====================================================== [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] 4.9.141+ #1 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------- syz-executor.4/11179 is trying to acquire lock: (&sig->cred_guard_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [] lock_trace+0x44/0xc0 fs/proc/base.c:431 but task is already holding lock: (&p->lock){+.+.+.}, at: [] seq_read+0xdd/0x12d0 fs/seq_file.c:178 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: lock_acquire+0x130/0x3e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3756 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:521 [inline] mutex_lock_nested+0xc0/0x900 kernel/locking/mutex.c:621 seq_read+0xdd/0x12d0 fs/seq_file.c:178 proc_reg_read+0xfd/0x180 fs/proc/inode.c:203 do_loop_readv_writev.part.1+0xd5/0x280 fs/read_write.c:718 do_loop_readv_writev fs/read_write.c:707 [inline] do_readv_writev+0x56e/0x7b0 fs/read_write.c:873 vfs_readv+0x84/0xc0 fs/read_write.c:897 kernel_readv fs/splice.c:363 [inline] default_file_splice_read+0x451/0x7f0 fs/splice.c:435 do_splice_to+0x10c/0x170 fs/splice.c:899 do_splice fs/splice.c:1192 [inline] SYSC_splice fs/splice.c:1416 [inline] SyS_splice+0x10d2/0x14d0 fs/splice.c:1399 do_syscall_64+0x19f/0x550 arch/x86/entry/common.c:285 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_swapgs+0x5d/0xdb lock_acquire+0x130/0x3e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3756 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:521 [inline] mutex_lock_nested+0xc0/0x900 kernel/locking/mutex.c:621 __pipe_lock fs/pipe.c:87 [inline] fifo_open+0x15c/0x9e0 fs/pipe.c:921 do_dentry_open+0x3ef/0xc90 fs/open.c:766 vfs_open+0x11c/0x210 fs/open.c:879 do_last fs/namei.c:3410 [inline] path_openat+0x542/0x2790 fs/namei.c:3534 do_filp_open+0x197/0x270 fs/namei.c:3568 do_open_execat+0x10f/0x640 fs/exec.c:844 do_execveat_common.isra.14+0x687/0x1ed0 fs/exec.c:1723 do_execve fs/exec.c:1829 [inline] SYSC_execve fs/exec.c:1910 [inline] SyS_execve+0x42/0x50 fs/exec.c:1905 do_syscall_64+0x19f/0x550 arch/x86/entry/common.c:285 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_swapgs+0x5d/0xdb check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1828 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1938 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2265 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x3189/0x4a10 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3345 lock_acquire+0x130/0x3e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3756 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:521 [inline] mutex_lock_killable_nested+0xcc/0x9f0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:641 lock_trace+0x44/0xc0 fs/proc/base.c:431 proc_pid_syscall+0xa9/0x260 fs/proc/base.c:663 proc_single_show+0xfd/0x170 fs/proc/base.c:785 seq_read+0x4b6/0x12d0 fs/seq_file.c:240 do_loop_readv_writev.part.1+0xd5/0x280 fs/read_write.c:718 do_loop_readv_writev fs/read_write.c:707 [inline] do_readv_writev+0x56e/0x7b0 fs/read_write.c:873 vfs_readv+0x84/0xc0 fs/read_write.c:897 do_preadv+0x197/0x240 fs/read_write.c:974 SYSC_preadv fs/read_write.c:1024 [inline] SyS_preadv+0x30/0x40 fs/read_write.c:1019 do_syscall_64+0x19f/0x550 arch/x86/entry/common.c:285 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_swapgs+0x5d/0xdb other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&p->lock); lock(&pipe->mutex/1); lock(&p->lock); lock(&sig->cred_guard_mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by syz-executor.4/11179: #0: (&p->lock){+.+.+.}, at: [] seq_read+0xdd/0x12d0 fs/seq_file.c:178 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 11179 Comm: syz-executor.4 Not tainted 4.9.141+ #1 ffff88019f95f468 ffffffff81b42e79 ffffffff83caa290 ffffffff83ca4fe0 ffffffff83ca2fd0 ffff8801a0da5010 ffff8801a0da4740 ffff88019f95f4b0 ffffffff813fee40 0000000000000001 00000000a0da4ff0 0000000000000001 Call Trace: [] __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:15 [inline] [] dump_stack+0xc1/0x128 lib/dump_stack.c:51 [] print_circular_bug.cold.36+0x2f7/0x432 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1202 [] check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1828 [inline] [] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1938 [inline] [] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2265 [inline] [] __lock_acquire+0x3189/0x4a10 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3345 [] lock_acquire+0x130/0x3e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3756 [] __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:521 [inline] [] mutex_lock_killable_nested+0xcc/0x9f0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:641 [] lock_trace+0x44/0xc0 fs/proc/base.c:431 [] proc_pid_syscall+0xa9/0x260 fs/proc/base.c:663 [] proc_single_show+0xfd/0x170 fs/proc/base.c:785 [] seq_read+0x4b6/0x12d0 fs/seq_file.c:240 [] do_loop_readv_writev.part.1+0xd5/0x280 fs/read_write.c:718 [] do_loop_readv_writev fs/read_write.c:707 [inline] [] do_readv_writev+0x56e/0x7b0 fs/read_write.c:873 [] vfs_readv+0x84/0xc0 fs/read_write.c:897 [] do_preadv+0x197/0x240 fs/read_write.c:974 [] SYSC_preadv fs/read_write.c:1024 [inline] [] SyS_preadv+0x30/0x40 fs/read_write.c:1019 [] do_syscall_64+0x19f/0x550 arch/x86/entry/common.c:285 [] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_swapgs+0x5d/0xdb SELinux: policydb magic number 0x2c27098c does not match expected magic number 0xf97cff8c netlink: 8 bytes leftover after parsing attributes in process `syz-executor.2'. netlink: 8 bytes leftover after parsing attributes in process `syz-executor.2'. input: syz1 as /devices/virtual/input/input32 input: syz1 as /devices/virtual/input/input33 SELinux: policydb magic number 0x2c27098c does not match expected magic number 0xf97cff8c netlink: 24 bytes leftover after parsing attributes in process `syz-executor.4'. IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): lo: link becomes ready qtaguid: iface_stat: create6(lo): no inet dev IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): lo: link becomes ready qtaguid: iface_stat: create6(lo): no inet dev IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): lo: link becomes ready IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): lo: link becomes ready qtaguid: iface_stat: create6(lo): no inet dev IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): lo: link becomes ready selinux_nlmsg_perm: 74 callbacks suppressed SELinux: unrecognized netlink message: protocol=0 nlmsg_type=7 sclass=netlink_route_socket pig=11287 comm=syz-executor.4 netlink: 24 bytes leftover after parsing attributes in process `syz-executor.4'. SELinux: unrecognized netlink message: protocol=0 nlmsg_type=0 sclass=netlink_route_socket pig=11287 comm=syz-executor.4 SELinux: unrecognized netlink message: protocol=0 nlmsg_type=7 sclass=netlink_route_socket pig=11312 comm=syz-executor.4 SELinux: unrecognized netlink message: protocol=0 nlmsg_type=0 sclass=netlink_route_socket pig=11311 comm=syz-executor.4 SELinux: unrecognized netlink message: protocol=0 nlmsg_type=0 sclass=netlink_route_socket pig=11287 comm=syz-executor.4 SELinux: unrecognized netlink message: protocol=0 nlmsg_type=0 sclass=netlink_route_socket pig=11287 comm=syz-executor.4 SELinux: unrecognized netlink message: protocol=0 nlmsg_type=0 sclass=netlink_route_socket pig=11348 comm=syz-executor.5 netlink: 4 bytes leftover after parsing attributes in process `syz-executor.2'. netlink: 4 bytes leftover after parsing attributes in process `syz-executor.2'. audit: type=1400 audit(1574534634.231:59): avc: denied { create } for pid=11406 comm="syz-executor.4" scontext=unconfined_u:system_r:insmod_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 tcontext=system_u:object_r:semanage_trans_lock_t:s0 tclass=rawip_socket permissive=1 audit: type=1400 audit(1574534635.021:60): avc: denied { create } for pid=11406 comm="syz-executor.4" scontext=unconfined_u:system_r:insmod_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 tcontext=system_u:object_r:semanage_trans_lock_t:s0 tclass=tcp_socket permissive=1 SELinux: unrecognized netlink message: protocol=0 nlmsg_type=0 sclass=netlink_route_socket pig=11444 comm=syz-executor.4 SELinux: unrecognized netlink message: protocol=0 nlmsg_type=0 sclass=netlink_route_socket pig=11444 comm=syz-executor.4 SELinux: unrecognized netlink message: protocol=0 nlmsg_type=0 sclass=netlink_route_socket pig=11444 comm=syz-executor.4 Dead loop on virtual device ip6_vti0, fix it urgently!