====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 4.14.140+ #39 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz-executor.2/1870 is trying to acquire lock: (&cpuctx_mutex/1){+.+.}, at: [<00000000171d310b>] mutex_lock_double kernel/events/core.c:9909 [inline] (&cpuctx_mutex/1){+.+.}, at: [<00000000171d310b>] __perf_event_ctx_lock_double kernel/events/core.c:9968 [inline] (&cpuctx_mutex/1){+.+.}, at: [<00000000171d310b>] SYSC_perf_event_open kernel/events/core.c:10233 [inline] (&cpuctx_mutex/1){+.+.}, at: [<00000000171d310b>] SyS_perf_event_open+0x12cf/0x2560 kernel/events/core.c:9988 but task is already holding lock: (&cpuctx_mutex){+.+.}, at: [<0000000067a1734e>] mutex_lock_double kernel/events/core.c:9908 [inline] (&cpuctx_mutex){+.+.}, at: [<0000000067a1734e>] __perf_event_ctx_lock_double kernel/events/core.c:9968 [inline] (&cpuctx_mutex){+.+.}, at: [<0000000067a1734e>] SYSC_perf_event_open kernel/events/core.c:10233 [inline] (&cpuctx_mutex){+.+.}, at: [<0000000067a1734e>] SyS_perf_event_open+0x12c2/0x2560 kernel/events/core.c:9988 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (&cpuctx_mutex){+.+.}: __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:756 [inline] __mutex_lock+0xf7/0x13e0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:893 perf_event_init_cpu+0xa8/0x150 kernel/events/core.c:11231 perf_event_init+0x289/0x2c5 kernel/events/core.c:11278 start_kernel+0x43d/0x74a init/main.c:621 secondary_startup_64+0xa5/0xb0 arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S:240 -> #1 (pmus_lock){+.+.}: __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:756 [inline] __mutex_lock+0xf7/0x13e0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:893 swevent_hlist_get kernel/events/core.c:7896 [inline] perf_swevent_init+0x123/0x4f0 kernel/events/core.c:7956 perf_try_init_event+0xe5/0x200 kernel/events/core.c:9347 perf_init_event kernel/events/core.c:9385 [inline] perf_event_alloc.part.0+0xd13/0x1ff0 kernel/events/core.c:9645 perf_event_alloc kernel/events/core.c:9998 [inline] SYSC_perf_event_open kernel/events/core.c:10105 [inline] SyS_perf_event_open+0x6eb/0x2560 kernel/events/core.c:9988 do_syscall_64+0x19b/0x520 arch/x86/entry/common.c:292 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x42/0xb7 -> #0 (&cpuctx_mutex/1){+.+.}: lock_acquire+0x12b/0x360 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3991 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:756 [inline] __mutex_lock+0xf7/0x13e0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:893 mutex_lock_double kernel/events/core.c:9909 [inline] __perf_event_ctx_lock_double kernel/events/core.c:9968 [inline] SYSC_perf_event_open kernel/events/core.c:10233 [inline] SyS_perf_event_open+0x12cf/0x2560 kernel/events/core.c:9988 do_syscall_64+0x19b/0x520 arch/x86/entry/common.c:292 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x42/0xb7 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &cpuctx_mutex/1 --> pmus_lock --> &cpuctx_mutex Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&cpuctx_mutex); lock(pmus_lock); lock(&cpuctx_mutex); lock(&cpuctx_mutex/1); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by syz-executor.2/1870: #0: (&cpuctx_mutex){+.+.}, at: [<0000000067a1734e>] mutex_lock_double kernel/events/core.c:9908 [inline] #0: (&cpuctx_mutex){+.+.}, at: [<0000000067a1734e>] __perf_event_ctx_lock_double kernel/events/core.c:9968 [inline] #0: (&cpuctx_mutex){+.+.}, at: [<0000000067a1734e>] SYSC_perf_event_open kernel/events/core.c:10233 [inline] #0: (&cpuctx_mutex){+.+.}, at: [<0000000067a1734e>] SyS_perf_event_open+0x12c2/0x2560 kernel/events/core.c:9988 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 1870 Comm: syz-executor.2 Not tainted 4.14.140+ #39 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:17 [inline] dump_stack+0xca/0x134 lib/dump_stack.c:53 print_circular_bug.isra.0.cold+0x2dc/0x425 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1258 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1901 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2018 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2460 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x2f5f/0x4320 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3487 lock_acquire+0x12b/0x360 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3991 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:756 [inline] __mutex_lock+0xf7/0x13e0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:893 mutex_lock_double kernel/events/core.c:9909 [inline] __perf_event_ctx_lock_double kernel/events/core.c:9968 [inline] SYSC_perf_event_open kernel/events/core.c:10233 [inline] SyS_perf_event_open+0x12cf/0x2560 kernel/events/core.c:9988 do_syscall_64+0x19b/0x520 arch/x86/entry/common.c:292 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x42/0xb7 RIP: 0033:0x459879 RSP: 002b:00007fc55fe68c78 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000012a RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000005 RCX: 0000000000459879 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffffffffffff RDI: 0000000020000200 RBP: 000000000075bf20 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000003 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007fc55fe696d4 R13: 00000000004c66e4 R14: 00000000004db758 R15: 00000000ffffffff ip6_tunnel: ip6tnl1 xmit: Local address not yet configured!