loop0: detected capacity change from 0 to 64 ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.1.53-syzkaller #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz-executor579/4295 is trying to acquire lock: ffff0000c33180b0 (&tree->tree_lock/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hfs_find_init+0x148/0x1c8 but task is already holding lock: ffff0000dc151478 (&HFS_I(tree->inode)->extents_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hfs_extend_file+0xe4/0x1130 fs/hfs/extent.c:397 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&HFS_I(tree->inode)->extents_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock_common+0x190/0x21a0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:603 __mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 [inline] mutex_lock_nested+0x38/0x44 kernel/locking/mutex.c:799 hfs_extend_file+0xe4/0x1130 fs/hfs/extent.c:397 hfs_bmap_reserve+0xd0/0x3b4 fs/hfs/btree.c:234 __hfs_ext_write_extent+0x1a0/0x468 fs/hfs/extent.c:121 hfs_ext_write_extent+0x148/0x1c0 fs/hfs/extent.c:144 hfs_write_inode+0xc0/0xc1c fs/hfs/inode.c:431 write_inode fs/fs-writeback.c:1443 [inline] __writeback_single_inode+0x614/0x1770 fs/fs-writeback.c:1655 writeback_sb_inodes+0x978/0x16c0 fs/fs-writeback.c:1881 wb_writeback+0x414/0x1130 fs/fs-writeback.c:2055 wb_do_writeback fs/fs-writeback.c:2198 [inline] wb_workfn+0x3a8/0x1034 fs/fs-writeback.c:2238 process_one_work+0x7ac/0x1404 kernel/workqueue.c:2292 worker_thread+0x8e4/0xfec kernel/workqueue.c:2439 kthread+0x250/0x2d8 kernel/kthread.c:376 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:860 -> #0 (&tree->tree_lock/1){+.+.}-{3:3}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3090 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3209 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3824 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x3338/0x764c kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5048 lock_acquire+0x26c/0x7cc kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5661 __mutex_lock_common+0x190/0x21a0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:603 __mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 [inline] mutex_lock_nested+0x38/0x44 kernel/locking/mutex.c:799 hfs_find_init+0x148/0x1c8 hfs_ext_read_extent fs/hfs/extent.c:200 [inline] hfs_extend_file+0x270/0x1130 fs/hfs/extent.c:401 hfs_bmap_reserve+0xd0/0x3b4 fs/hfs/btree.c:234 hfs_cat_create+0x1bc/0x844 fs/hfs/catalog.c:104 hfs_create+0x70/0xe4 fs/hfs/dir.c:202 lookup_open fs/namei.c:3413 [inline] open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3481 [inline] path_openat+0xeac/0x2548 fs/namei.c:3711 do_filp_open+0x1bc/0x3cc fs/namei.c:3741 do_sys_openat2+0x128/0x3d8 fs/open.c:1318 do_sys_open fs/open.c:1334 [inline] __do_sys_openat fs/open.c:1350 [inline] __se_sys_openat fs/open.c:1345 [inline] __arm64_sys_openat+0x1f0/0x240 fs/open.c:1345 __invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:38 [inline] invoke_syscall+0x98/0x2c0 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:52 el0_svc_common+0x138/0x258 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:142 do_el0_svc+0x64/0x218 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:206 el0_svc+0x58/0x168 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:637 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xf0 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:655 el0t_64_sync+0x18c/0x190 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:581 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&HFS_I(tree->inode)->extents_lock); lock(&tree->tree_lock/1); lock(&HFS_I(tree->inode)->extents_lock); lock(&tree->tree_lock/1); *** DEADLOCK *** 4 locks held by syz-executor579/4295: #0: ffff0000c331a460 (sb_writers#8){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write+0x44/0x9c fs/namespace.c:393 #1: ffff0000dc151ca8 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:756 [inline] #1: ffff0000dc151ca8 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3478 [inline] #1: ffff0000dc151ca8 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: path_openat+0x5ec/0x2548 fs/namei.c:3711 #2: ffff0000cd4680b0 (&tree->tree_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hfs_find_init+0x148/0x1c8 #3: ffff0000dc151478 (&HFS_I(tree->inode)->extents_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hfs_extend_file+0xe4/0x1130 fs/hfs/extent.c:397 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 4295 Comm: syz-executor579 Not tainted 6.1.53-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 07/26/2023 Call trace: dump_backtrace+0x1c8/0x1f4 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:158 show_stack+0x2c/0x3c arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:165 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x108/0x170 lib/dump_stack.c:106 dump_stack+0x1c/0x5c lib/dump_stack.c:113 print_circular_bug+0x150/0x1b8 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2048 check_noncircular+0x2cc/0x378 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2170 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3090 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3209 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3824 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x3338/0x764c kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5048 lock_acquire+0x26c/0x7cc kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5661 __mutex_lock_common+0x190/0x21a0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:603 __mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 [inline] mutex_lock_nested+0x38/0x44 kernel/locking/mutex.c:799 hfs_find_init+0x148/0x1c8 hfs_ext_read_extent fs/hfs/extent.c:200 [inline] hfs_extend_file+0x270/0x1130 fs/hfs/extent.c:401 hfs_bmap_reserve+0xd0/0x3b4 fs/hfs/btree.c:234 hfs_cat_create+0x1bc/0x844 fs/hfs/catalog.c:104 hfs_create+0x70/0xe4 fs/hfs/dir.c:202 lookup_open fs/namei.c:3413 [inline] open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3481 [inline] path_openat+0xeac/0x2548 fs/namei.c:3711 do_filp_open+0x1bc/0x3cc fs/namei.c:3741 do_sys_openat2+0x128/0x3d8 fs/open.c:1318 do_sys_open fs/open.c:1334 [inline] __do_sys_openat fs/open.c:1350 [inline] __se_sys_openat fs/open.c:1345 [inline] __arm64_sys_openat+0x1f0/0x240 fs/open.c:1345 __invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:38 [inline] invoke_syscall+0x98/0x2c0 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:52 el0_svc_common+0x138/0x258 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:142 do_el0_svc+0x64/0x218 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:206 el0_svc+0x58/0x168 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:637 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xf0 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:655 el0t_64_sync+0x18c/0x190 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:581 hfs: request for non-existent node 16777216 in B*Tree hfs: request for non-existent node 16777216 in B*Tree hfs: inconsistency in B*Tree (5,0,1,0,1)