====================================================== [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] 4.9.141+ #1 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------- syz-executor.2/10879 is trying to acquire lock: (&sig->cred_guard_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [] lock_trace+0x44/0xc0 fs/proc/base.c:431 but task is already holding lock: (&p->lock){+.+.+.}, at: [] seq_read+0xdd/0x12d0 fs/seq_file.c:178 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: lock_acquire+0x130/0x3e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3756 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:521 [inline] mutex_lock_nested+0xc0/0x900 kernel/locking/mutex.c:621 seq_read+0xdd/0x12d0 fs/seq_file.c:178 proc_reg_read+0xfd/0x180 fs/proc/inode.c:203 do_loop_readv_writev.part.1+0xd5/0x280 fs/read_write.c:718 do_loop_readv_writev fs/read_write.c:707 [inline] do_readv_writev+0x56e/0x7b0 fs/read_write.c:873 vfs_readv+0x84/0xc0 fs/read_write.c:897 kernel_readv fs/splice.c:363 [inline] default_file_splice_read+0x451/0x7f0 fs/splice.c:435 do_splice_to+0x10c/0x170 fs/splice.c:899 do_splice fs/splice.c:1192 [inline] SYSC_splice fs/splice.c:1416 [inline] SyS_splice+0x10d2/0x14d0 fs/splice.c:1399 do_syscall_64+0x19f/0x550 arch/x86/entry/common.c:285 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_swapgs+0x5d/0xdb lock_acquire+0x130/0x3e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3756 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:521 [inline] mutex_lock_nested+0xc0/0x900 kernel/locking/mutex.c:621 __pipe_lock fs/pipe.c:87 [inline] fifo_open+0x15c/0x9e0 fs/pipe.c:921 do_dentry_open+0x3ef/0xc90 fs/open.c:766 vfs_open+0x11c/0x210 fs/open.c:879 do_last fs/namei.c:3410 [inline] path_openat+0x542/0x2790 fs/namei.c:3534 do_filp_open+0x197/0x270 fs/namei.c:3568 do_open_execat+0x10f/0x640 fs/exec.c:844 do_execveat_common.isra.14+0x687/0x1ed0 fs/exec.c:1723 do_execve fs/exec.c:1829 [inline] SYSC_execve fs/exec.c:1910 [inline] SyS_execve+0x42/0x50 fs/exec.c:1905 do_syscall_64+0x19f/0x550 arch/x86/entry/common.c:285 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_swapgs+0x5d/0xdb check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1828 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1938 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2265 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x3189/0x4a10 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3345 lock_acquire+0x130/0x3e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3756 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:521 [inline] mutex_lock_killable_nested+0xcc/0x9f0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:641 lock_trace+0x44/0xc0 fs/proc/base.c:431 proc_pid_syscall+0xa9/0x260 fs/proc/base.c:663 proc_single_show+0xfd/0x170 fs/proc/base.c:785 seq_read+0x4b6/0x12d0 fs/seq_file.c:240 do_loop_readv_writev.part.1+0xd5/0x280 fs/read_write.c:718 do_loop_readv_writev fs/read_write.c:707 [inline] do_readv_writev+0x56e/0x7b0 fs/read_write.c:873 vfs_readv+0x84/0xc0 fs/read_write.c:897 kernel_readv fs/splice.c:363 [inline] default_file_splice_read+0x451/0x7f0 fs/splice.c:435 do_splice_to+0x10c/0x170 fs/splice.c:899 splice_direct_to_actor+0x23f/0x7e0 fs/splice.c:971 do_splice_direct+0x1a3/0x270 fs/splice.c:1080 do_sendfile+0x4f0/0xc30 fs/read_write.c:1393 SYSC_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1454 [inline] SyS_sendfile64+0x144/0x160 fs/read_write.c:1440 do_syscall_64+0x19f/0x550 arch/x86/entry/common.c:285 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_swapgs+0x5d/0xdb other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&p->lock); lock(&pipe->mutex/1); lock(&p->lock); lock(&sig->cred_guard_mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 2 locks held by syz-executor.2/10879: #0: (sb_writers#7){.+.+.+}, at: [] file_start_write include/linux/fs.h:2640 [inline] #0: (sb_writers#7){.+.+.+}, at: [] do_sendfile+0xa80/0xc30 fs/read_write.c:1392 #1: (&p->lock){+.+.+.