====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.15.160-syzkaller #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kworker/0:3/3574 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8880793775c0 (&stab->lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: __sock_map_delete net/core/sock_map.c:419 [inline] ffff8880793775c0 (&stab->lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sock_map_delete_elem+0x161/0x230 net/core/sock_map.c:451 but task is already holding lock: ffff888063565290 (&psock->link_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:368 [inline] ffff888063565290 (&psock->link_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: sock_map_del_link net/core/sock_map.c:147 [inline] ffff888063565290 (&psock->link_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: sock_map_unref+0xcc/0x5d0 net/core/sock_map.c:182 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&psock->link_lock){+...}-{2:2}: lock_acquire+0x1db/0x4f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5623 __raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:135 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x31/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:178 spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:368 [inline] sock_map_add_link net/core/sock_map.c:136 [inline] sock_map_update_common+0x31c/0x5b0 net/core/sock_map.c:505 sock_map_update_elem_sys+0x440/0x770 net/core/sock_map.c:588 map_update_elem+0x6a0/0x7c0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:1185 __sys_bpf+0x2fd/0x670 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4639 __do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4755 [inline] __se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4753 [inline] __x64_sys_bpf+0x78/0x90 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4753 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x66/0xd0 -> #0 (&stab->lock){+.-.}-{2:2}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3053 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3172 [inline] validate_chain+0x1649/0x5930 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3788 __lock_acquire+0x1295/0x1ff0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5012 lock_acquire+0x1db/0x4f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5623 __raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:135 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x31/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:178 __sock_map_delete net/core/sock_map.c:419 [inline] sock_map_delete_elem+0x161/0x230 net/core/sock_map.c:451 bpf_prog_d284ea97e99fac5b+0x3f/0x78 bpf_dispatcher_nop_func include/linux/bpf.h:790 [inline] __bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:628 [inline] bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:635 [inline] __bpf_trace_run kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1880 [inline] bpf_trace_run2+0x19e/0x340 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1917 __bpf_trace_kfree+0x6e/0x90 include/trace/events/kmem.h:118 trace_kfree include/trace/events/kmem.h:118 [inline] kfree+0x22f/0x270 mm/slub.c:4549 sk_psock_free_link include/linux/skmsg.h:421 [inline] sock_map_del_link net/core/sock_map.c:160 [inline] sock_map_unref+0x3ac/0x5d0 net/core/sock_map.c:182 sock_map_free+0x1c9/0x3a0 net/core/sock_map.c:353 process_one_work+0x8a1/0x10c0 kernel/workqueue.c:2310 worker_thread+0xaca/0x1280 kernel/workqueue.c:2457 kthread+0x3f6/0x4f0 kernel/kthread.c:334 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:300 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&psock->link_lock); lock(&stab->lock); lock(&psock->link_lock); lock(&stab->lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 6 locks held by kworker/0:3/3574: #0: ffff888011c70938 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x78a/0x10c0 kernel/workqueue.c:2283 #1: ffffc90003117d20 ((work_completion)(&map->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x7d0/0x10c0 kernel/workqueue.c:2285 #2: ffff88807dcf5120 (sk_lock-AF_UNIX){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1668 [inline] #2: ffff88807dcf5120 (sk_lock-AF_UNIX){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: sock_map_free+0x12b/0x3a0 net/core/sock_map.c:351 #3: ffffffff8c91fae0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire+0x5/0x30 include/linux/rcupdate.h:311 #4: ffff888063565290 (&psock->link_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:368 [inline] #4: ffff888063565290 (&psock->link_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: sock_map_del_link net/core/sock_map.c:147 [inline] #4: ffff888063565290 (&psock->link_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: sock_map_unref+0xcc/0x5d0 net/core/sock_map.c:182 #5: ffffffff8c91fae0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire+0x5/0x30 include/linux/rcupdate.h:311 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 3574 Comm: kworker/0:3 Not tainted 5.15.160-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 06/07/2024 Workqueue: events bpf_map_free_deferred Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x1e3/0x2d0 lib/dump_stack.c:106 check_noncircular+0x2f8/0x3b0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2133 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3053 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3172 [inline] validate_chain+0x1649/0x5930 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3788 __lock_acquire+0x1295/0x1ff0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5012 lock_acquire+0x1db/0x4f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5623 __raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:135 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x31/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:178 __sock_map_delete net/core/sock_map.c:419 [inline] sock_map_delete_elem+0x161/0x230 net/core/sock_map.c:451 bpf_prog_d284ea97e99fac5b+0x3f/0x78 bpf_dispatcher_nop_func include/linux/bpf.h:790 [inline] __bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:628 [inline] bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:635 [inline] __bpf_trace_run kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1880 [inline] bpf_trace_run2+0x19e/0x340 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1917 __bpf_trace_kfree+0x6e/0x90 include/trace/events/kmem.h:118 trace_kfree include/trace/events/kmem.h:118 [inline] kfree+0x22f/0x270 mm/slub.c:4549 sk_psock_free_link include/linux/skmsg.h:421 [inline] sock_map_del_link net/core/sock_map.c:160 [inline] sock_map_unref+0x3ac/0x5d0 net/core/sock_map.c:182 sock_map_free+0x1c9/0x3a0 net/core/sock_map.c:353 process_one_work+0x8a1/0x10c0 kernel/workqueue.c:2310 worker_thread+0xaca/0x1280 kernel/workqueue.c:2457 kthread+0x3f6/0x4f0 kernel/kthread.c:334 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:300