overlayfs: fs on 'file0' does not support file handles, falling back to index=off. overlayfs: fs on './file0' does not support file handles, falling back to index=off. usb usb4: Requested nonsensical USBDEVFS_URB_SHORT_NOT_OK. ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 4.14.299-syzkaller #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz-executor.5/9844 is trying to acquire lock: (&ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth]){++++}, at: [] inode_lock_shared include/linux/fs.h:729 [inline] (&ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth]){++++}, at: [] lookup_slow+0x129/0x400 fs/namei.c:1674 but task is already holding lock: (&oi->lock){+.+.}, at: [] ovl_nlink_start+0x22f/0x460 fs/overlayfs/util.c:523 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (&oi->lock){+.+.}: __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:756 [inline] __mutex_lock+0xc4/0x1310 kernel/locking/mutex.c:893 ovl_copy_up_start+0x40/0xe0 fs/overlayfs/util.c:318 ovl_copy_up_one+0x21f/0x910 fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c:631 ovl_copy_up_flags+0xd5/0x120 fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c:686 ovl_rename+0x1a6/0xe50 fs/overlayfs/dir.c:943 vfs_rename+0x560/0x1820 fs/namei.c:4498 SYSC_renameat2 fs/namei.c:4646 [inline] SyS_renameat2+0x95b/0xad0 fs/namei.c:4535 do_syscall_64+0x1d5/0x640 arch/x86/entry/common.c:292 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x5e/0xd3 -> #1 (sb_writers#3){.+.+}: percpu_down_read_preempt_disable include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:36 [inline] percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:59 [inline] __sb_start_write+0x64/0x260 fs/super.c:1342 sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1551 [inline] mnt_want_write+0x3a/0xb0 fs/namespace.c:386 ovl_create_object+0x75/0x1d0 fs/overlayfs/dir.c:538 lookup_open+0x77a/0x1750 fs/namei.c:3241 do_last fs/namei.c:3334 [inline] path_openat+0xe08/0x2970 fs/namei.c:3571 do_filp_open+0x179/0x3c0 fs/namei.c:3605 do_sys_open+0x296/0x410 fs/open.c:1081 do_syscall_64+0x1d5/0x640 arch/x86/entry/common.c:292 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x5e/0xd3 -> #0 (&ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth]){++++}: lock_acquire+0x170/0x3f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3998 down_read+0x36/0x80 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:24 inode_lock_shared include/linux/fs.h:729 [inline] lookup_slow+0x129/0x400 fs/namei.c:1674 lookup_one_len_unlocked+0x3a0/0x410 fs/namei.c:2595 ovl_lower_positive+0x184/0x350 fs/overlayfs/namei.c:783 ovl_rename+0x47c/0xe50 fs/overlayfs/dir.c:968 vfs_rename+0x560/0x1820 fs/namei.c:4498 SYSC_renameat2 fs/namei.c:4646 [inline] SyS_renameat2+0x95b/0xad0 fs/namei.c:4535 do_syscall_64+0x1d5/0x640 arch/x86/entry/common.c:292 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x5e/0xd3 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth] --> sb_writers#3 --> &oi->lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&oi->lock); lock(sb_writers#3); lock(&oi->lock); lock(&ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth]); *** DEADLOCK *** 8 locks held by syz-executor.5/9844: #0: (sb_writers#15){.+.+}, at: [] sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1551 [inline] #0: (sb_writers#15){.+.+}, at: [] mnt_want_write+0x3a/0xb0 fs/namespace.c:386 #1: (&type->s_vfs_rename_key#2){+.+.}, at: [] lock_rename+0x54/0x280 fs/namei.c:2889 #2: (&ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth]#2/1){+.+.}, at: [] inode_lock_nested include/linux/fs.h:754 [inline] #2: (&ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth]#2/1){+.+.}, at: [] lock_rename+0xa0/0x280 fs/namei.c:2893 #3: (&ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth]#2/2){+.+.}, at: [] inode_lock_nested include/linux/fs.h:754 [inline] #3: (&ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth]#2/2){+.+.