====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.7.0-rc2-syzkaller-00206-gb46ae77f6787 #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz-executor.5/6189 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8880201548f8 (&sbi->alloc_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hfsplus_block_free+0xbb/0x4d0 fs/hfsplus/bitmap.c:182 but task is already holding lock: ffff88807adb22c8 (&HFSPLUS_I(inode)->extents_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hfsplus_file_truncate+0x2da/0xb40 fs/hfsplus/extents.c:576 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&HFSPLUS_I(inode)->extents_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x530 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5753 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:603 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x136/0xd60 kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 hfsplus_get_block+0x383/0x14e0 fs/hfsplus/extents.c:260 block_read_full_folio+0x474/0xea0 fs/buffer.c:2399 filemap_read_folio+0x19c/0x780 mm/filemap.c:2323 do_read_cache_folio+0x134/0x810 mm/filemap.c:3691 do_read_cache_page+0x30/0x200 mm/filemap.c:3757 read_mapping_page include/linux/pagemap.h:871 [inline] hfsplus_block_allocate+0xee/0x8b0 fs/hfsplus/bitmap.c:37 hfsplus_file_extend+0xade/0x1b70 fs/hfsplus/extents.c:468 hfsplus_get_block+0x406/0x14e0 fs/hfsplus/extents.c:245 __block_write_begin_int+0x54d/0x1ad0 fs/buffer.c:2119 __block_write_begin fs/buffer.c:2168 [inline] block_write_begin+0x9b/0x1e0 fs/buffer.c:2227 cont_write_begin+0x643/0x880 fs/buffer.c:2582 hfsplus_write_begin+0x8a/0xd0 fs/hfsplus/inode.c:52 generic_perform_write+0x31b/0x630 mm/filemap.c:3918 generic_file_write_iter+0xaf/0x310 mm/filemap.c:4039 call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2020 [inline] new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:491 [inline] vfs_write+0x792/0xb20 fs/read_write.c:584 ksys_write+0x1a0/0x2c0 fs/read_write.c:637 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x45/0x110 arch/x86/entry/common.c:82 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b -> #0 (&sbi->alloc_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline] validate_chain+0x18e4/0x59f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3868 __lock_acquire+0x1345/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5136 lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x530 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5753 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:603 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x136/0xd60 kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 hfsplus_block_free+0xbb/0x4d0 fs/hfsplus/bitmap.c:182 hfsplus_free_extents+0x17a/0xae0 fs/hfsplus/extents.c:363 hfsplus_file_truncate+0x7d0/0xb40 fs/hfsplus/extents.c:591 hfsplus_delete_inode+0x174/0x220 hfsplus_unlink+0x512/0x790 fs/hfsplus/dir.c:405 vfs_unlink+0x35d/0x5f0 fs/namei.c:4318 do_unlinkat+0x4ae/0x830 fs/namei.c:4382 __do_sys_unlink fs/namei.c:4430 [inline] __se_sys_unlink fs/namei.c:4428 [inline] __x64_sys_unlink+0x49/0x50 fs/namei.c:4428 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x45/0x110 arch/x86/entry/common.c:82 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&HFSPLUS_I(inode)->extents_lock); lock(&sbi->alloc_mutex); lock(&HFSPLUS_I(inode)->extents_lock); lock(&sbi->alloc_mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 5 locks held by syz-executor.5/6189: #0: ffff88803a090418 (sb_writers#27){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write+0x3f/0x90 fs/namespace.c:404 #1: ffff88807adb1e00 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#22/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock_nested include/linux/fs.h:837 [inline] #1: ffff88807adb1e00 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#22/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: do_unlinkat+0x26a/0x830 fs/namei.c:4369 #2: ffff88807adb24c0 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#34){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:802 [inline] #2: ffff88807adb24c0 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#34){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: vfs_unlink+0xe4/0x5f0 fs/namei.c:4307 #3: ffff888020154998 (&sbi->vh_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hfsplus_unlink+0x161/0x790 fs/hfsplus/dir.c:370 #4: ffff88807adb22c8 (&HFSPLUS_I(inode)->extents_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hfsplus_file_truncate+0x2da/0xb40 fs/hfsplus/extents.c:576 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 6189 Comm: syz-executor.5 Not tainted 6.7.0-rc2-syzkaller-00206-gb46ae77f6787 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 11/10/2023 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x1e7/0x2d0 lib/dump_stack.c:106 check_noncircular+0x366/0x490 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2187 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline] validate_chain+0x18e4/0x59f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3868 __lock_acquire+0x1345/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5136 lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x530 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5753 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:603 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x136/0xd60 kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 hfsplus_block_free+0xbb/0x4d0 fs/hfsplus/bitmap.c:182 hfsplus_free_extents+0x17a/0xae0 fs/hfsplus/extents.c:363 hfsplus_file_truncate+0x7d0/0xb40 fs/hfsplus/extents.c:591 hfsplus_delete_inode+0x174/0x220 hfsplus_unlink+0x512/0x790 fs/hfsplus/dir.c:405 vfs_unlink+0x35d/0x5f0 fs/namei.c:4318 do_unlinkat+0x4ae/0x830 fs/namei.c:4382 __do_sys_unlink fs/namei.c:4430 [inline] __se_sys_unlink fs/namei.c:4428 [inline] __x64_sys_unlink+0x49/0x50 fs/namei.c:4428 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x45/0x110 arch/x86/entry/common.c:82 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b RIP: 0033:0x7fa05547cae9 Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 e1 20 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007fa0561a60c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000057 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fa05559bf80 RCX: 00007fa05547cae9 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000020000080 RBP: 00007fa0554c847a R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 000000000000000b R14: 00007fa05559bf80 R15: 00007ffd5267c748 hfsplus: extend alloc file! (8192,327680,2)