====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.1.116-syzkaller #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz.1.143/4917 is trying to acquire lock: ffff0000d89b5b48 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: __might_fault+0x9c/0x124 mm/memory.c:5850 but task is already holding lock: ffff0000e161f700 (&ni->ni_lock/5){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ni_lock fs/ntfs3/ntfs_fs.h:1101 [inline] ffff0000e161f700 (&ni->ni_lock/5){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ntfs_fiemap+0xec/0x168 fs/ntfs3/file.c:1244 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (&ni->ni_lock/5){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock_common+0x190/0x21a0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:603 __mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 [inline] mutex_lock_nested+0x38/0x44 kernel/locking/mutex.c:799 ni_lock fs/ntfs3/ntfs_fs.h:1101 [inline] ntfs_set_size+0x124/0x200 fs/ntfs3/inode.c:845 ntfs_fallocate+0x690/0xd88 fs/ntfs3/file.c:690 vfs_fallocate+0x478/0x5b4 fs/open.c:323 ksys_fallocate fs/open.c:346 [inline] __do_sys_fallocate fs/open.c:354 [inline] __se_sys_fallocate fs/open.c:352 [inline] __arm64_sys_fallocate+0xc0/0x110 fs/open.c:352 __invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:38 [inline] invoke_syscall+0x98/0x2c0 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:52 el0_svc_common+0x138/0x258 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:140 do_el0_svc+0x64/0x218 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:204 el0_svc+0x58/0x168 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:637 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xf0 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:655 el0t_64_sync+0x18c/0x190 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:585 -> #1 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#26){+.+.}-{3:3}: down_write+0x5c/0x88 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1573 inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:758 [inline] ntfs_file_mmap+0x4b0/0x688 fs/ntfs3/file.c:399 call_mmap include/linux/fs.h:2270 [inline] mmap_region+0xdd0/0x1a98 mm/mmap.c:2763 do_mmap+0xa00/0x1108 mm/mmap.c:1425 vm_mmap_pgoff+0x1a4/0x2b4 mm/util.c:520 ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x3c8/0x5b0 mm/mmap.c:1471 __do_sys_mmap arch/arm64/kernel/sys.c:28 [inline] __se_sys_mmap arch/arm64/kernel/sys.c:21 [inline] __arm64_sys_mmap+0xf8/0x110 arch/arm64/kernel/sys.c:21 __invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:38 [inline] invoke_syscall+0x98/0x2c0 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:52 el0_svc_common+0x138/0x258 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:140 do_el0_svc+0x64/0x218 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:204 el0_svc+0x58/0x168 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:637 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xf0 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:655 el0t_64_sync+0x18c/0x190 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:585 -> #0 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3090 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3209 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3825 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x3338/0x7680 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5049 lock_acquire+0x26c/0x7cc kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5662 __might_fault+0xc4/0x124 mm/memory.c:5851 _copy_to_user include/linux/uaccess.h:143 [inline] copy_to_user include/linux/uaccess.h:169 [inline] ni_fiemap+0x1134/0x1444 fs/ntfs3/frecord.c:2140 ntfs_fiemap+0x110/0x168 fs/ntfs3/file.c:1246 ioctl_fiemap fs/ioctl.c:219 [inline] do_vfs_ioctl+0x194c/0x26f8 fs/ioctl.c:810 __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:868 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:856 [inline] __arm64_sys_ioctl+0xe4/0x1c8 fs/ioctl.c:856 __invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:38 [inline] invoke_syscall+0x98/0x2c0 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:52 el0_svc_common+0x138/0x258 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:140 do_el0_svc+0x64/0x218 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:204 el0_svc+0x58/0x168 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:637 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xf0 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:655 el0t_64_sync+0x18c/0x190 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:585 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &mm->mmap_lock --> &sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#26 --> &ni->ni_lock/5 Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&ni->ni_lock/5); lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#26); lock(&ni->ni_lock/5); lock(&mm->mmap_lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by syz.1.143/4917: #0: ffff0000e161f700 (&ni->ni_lock/5){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ni_lock fs/ntfs3/ntfs_fs.h:1101 [inline] #0: ffff0000e161f700 (&ni->ni_lock/5){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ntfs_fiemap+0xec/0x168 fs/ntfs3/file.c:1244 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 4917 Comm: syz.1.143 Not tainted 6.1.116-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/13/2024 Call trace: dump_backtrace+0x1c8/0x1f4 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:158 show_stack+0x2c/0x3c arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:165 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x108/0x170 lib/dump_stack.c:106 dump_stack+0x1c/0x58 lib/dump_stack.c:113 print_circular_bug+0x150/0x1b8 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2048 check_noncircular+0x2cc/0x378 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2170 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3090 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3209 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3825 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x3338/0x7680 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5049 lock_acquire+0x26c/0x7cc kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5662 __might_fault+0xc4/0x124 mm/memory.c:5851 _copy_to_user include/linux/uaccess.h:143 [inline] copy_to_user include/linux/uaccess.h:169 [inline] ni_fiemap+0x1134/0x1444 fs/ntfs3/frecord.c:2140 ntfs_fiemap+0x110/0x168 fs/ntfs3/file.c:1246 ioctl_fiemap fs/ioctl.c:219 [inline] do_vfs_ioctl+0x194c/0x26f8 fs/ioctl.c:810 __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:868 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:856 [inline] __arm64_sys_ioctl+0xe4/0x1c8 fs/ioctl.c:856 __invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:38 [inline] invoke_syscall+0x98/0x2c0 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:52 el0_svc_common+0x138/0x258 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:140 do_el0_svc+0x64/0x218 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:204 el0_svc+0x58/0x168 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:637 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xf0 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:655 el0t_64_sync+0x18c/0x190 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:585