====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 4.14.78+ #28 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz-executor2/11851 is trying to acquire lock: (&sig->cred_guard_mutex){+.+.}, at: [] do_io_accounting+0x1d7/0x770 fs/proc/base.c:2731 but task is already holding lock: (&p->lock){+.+.}, at: [] seq_read+0xd4/0x11d0 fs/seq_file.c:165 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (&p->lock){+.+.}: __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:756 [inline] __mutex_lock+0xf5/0x1480 kernel/locking/mutex.c:893 seq_read+0xd4/0x11d0 fs/seq_file.c:165 proc_reg_read+0xef/0x170 fs/proc/inode.c:217 do_loop_readv_writev fs/read_write.c:698 [inline] do_iter_read+0x3cc/0x580 fs/read_write.c:922 vfs_readv+0xe6/0x150 fs/read_write.c:984 kernel_readv fs/splice.c:361 [inline] default_file_splice_read+0x495/0x860 fs/splice.c:416 do_splice_to+0x102/0x150 fs/splice.c:880 do_splice fs/splice.c:1173 [inline] SYSC_splice fs/splice.c:1402 [inline] SyS_splice+0xf4d/0x12a0 fs/splice.c:1382 do_syscall_64+0x19b/0x4b0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:289 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x42/0xb7 -> #1 (&pipe->mutex/1){+.+.}: __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:756 [inline] __mutex_lock+0xf5/0x1480 kernel/locking/mutex.c:893 __pipe_lock fs/pipe.c:88 [inline] fifo_open+0x156/0x9d0 fs/pipe.c:921 do_dentry_open+0x426/0xda0 fs/open.c:764 vfs_open+0x11c/0x210 fs/open.c:878 do_last fs/namei.c:3408 [inline] path_openat+0x4eb/0x23a0 fs/namei.c:3550 do_filp_open+0x197/0x270 fs/namei.c:3584 do_open_execat+0x10d/0x5b0 fs/exec.c:849 do_execveat_common.isra.14+0x6cb/0x1d60 fs/exec.c:1740 do_execve fs/exec.c:1847 [inline] SYSC_execve fs/exec.c:1928 [inline] SyS_execve+0x34/0x40 fs/exec.c:1923 do_syscall_64+0x19b/0x4b0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:289 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x42/0xb7 -> #0 (&sig->cred_guard_mutex){+.+.}: lock_acquire+0x10f/0x380 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3991 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:756 [inline] __mutex_lock+0xf5/0x1480 kernel/locking/mutex.c:893 do_io_accounting+0x1d7/0x770 fs/proc/base.c:2731 proc_single_show+0xf1/0x160 fs/proc/base.c:762 seq_read+0x4e0/0x11d0 fs/seq_file.c:237 __vfs_read+0xf4/0x5b0 fs/read_write.c:411 vfs_read+0x11e/0x330 fs/read_write.c:447 SYSC_pread64 fs/read_write.c:615 [inline] SyS_pread64+0x136/0x160 fs/read_write.c:602 do_syscall_64+0x19b/0x4b0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:289 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x42/0xb7 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &sig->cred_guard_mutex --> &pipe->mutex/1 --> &p->lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&p->lock); lock(&pipe->mutex/1); lock(&p->lock); lock(&sig->cred_guard_mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by syz-executor2/11851: #0: (&p->lock){+.+.}, at: [] seq_read+0xd4/0x11d0 fs/seq_file.c:165 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 11851 Comm: syz-executor2 Not tainted 4.14.78+ #28 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:17 [inline] dump_stack+0xb9/0x11b lib/dump_stack.c:53 print_circular_bug.isra.18.cold.43+0x2d3/0x40c kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1258 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1901 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2018 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2460 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x2ff9/0x4320 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3487 lock_acquire+0x10f/0x380 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3991 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:756 [inline] __mutex_lock+0xf5/0x1480 kernel/locking/mutex.c:893 do_io_accounting+0x1d7/0x770 fs/proc/base.c:2731 proc_single_show+0xf1/0x160 fs/proc/base.c:762 seq_read+0x4e0/0x11d0 fs/seq_file.c:237 __vfs_read+0xf4/0x5b0 fs/read_write.c:411 vfs_read+0x11e/0x330 fs/read_write.c:447 SYSC_pread64 fs/read_write.c:615 [inline] SyS_pread64+0x136/0x160 fs/read_write.c:602 do_syscall_64+0x19b/0x4b0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:289 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x42/0xb7 RIP: 0033:0x457569 RSP: 002b:00007fc0e7beec78 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000011 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000004 RCX: 0000000000457569 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000020000080 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 000000000072bfa0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007fc0e7bef6d4 R13: 00000000004c32f1 R14: 00000000004d4f30 R15: 00000000ffffffff SELinux: unrecognized netlink message: protocol=0 nlmsg_type=0 sclass=netlink_route_socket pig=11853 comm=syz-executor0 FAT-fs (loop5): Unrecognized mount option "" or missing value SELinux: unrecognized netlink message: protocol=0 nlmsg_type=0 sclass=netlink_route_socket pig=11853 comm=syz-executor0 audit: type=1400 audit(1541496533.833:76): avc: denied { getattr } for pid=11914 comm="syz-executor2" scontext=unconfined_u:system_r:insmod_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 tcontext=unconfined_u:system_r:insmod_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 tclass=netlink_netfilter_socket permissive=1 FAT-fs (loop5): Unrecognized mount option "" or missing value audit: type=1400 audit(1541496534.513:77): avc: denied { map_read map_write } for pid=11964 comm="syz-executor2" scontext=unconfined_u:system_r:insmod_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 tcontext=unconfined_u:system_r:insmod_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 tclass=bpf permissive=1 SELinux: unrecognized netlink message: protocol=0 nlmsg_type=27 sclass=netlink_route_socket pig=12020 comm=syz-executor2 SELinux: unrecognized netlink message: protocol=0 nlmsg_type=27 sclass=netlink_route_socket pig=12037 comm=syz-executor2 audit: type=1400 audit(1541496536.846:78): avc: denied { module_load } for pid=12132 comm="syz-executor1" scontext=unconfined_u:system_r:insmod_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 tcontext=unconfined_u:system_r:insmod_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 tclass=system permissive=1 input: syz0 as /devices/virtual/input/input34 SELinux: Context system_u:object_r:netlabel_mgmt_exec_t:s0- is not valid (left unmapped). input: syz0 as /devices/virtual/input/input35 input: syz0 as /devices/virtual/input/input36 input: syz0 as /devices/virtual/input/input37 loop1: p1 p2 p3 p4 < > binder: 12354:12365 unknown command 4219648 binder: 12354:12365 ioctl c0306201 20000440 returned -22 binder: 12354:12379 unknown command 4219648 binder: 12354:12379 ioctl c0306201 20000440 returned -22 binder: 12389:12391 ioctl c0306201 20000000 returned -14 audit: type=1400 audit(1541496540.026:79): avc: denied { write } for pid=12399 comm="syz-executor0" path="socket:[31059]" dev="sockfs" ino=31059 scontext=unconfined_u:system_r:insmod_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 tcontext=system_u:system_r:kernel_t:s0 tclass=sock_file permissive=1 netlink: 4 bytes leftover after parsing attributes in process `syz-executor0'. loop1: p1 p2 p3 p4 < > device lo entered promiscuous mode Y4`Ҙ: renamed from lo input: syz1 as /devices/virtual/input/input38 input: syz1 as /devices/virtual/input/input39 netlink: 4 bytes leftover after parsing attributes in process `syz-executor0'.