===================================== WARNING: bad unlock balance detected! 6.15.0-rc1-syzkaller-00095-g2eb959eeecc6 #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------- syz.0.0/5325 is trying to release lock (&dev_instance_lock_key) at: [] netdev_unlock include/linux/netdevice.h:2756 [inline] [] netdev_unlock_ops include/net/netdev_lock.h:48 [inline] [] do_setlink+0xc26/0x43a0 net/core/rtnetlink.c:3406 but there are no more locks to release! other info that might help us debug this: 1 lock held by syz.0.0/5325: #0: ffffffff900fd3c8 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: rtnl_lock net/core/rtnetlink.c:80 [inline] #0: ffffffff900fd3c8 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: rtnl_nets_lock net/core/rtnetlink.c:341 [inline] #0: ffffffff900fd3c8 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: rtnl_setlink+0x6d4/0xc00 net/core/rtnetlink.c:3456 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5325 Comm: syz.0.0 Not tainted 6.15.0-rc1-syzkaller-00095-g2eb959eeecc6 #0 PREEMPT(full) Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_unlock_imbalance_bug+0x185/0x1a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5296 __lock_release kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5535 [inline] lock_release+0x1ed/0x3e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5887 __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0xee/0x800 kernel/locking/mutex.c:907 netdev_unlock include/linux/netdevice.h:2756 [inline] netdev_unlock_ops include/net/netdev_lock.h:48 [inline] do_setlink+0xc26/0x43a0 net/core/rtnetlink.c:3406 rtnl_setlink+0x855/0xc00 net/core/rtnetlink.c:3466 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x80f/0xd70 net/core/rtnetlink.c:6955 netlink_rcv_skb+0x208/0x480 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2534 netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1313 [inline] netlink_unicast+0x7f8/0x9a0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1339 netlink_sendmsg+0x8c3/0xcd0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1883 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:712 [inline] __sock_sendmsg+0x221/0x270 net/socket.c:727 ____sys_sendmsg+0x523/0x860 net/socket.c:2566 ___sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2620 [inline] __sys_sendmsg+0x271/0x360 net/socket.c:2652 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7f647298d169 Code: ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 a8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007f646edf5038 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002e RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f6472ba5fa0 RCX: 00007f647298d169 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00002000000000c0 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00007f6472a0e730 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007f6472ba5fa0 R15: 00007ffe255b9418 dccp_check_seqno: Step 6 failed for RESET packet, (LSWL(68708071085209) <= P.seqno(0) <= S.SWH(68708071085283)) and (P.ackno exists or LAWL(270814536387676) <= P.ackno(270814536387677) <= S.AWH(270814536387677), sending SYNC...