====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.5.0-syzkaller #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz-executor.3/10268 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88804341d1e0 (&ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth]){++++}, at: inode_lock_shared include/linux/fs.h:801 [inline] ffff88804341d1e0 (&ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth]){++++}, at: lookup_slow fs/namei.c:1773 [inline] ffff88804341d1e0 (&ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth]){++++}, at: lookup_one_len_unlocked+0xd2/0x1d0 fs/namei.c:2690 but task is already holding lock: ffff8880a1beb220 (&ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth]#2){++++}, at: inode_lock_shared include/linux/fs.h:801 [inline] ffff8880a1beb220 (&ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth]#2){++++}, at: do_last fs/namei.c:3400 [inline] ffff8880a1beb220 (&ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth]#2){++++}, at: path_openat+0xbb7/0x4380 fs/namei.c:3607 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #4 (&ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth]#2){++++}: lock_acquire+0x154/0x250 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4484 down_read+0x39/0x50 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1495 inode_lock_shared include/linux/fs.h:801 [inline] do_last fs/namei.c:3400 [inline] path_openat+0xbb7/0x4380 fs/namei.c:3607 do_filp_open+0x192/0x3d0 fs/namei.c:3637 do_open_execat+0xff/0x620 fs/exec.c:860 __do_execve_file+0x758/0x1ca0 fs/exec.c:1765 do_execveat_common fs/exec.c:1871 [inline] do_execve fs/exec.c:1888 [inline] __do_sys_execve fs/exec.c:1964 [inline] __se_sys_execve fs/exec.c:1959 [inline] __x64_sys_execve+0x94/0xb0 fs/exec.c:1959 do_syscall_64+0xf7/0x1c0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:294 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe -> #3 (&sig->cred_guard_mutex){+.+.}: lock_acquire+0x154/0x250 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4484 __mutex_lock_common+0x16e/0x2f30 kernel/locking/mutex.c:956 __mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:1103 [inline] mutex_lock_killable_nested+0x1b/0x30 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1133 do_io_accounting fs/proc/base.c:2864 [inline] proc_tgid_io_accounting+0x16a/0x570 fs/proc/base.c:2913 proc_single_show+0xe7/0x180 fs/proc/base.c:758 seq_read+0x4d8/0xdb0 fs/seq_file.c:229 do_loop_readv_writev fs/read_write.c:714 [inline] do_iter_read+0x4a2/0x5b0 fs/read_write.c:935 vfs_readv+0xc2/0x120 fs/read_write.c:997 kernel_readv fs/splice.c:365 [inline] default_file_splice_read+0x579/0xa40 fs/splice.c:422 do_splice_to fs/splice.c:892 [inline] splice_direct_to_actor+0x3c9/0xb90 fs/splice.c:971 do_splice_direct+0x200/0x330 fs/splice.c:1080 do_sendfile+0x7e4/0xfd0 fs/read_write.c:1464 __do_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1525 [inline] __se_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1511 [inline] __x64_sys_sendfile64+0x176/0x1b0 fs/read_write.c:1511 do_syscall_64+0xf7/0x1c0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:294 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe -> #2 (&p->lock){+.+.}: lock_acquire+0x154/0x250 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4484 __mutex_lock_common+0x16e/0x2f30 kernel/locking/mutex.c:956 __mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:1103 [inline] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1118 seq_read+0x6b/0xdb0 fs/seq_file.c:161 do_loop_readv_writev fs/read_write.c:714 [inline] do_iter_read+0x4a2/0x5b0 fs/read_write.c:935 vfs_readv+0xc2/0x120 fs/read_write.c:997 kernel_readv fs/splice.c:365 [inline] default_file_splice_read+0x579/0xa40 fs/splice.c:422 do_splice_to fs/splice.c:892 [inline] splice_direct_to_actor+0x3c9/0xb90 fs/splice.c:971 do_splice_direct+0x200/0x330 fs/splice.c:1080 do_sendfile+0x7e4/0xfd0 fs/read_write.c:1464 __do_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1525 [inline] __se_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1511 [inline] __x64_sys_sendfile64+0x176/0x1b0 fs/read_write.c:1511 do_syscall_64+0xf7/0x1c0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:294 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe -> #1 (sb_writers#3){.+.+}: lock_acquire+0x154/0x250 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4484 percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:40 [inline] __sb_start_write+0x189/0x420 fs/super.c:1674 sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1650 [inline] mnt_want_write+0x4a/0xa0 fs/namespace.c:354 ovl_want_write+0x77/0x80 fs/overlayfs/util.c:21 ovl_create_object+0xaf/0x2d0 fs/overlayfs/dir.c:596 ovl_create+0x29/0x30 fs/overlayfs/dir.c:627 lookup_open fs/namei.c:3309 [inline] do_last fs/namei.c:3401 [inline] path_openat+0x230c/0x4380 fs/namei.c:3607 do_filp_open+0x192/0x3d0 fs/namei.c:3637 do_sys_openat2+0x42b/0x6f0 fs/open.c:1149 do_sys_open fs/open.c:1165 [inline] ksys_open include/linux/syscalls.h:1386 [inline] __do_sys_creat