}, at: [] lock_rename+0xd4/0x280 fs/namei.c:2894 #4: (&ovl_i_mutex_key[depth]#2){+.+.}, at: [] inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:719 [inline] #4: (&ovl_i_mutex_key[depth]#2){+.+.}, at: [] lock_two_nondirectories+0xca/0xf0 fs/inode.c:989 #5: (&ovl_i_mutex_key[depth]#2/4){+.+.}, at: [] inode_lock_nested include/linux/fs.h:754 [inline] #5: (&ovl_i_mutex_key[depth]#2/4){+.+.}, at: [] lock_two_nondirectories+0xb2/0xf0 fs/inode.c:991 #6: (sb_writers#3){.+.+}, at: [] sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1551 [inline] #6: (sb_writers#3){.+.+}, at: [] mnt_want_write+0x3a/0xb0 fs/namespace.c:386 #7: (&oi->lock){+.+.}, at: [] ovl_nlink_start+0x22f/0x460 fs/overlayfs/util.c:523 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 9844 Comm: syz-executor.5 Not tainted 4.14.299-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/26/2022 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:17 [inline] dump_stack+0x1b2/0x281 lib/dump_stack.c:58 print_circular_bug.constprop.0.cold+0x2d7/0x41e kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1258 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1905 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2022 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2464 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x2e0e/0x3f20 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3491 lock_acquire+0x170/0x3f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3998 down_read+0x36/0x80 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:24 inode_lock_shared include/linux/fs.h:729 [inline] lookup_slow+0x129/0x400 fs/namei.c:1674 lookup_one_len_unlocked+0x3a0/0x410 fs/namei.c:2595 ovl_lower_positive+0x184/0x350 fs/overlayfs/namei.c:783 ovl_rename+0x47c/0xe50 fs/overlayfs/dir.c:968 vfs_rename+0x560/0x1820 fs/namei.c:4498 SYSC_renameat2 fs/namei.c:4646 [inline] SyS_renameat2+0x95b/0xad0 fs/namei.c:4535 do_syscall_64+0x1d5/0x640 arch/x86/entry/common.c:292 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x5e/0xd3 usb usb4: Requested nonsensical USBDEVFS_URB_SHORT_NOT_OK. usb usb4: Requested nonsensical USBDEVFS_URB_SHORT_NOT_OK. usb usb4: Requested nonsensical USBDEVFS_URB_SHORT_NOT_OK. overlayfs: fs on 'file0' does not support file handles, falling back to index=off. overlayfs: fs on './file0' does not support file handles, falling back to index=off. SQUASHFS error: zlib decompression failed, data probably corrupt SQUASHFS error: squashfs_read_data failed to read block 0x99 SQUASHFS error: Unable to read metadata cache entry [99] overlayfs: fs on 'file0' does not support file handles, falling back to index=off. SQUASHFS error: Unable to read inode 0x127 overlayfs: fs on './file0' does not support file handles, falling back to index=off. SQUASHFS error: zlib decompression failed, data probably corrupt SQUASHFS error: squashfs_read_data failed to read block 0x99 SQUASHFS error: Unable to read metadata cache entry [99] SQUASHFS error: Unable to read inode 0x127 netlink: 12 bytes leftover after parsing attributes in process `syz-executor.5'. L1TF CPU bug present and SMT on, data leak possible. See CVE-2018-3646 and https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/admin-guide/hw-vuln/l1tf.html for details. netlink: 12 bytes leftover after parsing attributes in process `syz-executor.5'. SQUASHFS error: zlib decompression failed, data probably corrupt SQUASHFS error: squashfs_read_data failed to read block 0x99 netlink: 12 bytes leftover after parsing attributes in process `syz-executor.5'. SQUASHFS error: Unable to read metadata cache entry [99] SQUASHFS error: Unable to read inode 0x127 netlink: 12 bytes leftover after parsing attributes in process `syz-executor.5'. SQUASHFS error: zlib decompression failed, data probably corrupt SQUASHFS error: squashfs_read_data failed to read block 0x99 SQUASHFS error: Unable to read metadata cache entry [99] SQUASHFS error: Unable to read inode 0x127