys_openat2+0x13b/0x500 fs/open.c:1318 do_sys_open fs/open.c:1334 [inline] __do_sys_openat fs/open.c:1350 [inline] __se_sys_openat fs/open.c:1345 [inline] __x64_sys_openat+0x243/0x290 fs/open.c:1345 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd -> #0 (&tree->tree_lock/2){+.+.}-{3:3}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3098 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3217 [inline] validate_chain+0x1667/0x58e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3832 __lock_acquire+0x125b/0x1f80 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5056 lock_acquire+0x1f8/0x5a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5669 __mutex_lock_common+0x1d4/0x2520 kernel/locking/mutex.c:603 __mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 [inline] mutex_lock_nested+0x17/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:799 hfsplus_find_init+0x146/0x1c0 hfsplus_delete_all_attrs+0x107/0x3c0 fs/hfsplus/attributes.c:366 hfsplus_delete_cat+0xb83/0xfb0 fs/hfsplus/catalog.c:425 hfsplus_rmdir+0xf1/0x1b0 fs/hfsplus/dir.c:425 vfs_rmdir+0x35b/0x4b0 fs/namei.c:4121 do_rmdir+0x362/0x670 fs/namei.c:4182 __do_sys_unlinkat fs/namei.c:4362 [inline] __se_sys_unlinkat fs/namei.c:4356 [inline] __x64_sys_unlinkat+0xdc/0xf0 fs/namei.c:4356 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &tree->tree_lock/2 --> &HFSPLUS_I(inode)->extents_lock --> &tree->tree_lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&tree->tree_lock); lock(&HFSPLUS_I(inode)->extents_lock); lock(&tree->tree_lock); lock(&tree->tree_lock/2); *** DEADLOCK *** 5 locks held by syz-executor.5/24513: #0: ffff888076d54460 (sb_writers#24){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write+0x3b/0x80 fs/namespace.c:393 #1: ffff888077a2c680 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#12/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock_nested include/linux/fs.h:791 [inline] #1: ffff888077a2c680 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#12/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: do_rmdir+0x21f/0x670 fs/namei.c:4169 #2: ffff888077a2dac0 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#32){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:756 [inline] #2: ffff888077a2dac0 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#32){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: vfs_rmdir+0xf9/0x4b0 fs/namei.c:4110 #3: ffff88807bff2198 (&sbi->vh_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hfsplus_rmdir+0xbd/0x1b0 fs/hfsplus/dir.c:424 #4: ffff888076d560b0 (&tree->tree_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hfsplus_find_init+0x146/0x1c0 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 24513 Comm: syz-executor.5 Not tainted 6.1.33-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 05/25/2023 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x1e3/0x2cb lib/dump_stack.c:106 check_noncircular+0x2fa/0x3b0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2178 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3098 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3217 [inline] validate_chain+0x1667/0x58e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3832 __lock_acquire+0x125b/0x1f80 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5056 lock_acquire+0x1f8/0x5a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5669 __mutex_lock_common+0x1d4/0x2520 kernel/locking/mutex.c:603 __mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 [inline] mutex_lock_nested+0x17/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:799 hfsplus_find_init+0x146/0x1c0 hfsplus_delete_all_attrs+0x107/0x3c0 fs/hfsplus/attributes.c:366 hfsplus_delete_cat+0xb83/0xfb0 fs/hfsplus/catalog.c:425 hfsplus_rmdir+0xf1/0x1b0 fs/hfsplus/dir.c:425 vfs_rmdir+0x35b/0x4b0 fs/namei.c:4121 do_rmdir+0x362/0x670 fs/namei.c:4182 __do_sys_unlinkat fs/namei.c:4362 [inline] __se_sys_unlinkat fs/namei.c:4356 [inline] __x64_sys_unlinkat+0xdc/0xf0 fs/namei.c:4356 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd RIP: 0033:0x7f4f4ca8c199 Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 f1 19 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007f4f4d8a9168 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000107 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f4f4cbabf80 RCX: 00007f4f4ca8c199 RDX: 0000000000000200 RSI: 0000000020000940 RDI: 0000000000000004 RBP: 00007f4f4cae7ca1 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 00007ffc1f1cfe7f R14: 00007f4f4d8a9300 R15: 0000000000022000