REISERFS (device loop1): using 3.5.x disk format REISERFS (device loop1): Created .reiserfs_priv - reserved for xattr storage. ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.4.0-rc5-syzkaller-gf86b85033b8c #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz-executor.1/10487 is trying to acquire lock: ffff0000dae98090 (&sbi->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: reiserfs_write_lock+0x7c/0xe8 fs/reiserfs/lock.c:27 but task is already holding lock: ffff00011c238980 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#17/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock_nested include/linux/fs.h:810 [inline] ffff00011c238980 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#17/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: filename_create+0x204/0x468 fs/namei.c:3884 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#17/1){+.+.}-{3:3}: down_write_nested+0x58/0xcc kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1689 inode_lock_nested include/linux/fs.h:810 [inline] filename_create+0x204/0x468 fs/namei.c:3884 do_mkdirat+0xac/0x610 fs/namei.c:4130 __do_sys_mkdirat fs/namei.c:4153 [inline] __se_sys_mkdirat fs/namei.c:4151 [inline] __arm64_sys_mkdirat+0x90/0xa8 fs/namei.c:4151 __invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:38 [inline] invoke_syscall+0x98/0x2c0 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:52 el0_svc_common+0x138/0x244 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:142 do_el0_svc+0x64/0x198 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:191 el0_svc+0x4c/0x160 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:647 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xfc arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:665 el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:591 -> #1 (sb_writers#23){.+.+}-{0:0}: percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline] __sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1494 [inline] sb_start_write+0x60/0x2ec include/linux/fs.h:1569 mnt_want_write_file+0x64/0x1e8 fs/namespace.c:438 reiserfs_ioctl+0x184/0x454 fs/reiserfs/ioctl.c:103 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:870 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:856 [inline] __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x14c/0x1c8 fs/ioctl.c:856 __invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:38 [inline] invoke_syscall+0x98/0x2c0 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:52 el0_svc_common+0x138/0x244 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:142 do_el0_svc+0x64/0x198 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:191 el0_svc+0x4c/0x160 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:647 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xfc arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:665 el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:591 -> #0 (&sbi->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3113 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3232 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3847 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x3308/0x7604 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5088 lock_acquire+0x23c/0x71c kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5705 __mutex_lock_common+0x190/0x21a0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:603 __mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 [inline] mutex_lock_nested+0x2c/0x38 kernel/locking/mutex.c:799 reiserfs_write_lock+0x7c/0xe8 fs/reiserfs/lock.c:27 reiserfs_lookup+0x128/0x45c fs/reiserfs/namei.c:364 lookup_one_qstr_excl+0x108/0x230 fs/namei.c:1605 filename_create+0x230/0x468 fs/namei.c:3885 do_mkdirat+0xac/0x610 fs/namei.c:4130 __do_sys_mkdirat fs/namei.c:4153 [inline] __se_sys_mkdirat fs/namei.c:4151 [inline] __arm64_sys_mkdirat+0x90/0xa8 fs/namei.c:4151 __invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:38 [inline] invoke_syscall+0x98/0x2c0 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:52 el0_svc_common+0x138/0x244 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:142 do_el0_svc+0x64/0x198 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:191 el0_svc+0x4c/0x160 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:647 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xfc arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:665 el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:591 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &sbi->lock --> sb_writers#23 --> &type->i_mutex_dir_key#17/1 Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&type->i_mutex_dir_key#17/1); lock(sb_writers#23); lock(&type->i_mutex_dir_key#17/1); lock(&sbi->lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 2 locks held by syz-executor.1/10487: #0: ffff0000cfabe460 (sb_writers#23){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write+0x44/0x9c fs/namespace.c:394 #1: ffff00011c238980 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#17/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock_nested include/linux/fs.h:810 [inline] #1: ffff00011c238980 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#17/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: filename_create+0x204/0x468 fs/namei.c:3884 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 10487 Comm: syz-executor.1 Not tainted 6.4.0-rc5-syzkaller-gf86b85033b8c #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 05/25/2023 Call trace: dump_backtrace+0x1b8/0x1e4 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:233 show_stack+0x2c/0x44 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:240 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0xd0/0x124 lib/dump_stack.c:106 dump_stack+0x1c/0x28 lib/dump_stack.c:113 print_circular_bug+0x150/0x1b8 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2066 check_noncircular+0x2cc/0x378 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2188 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3113 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3232 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3847 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x3308/0x7604 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5088 lock_acquire+0x23c/0x71c kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5705 __mutex_lock_common+0x190/0x21a0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:603 __mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 [inline] mutex_lock_nested+0x2c/0x38 kernel/locking/mutex.c:799 reiserfs_write_lock+0x7c/0xe8 fs/reiserfs/lock.c:27 reiserfs_lookup+0x128/0x45c fs/reiserfs/namei.c:364 lookup_one_qstr_excl+0x108/0x230 fs/namei.c:1605 filename_create+0x230/0x468 fs/namei.c:3885 do_mkdirat+0xac/0x610 fs/namei.c:4130 __do_sys_mkdirat fs/namei.c:4153 [inline] __se_sys_mkdirat fs/namei.c:4151 [inline] __arm64_sys_mkdirat+0x90/0xa8 fs/namei.c:4151 __invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:38 [inline] invoke_syscall+0x98/0x2c0 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:52 el0_svc_common+0x138/0x244 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:142 do_el0_svc+0x64/0x198 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:191 el0_svc+0x4c/0x160 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:647 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xfc arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:665 el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:591 overlayfs: upper fs needs to support d_type. overlayfs: upper fs does not support tmpfile. overlayfs: upper fs does not support RENAME_WHITEOUT. overlayfs: failed to set xattr on upper overlayfs: ...falling back to index=off,metacopy=off.