====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.15.173-syzkaller #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ rcu_preempt/15 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88807d9789b8 (&trie->lock){..-.}-{2:2}, at: trie_delete_elem+0x90/0x690 kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c:450 but task is already holding lock: ffff8880b9028098 (&base->lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: lock_timer_base+0x120/0x260 kernel/time/timer.c:946 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (&base->lock){-.-.}-{2:2}: lock_acquire+0x1db/0x4f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5623 __raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:110 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0xd1/0x120 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:162 lock_timer_base+0x120/0x260 kernel/time/timer.c:946 __mod_timer+0x1d6/0xeb0 kernel/time/timer.c:1019 queue_delayed_work_on+0x156/0x250 kernel/workqueue.c:1715 queue_delayed_work include/linux/workqueue.h:527 [inline] schedule_delayed_work include/linux/workqueue.h:631 [inline] kvfree_call_rcu+0x50e/0x8a0 kernel/rcu/tree.c:3625 rtnl_register_internal+0x443/0x530 net/core/rtnetlink.c:223 rtnl_register+0x32/0x70 net/core/rtnetlink.c:273 ip_rt_init+0x2e6/0x390 net/ipv4/route.c:3750 ip_init+0xa/0x20 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:1749 inet_init+0x27c/0x390 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:2009 do_one_initcall+0x22b/0x7a0 init/main.c:1302 do_initcall_level+0x157/0x210 init/main.c:1375 do_initcalls+0x49/0x90 init/main.c:1391 kernel_init_freeable+0x425/0x5c0 init/main.c:1615 kernel_init+0x19/0x290 init/main.c:1506 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:287 -> #1 (krc.lock){..-.}-{2:2}: lock_acquire+0x1db/0x4f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5623 __raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:142 [inline] _raw_spin_lock+0x2a/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:154 krc_this_cpu_lock kernel/rcu/tree.c:3199 [inline] add_ptr_to_bulk_krc_lock kernel/rcu/tree.c:3506 [inline] kvfree_call_rcu+0x1b5/0x8a0 kernel/rcu/tree.c:3597 trie_update_elem+0x808/0xc00 kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c:384 bpf_map_update_value+0x5d7/0x6c0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:221 generic_map_update_batch+0x54d/0x8b0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:1421 bpf_map_do_batch+0x4d0/0x620 __sys_bpf+0x55c/0x670 __do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4755 [inline] __se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4753 [inline] __x64_sys_bpf+0x78/0x90 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4753 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x66/0xd0 -> #0 (&trie->lock){..-.}-{2:2}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3053 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3172 [inline] validate_chain+0x1649/0x5930 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3788 __lock_acquire+0x1295/0x1ff0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5012 lock_acquire+0x1db/0x4f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5623 __raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:110 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0xd1/0x120 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:162 trie_delete_elem+0x90/0x690 kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c:450 bpf_prog_b9f8cf72c95fdcd7+0x40/0xbf8 bpf_dispatcher_nop_func include/linux/bpf.h:790 [inline] __bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:621 [inline] bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:635 [inline] __bpf_trace_run kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1878 [inline] bpf_trace_run3+0x2ce/0x380 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1916 trace_timer_start include/trace/events/timer.h:52 [inline] enqueue_timer+0x3ae/0x540 kernel/time/timer.c:586 internal_add_timer kernel/time/timer.c:611 [inline] __mod_timer+0xa60/0xeb0 kernel/time/timer.c:1062 schedule_timeout+0x1b4/0x300 kernel/time/timer.c:1913 rcu_gp_fqs_loop+0x2bf/0x1080 kernel/rcu/tree.c:1972 rcu_gp_kthread+0xa4/0x360 kernel/rcu/tree.c:2145 kthread+0x3f6/0x4f0 kernel/kthread.c:334 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:287 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &trie->lock --> krc.lock --> &base->lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&base->lock); lock(krc.lock); lock(&base->lock); lock(&trie->lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 2 locks held by rcu_preempt/15: #0: ffff8880b9028098 (&base->lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: lock_timer_base+0x120/0x260 kernel/time/timer.c:946 #1: ffffffff8c91fc60 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire+0x5/0x30 include/linux/rcupdate.h:311 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 15 Comm: rcu_preempt Not tainted 5.15.173-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/30/2024 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x1e3/0x2d0 lib/dump_stack.c:106 check_noncircular+0x2f8/0x3b0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2133 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3053 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3172 [inline] validate_chain+0x1649/0x5930 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3788 __lock_acquire+0x1295/0x1ff0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5012 lock_acquire+0x1db/0x4f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5623 __raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:110 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0xd1/0x120 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:162 trie_delete_elem+0x90/0x690 kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c:450 bpf_prog_b9f8cf72c95fdcd7+0x40/0xbf8 bpf_dispatcher_nop_func include/linux/bpf.h:790 [inline] __bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:621 [inline] bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:635 [inline] __bpf_trace_run kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1878 [inline] bpf_trace_run3+0x2ce/0x380 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1916 trace_timer_start include/trace/events/timer.h:52 [inline] enqueue_timer+0x3ae/0x540 kernel/time/timer.c:586 internal_add_timer kernel/time/timer.c:611 [inline] __mod_timer+0xa60/0xeb0 kernel/time/timer.c:1062 schedule_timeout+0x1b4/0x300 kernel/time/timer.c:1913 rcu_gp_fqs_loop+0x2bf/0x1080 kernel/rcu/tree.c:1972 rcu_gp_kthread+0xa4/0x360 kernel/rcu/tree.c:2145 kthread+0x3f6/0x4f0 kernel/kthread.c:334 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:287