REISERFS (device loop5): Using tea hash to sort names REISERFS (device loop5): Created .reiserfs_priv - reserved for xattr storage. ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.6.0-next-20231103-syzkaller #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz-executor.5/12216 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8880762b96c0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#18){++++}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:802 [inline] ffff8880762b96c0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#18){++++}-{3:3}, at: open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3543 [inline] ffff8880762b96c0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#18){++++}-{3:3}, at: path_openat+0x9ef/0x2c40 fs/namei.c:3776 but task is already holding lock: ffff88807ed62418 (sb_writers#26){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3535 [inline] ffff88807ed62418 (sb_writers#26){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: path_openat+0x1968/0x2c40 fs/namei.c:3776 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (sb_writers#26){.+.+}-{0:0}: percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline] __sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1635 [inline] sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1710 [inline] mnt_want_write_file+0x98/0x600 fs/namespace.c:448 reiserfs_ioctl+0x194/0x2e0 fs/reiserfs/ioctl.c:103 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:871 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:857 [inline] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x18f/0x210 fs/ioctl.c:857 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x3f/0x110 arch/x86/entry/common.c:82 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x62/0x6a -> #1 (&sbi->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:603 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x181/0x1330 kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 reiserfs_write_lock+0x78/0x100 fs/reiserfs/lock.c:27 reiserfs_lookup+0x184/0x690 fs/reiserfs/namei.c:364 __lookup_slow+0x24d/0x450 fs/namei.c:1694 lookup_one_len+0x17d/0x1b0 fs/namei.c:2746 reiserfs_lookup_privroot+0x94/0x200 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:977 reiserfs_fill_super+0x1ab6/0x3150 fs/reiserfs/super.c:2192 mount_bdev+0x1df/0x2d0 fs/super.c:1650 legacy_get_tree+0x109/0x220 fs/fs_context.c:662 vfs_get_tree+0x8c/0x370 fs/super.c:1771 do_new_mount fs/namespace.c:3337 [inline] path_mount+0x148e/0x1ed0 fs/namespace.c:3664 do_mount fs/namespace.c:3677 [inline] __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3886 [inline] __se_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3863 [inline] __x64_sys_mount+0x293/0x310 fs/namespace.c:3863 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x3f/0x110 arch/x86/entry/common.c:82 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x62/0x6a -> #0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#18){++++}-{3:3}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3868 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x2e22/0x5dc0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5136 lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5753 [inline] lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x530 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5718 down_write+0x93/0x200 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1579 inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:802 [inline] open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3543 [inline] path_openat+0x9ef/0x2c40 fs/namei.c:3776 do_filp_open+0x1dc/0x430 fs/namei.c:3809 do_sys_openat2+0x176/0x1e0 fs/open.c:1440 do_sys_open fs/open.c:1455 [inline] __do_sys_openat fs/open.c:1471 [inline] __se_sys_openat fs/open.c:1466 [inline] __x64_sys_openat+0x175/0x210 fs/open.c:1466 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x3f/0x110 arch/x86/entry/common.c:82 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x62/0x6a other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &type->i_mutex_dir_key#18 --> &sbi->lock --> sb_writers#26 Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- rlock(sb_writers#26); lock(&sbi->lock); lock(sb_writers#26); lock(&type->i_mutex_dir_key#18); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by syz-executor.5/12216: #0: ffff88807ed62418 (sb_writers#26){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3535 [inline] #0: ffff88807ed62418 (sb_writers#26){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: path_openat+0x1968/0x2c40 fs/namei.c:3776 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 12216 Comm: syz-executor.5 Not tainted 6.6.0-next-20231103-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/09/2023 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0xd9/0x1b0 lib/dump_stack.c:106 check_noncircular+0x310/0x3f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2187 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3868 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x2e22/0x5dc0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5136 lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5753 [inline] lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x530 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5718 down_write+0x93/0x200 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1579 inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:802 [inline] open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3543 [inline] path_openat+0x9ef/0x2c40 fs/namei.c:3776 do_filp_open+0x1dc/0x430 fs/namei.c:3809 do_sys_openat2+0x176/0x1e0 fs/open.c:1440 do_sys_open fs/open.c:1455 [inline] __do_sys_openat fs/open.c:1471 [inline] __se_sys_openat fs/open.c:1466 [inline] __x64_sys_openat+0x175/0x210 fs/open.c:1466 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x3f/0x110 arch/x86/entry/common.c:82 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x62/0x6a RIP: 0033:0x7efede27cae9 Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 e1 20 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007efedeffe0c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000101 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007efede39bf80 RCX: 00007efede27cae9 RDX: 000000000000275a RSI: 00000000200002c0 RDI: ffffffffffffff9c RBP: 00007efede2c847a R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 000000000000000b R14: 00007efede39bf80 R15: 00007fff92ffe8a8