fs/open.c:1233 [inline] __se_sys_creat fs/open.c:1231 [inline] __x64_sys_creat+0xd5/0x100 fs/open.c:1231 do_syscall_64+0xf7/0x1c0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:294 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe -> #0 (&ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth]){++++}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2475 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2580 [inline] validate_chain+0x1507/0x7be0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2970 __lock_acquire+0xc5a/0x1bc0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3954 lock_acquire+0x154/0x250 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4484 down_read+0x39/0x50 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1495 inode_lock_shared include/linux/fs.h:801 [inline] lookup_slow fs/namei.c:1773 [inline] lookup_one_len_unlocked+0xd2/0x1d0 fs/namei.c:2690 lookup_positive_unlocked+0x25/0xb0 fs/namei.c:2706 ovl_lookup_single+0x67/0x830 fs/overlayfs/namei.c:203 ovl_lookup_layer+0x3b1/0x470 fs/overlayfs/namei.c:287 ovl_lookup+0x843/0x1c60 fs/overlayfs/namei.c:902 lookup_open fs/namei.c:3288 [inline] do_last fs/namei.c:3401 [inline] path_openat+0x1b73/0x4380 fs/namei.c:3607 do_filp_open+0x192/0x3d0 fs/namei.c:3637 do_open_execat+0xff/0x620 fs/exec.c:860 __do_execve_file+0x758/0x1ca0 fs/exec.c:1765 do_execveat_common fs/exec.c:1871 [inline] do_execve fs/exec.c:1888 [inline] __do_sys_execve fs/exec.c:1964 [inline] __se_sys_execve fs/exec.c:1959 [inline] __x64_sys_execve+0x94/0xb0 fs/exec.c:1959 do_syscall_64+0xf7/0x1c0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:294 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth] --> &sig->cred_guard_mutex --> &ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth]#2 Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth]#2); lock(&sig->cred_guard_mutex); lock(&ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth]#2); lock(&ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth]); *** DEADLOCK *** 2 locks held by syz-executor.3/10268: #0: ffff8880981fd310 (&sig->cred_guard_mutex){+.+.}, at: prepare_bprm_creds fs/exec.c:1412 [inline] #0: ffff8880981fd310 (&sig->cred_guard_mutex){+.+.}, at: __do_execve_file+0x2c4/0x1ca0 fs/exec.c:1757 #1: ffff8880a1beb220 (&ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth]#2){++++}, at: inode_lock_shared include/linux/fs.h:801 [inline] #1: ffff8880a1beb220 (&ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth]#2){++++}, at: do_last fs/namei.c:3400 [inline] #1: ffff8880a1beb220 (&ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth]#2){++++}, at: path_openat+0xbb7/0x4380 fs/namei.c:3607 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 10268 Comm: syz-executor.3 Not tainted 5.5.0-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline] dump_stack+0x1fb/0x318 lib/dump_stack.c:118 print_circular_bug+0xc3f/0xe70 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1684 check_noncircular+0x206/0x3a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1808 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2475 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2580 [inline] validate_chain+0x1507/0x7be0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2970 __lock_acquire+0xc5a/0x1bc0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3954 lock_acquire+0x154/0x250 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4484 down_read+0x39/0x50 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1495 inode_lock_shared include/linux/fs.h:801 [inline] lookup_slow fs/namei.c:1773 [inline] lookup_one_len_unlocked+0xd2/0x1d0 fs/namei.c:2690 lookup_positive_unlocked+0x25/0xb0 fs/namei.c:2706 ovl_lookup_single+0x67/0x830 fs/overlayfs/namei.c:203 ovl_lookup_layer+0x3b1/0x470 fs/overlayfs/namei.c:287 ovl_lookup+0x843/0x1c60 fs/overlayfs/namei.c:902 lookup_open fs/namei.c:3288 [inline] do_last fs/namei.c:3401 [inline] path_openat+0x1b73/0x4380 fs/namei.c:3607 do_filp_open+0x192/0x3d0 fs/namei.c:3637 do_open_execat+0xff/0x620 fs/exec.c:860 __do_execve_file+0x758/0x1ca0 fs/exec.c:1765 do_execveat_common fs/exec.c:1871 [inline] do_execve fs/exec.c:1888 [inline] __do_sys_execve fs/exec.c:1964 [inline] __se_sys_execve fs/exec.c:1959 [inline] __x64_sys_execve+0x94/0xb0 fs/exec.c:1959 do_syscall_64+0xf7/0x1c0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:294 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe RIP: 0033:0x45b399 Code: ad b6 fb ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 66 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 0f 83 7b b6 fb ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 RSP: 002b:00007f1f29fc2c78 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000003b RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f1f29fc36d4 RCX: 000000000045b399 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000020000280 RBP: 000000000075bf20 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000ffffffff R13: 00000000000000a2 R14: 00000000004c1eb2 R15: 000000000075bf2c