REISERFS warning (device loop0): jdm-13090 reiserfs_new_inode: ACLs aren't enabled in the fs, but vfs thinks they are! REISERFS (device loop0): Created .reiserfs_priv - reserved for xattr storage. ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.7.0-rc8-syzkaller-g0802e17d9aca #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz-executor.0/14634 is trying to acquire lock: ffff0000c216c418 (sb_writers#19){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write_file+0x64/0x1e8 fs/namespace.c:448 but task is already holding lock: ffff0000d48b6090 (&sbi->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: reiserfs_write_lock+0x7c/0xe8 fs/reiserfs/lock.c:27 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (&sbi->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock_common+0x190/0x21a0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:603 __mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 [inline] mutex_lock_nested+0x2c/0x38 kernel/locking/mutex.c:799 reiserfs_write_lock+0x7c/0xe8 fs/reiserfs/lock.c:27 reiserfs_lookup+0x128/0x45c fs/reiserfs/namei.c:364 lookup_one_qstr_excl+0x108/0x230 fs/namei.c:1609 filename_create+0x230/0x468 fs/namei.c:3876 do_mkdirat+0xac/0x574 fs/namei.c:4121 __do_sys_mkdirat fs/namei.c:4144 [inline] __se_sys_mkdirat fs/namei.c:4142 [inline] __arm64_sys_mkdirat+0x90/0xa8 fs/namei.c:4142 __invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:37 [inline] invoke_syscall+0x98/0x2b8 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:51 el0_svc_common+0x130/0x23c arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:136 do_el0_svc+0x48/0x58 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:155 el0_svc+0x54/0x158 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:678 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xfc arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:696 el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:595 -> #1 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#13/1){+.+.}-{3:3}: down_write_nested+0x58/0xcc kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1695 inode_lock_nested include/linux/fs.h:837 [inline] filename_create+0x204/0x468 fs/namei.c:3875 do_mkdirat+0xac/0x574 fs/namei.c:4121 __do_sys_mkdirat fs/namei.c:4144 [inline] __se_sys_mkdirat fs/namei.c:4142 [inline] __arm64_sys_mkdirat+0x90/0xa8 fs/namei.c:4142 __invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:37 [inline] invoke_syscall+0x98/0x2b8 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:51 el0_svc_common+0x130/0x23c arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:136 do_el0_svc+0x48/0x58 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:155 el0_svc+0x54/0x158 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:678 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xfc arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:696 el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:595 -> #0 (sb_writers#19){.+.+}-{0:0}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x3384/0x763c kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137 lock_acquire+0x23c/0x71c kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline] __sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1635 [inline] sb_start_write+0x60/0x2ec include/linux/fs.h:1710 mnt_want_write_file+0x64/0x1e8 fs/namespace.c:448 reiserfs_ioctl+0x188/0x42c fs/reiserfs/ioctl.c:103 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:871 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:857 [inline] __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x14c/0x1c8 fs/ioctl.c:857 __invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:37 [inline] invoke_syscall+0x98/0x2b8 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:51 el0_svc_common+0x130/0x23c arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:136 do_el0_svc+0x48/0x58 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:155 el0_svc+0x54/0x158 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:678 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xfc arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:696 el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:595 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: sb_writers#19 --> &type->i_mutex_dir_key#13/1 --> &sbi->lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&sbi->lock); lock(&type->i_mutex_dir_key#13/1); lock(&sbi->lock); rlock(sb_writers#19); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by syz-executor.0/14634: #0: ffff0000d48b6090 (&sbi->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: reiserfs_write_lock+0x7c/0xe8 fs/reiserfs/lock.c:27 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 14634 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 6.7.0-rc8-syzkaller-g0802e17d9aca #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 11/17/2023 Call trace: dump_backtrace+0x1b8/0x1e4 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:291 show_stack+0x2c/0x3c arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:298 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0xd0/0x124 lib/dump_stack.c:106 dump_stack+0x1c/0x28 lib/dump_stack.c:113 print_circular_bug+0x150/0x1b8 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2060 check_noncircular+0x310/0x404 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2187 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x3384/0x763c kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137 lock_acquire+0x23c/0x71c kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline] __sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1635 [inline] sb_start_write+0x60/0x2ec include/linux/fs.h:1710 mnt_want_write_file+0x64/0x1e8 fs/namespace.c:448 reiserfs_ioctl+0x188/0x42c fs/reiserfs/ioctl.c:103 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:871 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:857 [inline] __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x14c/0x1c8 fs/ioctl.c:857 __invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:37 [inline] invoke_syscall+0x98/0x2b8 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:51 el0_svc_common+0x130/0x23c arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:136 do_el0_svc+0x48/0x58 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:155 el0_svc+0x54/0x158 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:678 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xfc arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:696 el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:595