====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.8.0-rc2-syzkaller #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz-executor375/5063 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88807c7d13f8 ((work_completion)(&new_smc->smc_listen_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0xfa/0xa10 kernel/workqueue.c:3406 but task is already holding lock: ffff88807c7d0130 (sk_lock-AF_SMC/1){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: smc_release+0x3a3/0x640 net/smc/af_smc.c:336 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (sk_lock-AF_SMC/1){+.+.}-{0:0}: lock_sock_nested+0x3a/0xf0 net/core/sock.c:3524 smc_listen_out+0x1e7/0x4b0 net/smc/af_smc.c:1914 smc_listen_out_connected net/smc/af_smc.c:1934 [inline] smc_listen_work+0x56e/0x5190 net/smc/af_smc.c:2448 process_one_work+0x886/0x15d0 kernel/workqueue.c:2633 process_scheduled_works kernel/workqueue.c:2706 [inline] worker_thread+0x8b9/0x1290 kernel/workqueue.c:2787 kthread+0x2c6/0x3a0 kernel/kthread.c:388 ret_from_fork+0x45/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:242 -> #0 ((work_completion)(&new_smc->smc_listen_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x2445/0x3b30 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137 lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 [inline] lock_acquire+0x1ae/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5719 __flush_work+0x103/0xa10 kernel/workqueue.c:3406 __cancel_work_timer+0x3ef/0x590 kernel/workqueue.c:3497 smc_clcsock_release+0x5f/0xe0 net/smc/smc_close.c:29 __smc_release+0x5b9/0x890 net/smc/af_smc.c:301 smc_close_non_accepted+0xda/0x230 net/smc/af_smc.c:1846 smc_close_cleanup_listen net/smc/smc_close.c:45 [inline] smc_close_active+0xc2d/0x1070 net/smc/smc_close.c:225 __smc_release+0x62b/0x890 net/smc/af_smc.c:277 smc_release+0x209/0x640 net/smc/af_smc.c:344 __sock_release+0xae/0x260 net/socket.c:659 sock_close+0x1c/0x20 net/socket.c:1421 __fput+0x270/0xb70 fs/file_table.c:376 task_work_run+0x14d/0x240 kernel/task_work.c:180 exit_task_work include/linux/task_work.h:38 [inline] do_exit+0xa8a/0x2ad0 kernel/exit.c:871 do_group_exit+0xd4/0x2a0 kernel/exit.c:1020 __do_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1031 [inline] __se_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1029 [inline] __x64_sys_exit_group+0x3e/0x50 kernel/exit.c:1029 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xd3/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(sk_lock-AF_SMC/1); lock((work_completion)(&new_smc->smc_listen_work)); lock(sk_lock-AF_SMC/1); lock((work_completion)(&new_smc->smc_listen_work)); *** DEADLOCK *** 2 locks held by syz-executor375/5063: #0: ffff888077826210 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#10){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:802 [inline] #0: ffff888077826210 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#10){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __sock_release+0x86/0x260 net/socket.c:658 #1: ffff88807c7d0130 (sk_lock-AF_SMC/1){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: smc_release+0x3a3/0x640 net/smc/af_smc.c:336 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 5063 Comm: syz-executor375 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc2-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 11/17/2023 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0xd9/0x1b0 lib/dump_stack.c:106 check_noncircular+0x317/0x400 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2187 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x2445/0x3b30 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137 lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 [inline] lock_acquire+0x1ae/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5719 __flush_work+0x103/0xa10 kernel/workqueue.c:3406 __cancel_work_timer+0x3ef/0x590 kernel/workqueue.c:3497 smc_clcsock_release+0x5f/0xe0 net/smc/smc_close.c:29 __smc_release+0x5b9/0x890 net/smc/af_smc.c:301 smc_close_non_accepted+0xda/0x230 net/smc/af_smc.c:1846 smc_close_cleanup_listen net/smc/smc_close.c:45 [inline] smc_close_active+0xc2d/0x1070 net/smc/smc_close.c:225 __smc_release+0x62b/0x890 net/smc/af_smc.c:277 smc_release+0x209/0x640 net/smc/af_smc.c:344 __sock_release+0xae/0x260 net/socket.c:659 sock_close+0x1c/0x20 net/socket.c:1421 __fput+0x270/0xb70 fs/file_table.c:376 task_work_run+0x14d/0x240 kernel/task_work.c:180 exit_task_work include/linux/task_work.h:38 [inline] do_exit+0xa8a/0x2ad0 kernel/exit.c:871 do_group_exit+0xd4/0x2a0 kernel/exit.c:1020 __do_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1031 [inline] __se_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1029 [inline] __x64_sys_exit_group+0x3e/0x50 kernel/exit.c:1029 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xd3/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b RIP: 0033:0x7ff613923cf9 Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at 0x7ff613923ccf. RSP: 002b:00007ffd1efcec48 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000e7 RAX