}, at: [] seq_read+0xdd/0x12d0 fs/seq_file.c:178 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 10879 Comm: syz-executor.2 Not tainted 4.9.141+ #1 ffff8801ca23ee38 ffffffff81b42e79 ffffffff83ca9f30 ffffffff83ca4fe0 ffffffff83ca2fd0 ffff8801cad35038 ffff8801cad34740 ffff8801ca23ee80 ffffffff813fee40 0000000000000002 00000000cad35018 0000000000000002 Call Trace: [] __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:15 [inline] [] dump_stack+0xc1/0x128 lib/dump_stack.c:51 [] print_circular_bug.cold.36+0x2f7/0x432 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1202 [] check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1828 [inline] [] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1938 [inline] [] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2265 [inline] [] __lock_acquire+0x3189/0x4a10 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3345 [] lock_acquire+0x130/0x3e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3756 [] __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:521 [inline] [] mutex_lock_killable_nested+0xcc/0x9f0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:641 [] lock_trace+0x44/0xc0 fs/proc/base.c:431 [] proc_pid_syscall+0xa9/0x260 fs/proc/base.c:663 [] proc_single_show+0xfd/0x170 fs/proc/base.c:785 [] seq_read+0x4b6/0x12d0 fs/seq_file.c:240 [] do_loop_readv_writev.part.1+0xd5/0x280 fs/read_write.c:718 [] do_loop_readv_writev fs/read_write.c:707 [inline] [] do_readv_writev+0x56e/0x7b0 fs/read_write.c:873 [] vfs_readv+0x84/0xc0 fs/read_write.c:897 [] kernel_readv fs/splice.c:363 [inline] [] default_file_splice_read+0x451/0x7f0 fs/splice.c:435 [] do_splice_to+0x10c/0x170 fs/splice.c:899 [] splice_direct_to_actor+0x23f/0x7e0 fs/splice.c:971 [] do_splice_direct+0x1a3/0x270 fs/splice.c:1080 [] do_sendfile+0x4f0/0xc30 fs/read_write.c:1393 [] SYSC_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1454 [inline] [] SyS_sendfile64+0x144/0x160 fs/read_write.c:1440 [] do_syscall_64+0x19f/0x550 arch/x86/entry/common.c:285 [] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_swapgs+0x5d/0xdb selinux_nlmsg_perm: 4656 callbacks suppressed SELinux: unrecognized netlink message: protocol=0 nlmsg_type=32256 sclass=netlink_route_socket pig=10911 comm=syz-executor.1 SELinux: unrecognized netlink message: protocol=0 nlmsg_type=1586 sclass=netlink_route_socket pig=10911 comm=syz-executor.1 nla_parse: 3 callbacks suppressed netlink: 8 bytes leftover after parsing attributes in process `syz-executor.0'. binder: 10967:10968 BC_FREE_BUFFER u0000000000000000 no match SELinux: unrecognized netlink message: protocol=0 nlmsg_type=0 sclass=netlink_route_socket pig=11015 comm=syz-executor.4 A link change request failed with some changes committed already. Interface lo may have been left with an inconsistent configuration, please check. A link change request failed with some changes committed already. Interface lo may have been left with an inconsistent configuration, please check. SELinux: unrecognized netlink message: protocol=0 nlmsg_type=0 sclass=netlink_route_socket pig=11003 comm=syz-executor.4 SELinux: unrecognized netlink message: protocol=0 nlmsg_type=0 sclass=netlink_route_socket pig=11098 comm=syz-executor.3 SELinux: unrecognized netlink message: protocol=0 nlmsg_type=0 sclass=netlink_route_socket pig=11098 comm=syz-executor.3 SELinux: unrecognized netlink message: protocol=0 nlmsg_type=0 sclass=netlink_route_socket pig=11098 comm=syz-executor.3 SELinux: unrecognized netlink message: protocol=0 nlmsg_type=0 sclass=netlink_route_socket pig=11098 comm=syz-executor.3 SELinux: unrecognized netlink message: protocol=0 nlmsg_type=0 sclass=netlink_route_socket pig=11098 comm=syz-executor.3 SELinux: unrecognized netlink message: protocol=0 nlmsg_type=0 sclass=netlink_route_socket pig=11098 comm=syz-executor.3 input: ryz as /devices/virtual/input/input50 input: ryz as /devices/virtual/input/input51 IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): lo: link becomes ready qtaguid: iface_stat: create6(lo): no inet dev EXT4-fs error (device sda1): mb_free_blocks:1471: group 6, inode 16538: block 208928:freeing already freed block (bit 12320); block bitmap corrupt. EXT4-fs error (device sda1): ext4_mb_generate_buddy:759: group 6, block bitmap and bg descriptor inconsistent: 20435 vs 20445 free clusters EXT4-fs (sda1): pa ffff88019a43b798: logic 0, phys. 208928, len 32 EXT4-fs error (device sda1): ext4_mb_release_inode_pa:3818: group 6, free 25, pa_free 15 A link change request failed with some changes committed already. Interface lo may have been left with an inconsistent configuration, please check. IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): lo: link becomes ready qtaguid: iface_stat: create6(lo): no inet dev A link change request failed with some changes committed already. Interface lo may have been left with an inconsistent configuration, please check. netlink: 5 bytes leftover after parsing attributes in process `syz-executor.0'. netlink: 5 bytes leftover after parsing attributes in process `syz-executor.0'.