REISERFS (device loop4): Using r5 hash to sort names ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.15.158-syzkaller #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz-executor.4/6951 is trying to acquire lock: ffff0000ed2de460 (sb_writers#28){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write_file+0x64/0x1e8 fs/namespace.c:421 but task is already holding lock: ffff0000d0193090 (&sbi->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: reiserfs_write_lock+0x7c/0xe8 fs/reiserfs/lock.c:27 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (&sbi->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock_common+0x194/0x2154 kernel/locking/mutex.c:596 __mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:729 [inline] mutex_lock_nested+0xa4/0xf8 kernel/locking/mutex.c:743 reiserfs_write_lock+0x7c/0xe8 fs/reiserfs/lock.c:27 reiserfs_lookup+0x130/0x3c4 fs/reiserfs/namei.c:364 __lookup_slow+0x250/0x388 fs/namei.c:1663 lookup_one_len+0x178/0x28c fs/namei.c:2718 reiserfs_lookup_privroot+0x8c/0x204 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:980 reiserfs_fill_super+0x1aec/0x1e8c fs/reiserfs/super.c:2178 mount_bdev+0x274/0x370 fs/super.c:1387 get_super_block+0x44/0x58 fs/reiserfs/super.c:2608 legacy_get_tree+0xd4/0x16c fs/fs_context.c:611 vfs_get_tree+0x90/0x274 fs/super.c:1517 do_new_mount+0x278/0x8fc fs/namespace.c:3005 path_mount+0x594/0x101c fs/namespace.c:3335 do_mount fs/namespace.c:3348 [inline] __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3556 [inline] __se_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3533 [inline] __arm64_sys_mount+0x510/0x5e0 fs/namespace.c:3533 __invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:38 [inline] invoke_syscall+0x98/0x2b8 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:52 el0_svc_common+0x138/0x258 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:142 do_el0_svc+0x58/0x14c arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:181 el0_svc+0x7c/0x1f0 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:608 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xe4 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:626 el0t_64_sync+0x1a0/0x1a4 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:584 -> #1 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#22){+.+.}-{3:3}: down_write+0xbc/0x12c kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1551 inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:789 [inline] open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3529 [inline] path_openat+0x640/0x26cc fs/namei.c:3739 do_filp_open+0x1a8/0x3b4 fs/namei.c:3769 do_sys_openat2+0x128/0x3d8 fs/open.c:1253 do_sys_open fs/open.c:1269 [inline] __do_sys_openat fs/open.c:1285 [inline] __se_sys_openat fs/open.c:1280 [inline] __arm64_sys_openat+0x1f0/0x240 fs/open.c:1280 __invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:38 [inline] invoke_syscall+0x98/0x2b8 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:52 el0_svc_common+0x138/0x258 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:142 do_el0_svc+0x58/0x14c arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:181 el0_svc+0x7c/0x1f0 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:608 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xe4 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:626 el0t_64_sync+0x1a0/0x1a4 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:584 -> #0 (sb_writers#28){.+.+}-{0:0}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3053 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3172 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3788 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x32d4/0x7638 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5012 lock_acquire+0x240/0x77c kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5623 percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline] __sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1811 [inline] sb_start_write+0xf0/0x3ac include/linux/fs.h:1881 mnt_want_write_file+0x64/0x1e8 fs/namespace.c:421 reiserfs_ioctl+0x188/0x4b8 fs/reiserfs/ioctl.c:103 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:874 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:860 [inline] __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x14c/0x1c8 fs/ioctl.c:860 __invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:38 [inline] invoke_syscall+0x98/0x2b8 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:52 el0_svc_common+0x138/0x258 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:142 do_el0_svc+0x58/0x14c arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:181 el0_svc+0x7c/0x1f0 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:608 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xe4 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:626 el0t_64_sync+0x1a0/0x1a4 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:584 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: sb_writers#28 --> &type->i_mutex_dir_key#22 --> &sbi->lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&sbi->lock); lock(&type->i_mutex_dir_key#22); lock(&sbi->lock); lock(sb_writers#28); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by syz-executor.4/6951: #0: ffff0000d0193090 (&sbi->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: reiserfs_write_lock+0x7c/0xe8 fs/reiserfs/lock.c:27 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 6951 Comm: syz-executor.4 Not tainted 5.15.158-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024 Call trace: dump_backtrace+0x0/0x530 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:152 show_stack+0x2c/0x3c arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:216 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x108/0x170 lib/dump_stack.c:106 dump_stack+0x1c/0x58 lib/dump_stack.c:113 print_circular_bug+0x150/0x1b8 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2011 check_noncircular+0x2cc/0x378 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2133 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3053 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3172 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3788 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x32d4/0x7638 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5012 lock_acquire+0x240/0x77c kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5623 percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline] __sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1811 [inline] sb_start_write+0xf0/0x3ac include/linux/fs.h:1881 mnt_want_write_file+0x64/0x1e8 fs/namespace.c:421 reiserfs_ioctl+0x188/0x4b8 fs/reiserfs/ioctl.c:103 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:874 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:860 [inline] __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x14c/0x1c8 fs/ioctl.c:860 __invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:38 [inline] invoke_syscall+0x98/0x2b8 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:52 el0_svc_common+0x138/0x258 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:142 do_el0_svc+0x58/0x14c arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:181 el0_svc+0x7c/0x1f0 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:608 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xe4 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:626 el0t_64_sync+0x1a0/0x1a4 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:584