====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.15.0-rc2-syzkaller #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz-executor.1/4633 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8880238c9e38 (&u->lock/1){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: sk_diag_dump_icons net/unix/diag.c:86 [inline] ffff8880238c9e38 (&u->lock/1){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: sk_diag_fill+0xaa7/0x1100 net/unix/diag.c:154 but task is already holding lock: ffff888039c4b9a0 (rlock-AF_UNIX){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:363 [inline] ffff888039c4b9a0 (rlock-AF_UNIX){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: sk_diag_dump_icons net/unix/diag.c:68 [inline] ffff888039c4b9a0 (rlock-AF_UNIX){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: sk_diag_fill+0x9bb/0x1100 net/unix/diag.c:154 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (rlock-AF_UNIX){+.+.}-{2:2}: __raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:110 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x39/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:162 skb_queue_tail+0x21/0x140 net/core/skbuff.c:3309 unix_dgram_sendmsg+0xf60/0x1950 net/unix/af_unix.c:1902 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:704 [inline] sock_sendmsg+0xcf/0x120 net/socket.c:724 io_send+0x4ad/0x580 fs/io_uring.c:4818 io_issue_sqe+0xf7e/0x6ba0 fs/io_uring.c:6669 __io_queue_sqe+0x90/0xb50 fs/io_uring.c:6952 io_queue_sqe fs/io_uring.c:7003 [inline] io_submit_sqe fs/io_uring.c:7179 [inline] io_submit_sqes+0x205c/0x9770 fs/io_uring.c:7285 __do_sys_io_uring_enter+0xf55/0x1f00 fs/io_uring.c:9943 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #0 (&u->lock/1){+.+.}-{2:2}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3051 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3174 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3789 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x2a07/0x54a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5015 lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5625 [inline] lock_acquire+0x1ab/0x510 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5590 _raw_spin_lock_nested+0x30/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:368 sk_diag_dump_icons net/unix/diag.c:86 [inline] sk_diag_fill+0xaa7/0x1100 net/unix/diag.c:154 sk_diag_dump net/unix/diag.c:192 [inline] unix_diag_dump+0x399/0x590 net/unix/diag.c:220 netlink_dump+0x4b9/0xb70 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2278 __netlink_dump_start+0x642/0x900 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2383 netlink_dump_start include/linux/netlink.h:258 [inline] unix_diag_handler_dump+0x411/0x7d0 net/unix/diag.c:319 __sock_diag_cmd net/core/sock_diag.c:234 [inline] sock_diag_rcv_msg+0x31a/0x440 net/core/sock_diag.c:265 netlink_rcv_skb+0x153/0x420 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2504 sock_diag_rcv+0x26/0x40 net/core/sock_diag.c:276 netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1314 [inline] netlink_unicast+0x533/0x7d0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1340 netlink_sendmsg+0x86d/0xdb0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1929 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:704 [inline] sock_sendmsg+0xcf/0x120 net/socket.c:724 sock_write_iter+0x289/0x3c0 net/socket.c:1057 call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2163 [inline] new_sync_write+0x429/0x660 fs/read_write.c:507 vfs_write+0x7cf/0xae0 fs/read_write.c:594 ksys_write+0x1ee/0x250 fs/read_write.c:647 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(rlock-AF_UNIX); lock(&u->lock/1); lock(rlock-AF_UNIX); lock(&u->lock/1); *** DEADLOCK *** 5 locks held by syz-executor.1/4633: #0: ffffffff8d0ec748 (sock_diag_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: sock_diag_rcv+0x17/0x40 net/core/sock_diag.c:275 #1: ffffffff8d0ec8c8 (sock_diag_table_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __sock_diag_cmd net/core/sock_diag.c:229 [inline] #1: ffffffff8d0ec8c8 (sock_diag_table_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: sock_diag_rcv_msg+0x19b/0x440 net/core/sock_diag.c:265 #2: ffff88807621e640 (nlk_cb_mutex-SOCK_DIAG){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: netlink_dump+0xb0/0xb70 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2233 #3: ffffffff8d27be18 (unix_table_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:363 [inline] #3: ffffffff8d27be18 (unix_table_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: unix_diag_dump+0x119/0x590 net/unix/diag.c:206 #4: ffff888039c4b9a0 (rlock-AF_UNIX){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:363 [inline] #4: ffff888039c4b9a0 (rlock-AF_UNIX){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: sk_diag_dump_icons net/unix/diag.c:68 [inline] #4: ffff888039c4b9a0 (rlock-AF_UNIX){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: sk_diag_fill+0x9bb/0x1100 net/unix/diag.c:154 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 4633 Comm: syz-executor.1 Not tainted 5.15.0-rc2-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0xcd/0x134 lib/dump_stack.c:106 check_noncircular+0x25f/0x2e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2131 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3051 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3174 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3789 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x2a07/0x54a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5015 lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5625 [inline] lock_acquire+0x1ab/0x510 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5590 _raw_spin_lock_nested+0x30/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:368 sk_diag_dump_icons net/unix/diag.c:86 [inline] sk_diag_fill+0xaa7/0x1100 net/unix/diag.c:154 sk_diag_dump net/unix/diag.c:192 [inline] unix_diag_dump+0x399/0x590 net/unix/diag.c:220 netlink_dump+0x4b9/0xb70 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2278 __netlink_dump_start+0x642/0x900 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2383 netlink_dump_start include/linux/netlink.h:258 [inline] unix_diag_handler_dump+0x411/0x7d0 net/unix/diag.c:319 __sock_diag_cmd net/core/sock_diag.c:234 [inline] sock_diag_rcv_msg+0x31a/0x440 net/core/sock_diag.c:265 netlink_rcv_skb+0x153/0x420 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2504 sock_diag_rcv+0x26/0x40 net/core/sock_diag.c:276 netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1314 [inline] netlink_unicast+0x533/0x7d0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1340 netlink_sendmsg+0x86d/0xdb0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1929 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:704 [inline] sock_sendmsg+0xcf/0x120 net/socket.c:724 sock_write_iter+0x289/0x3c0 net/socket.c:1057 call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2163 [inline] new_sync_write+0x429/0x660 fs/read_write.c:507 vfs_write+0x7cf/0xae0 fs/read_write.c:594 ksys_write+0x1ee/0x250 fs/read_write.c:647 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae RIP: 0033:0x7f8924e9d709 Code: ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 bc ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007f8922414188 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f8924fa1f60 RCX: 00007f8924e9d709 RDX: 0000000000000029 RSI: 000000002058bfe4 RDI: 0000000000000006 RBP: 00007f8924ef7cb4 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 00007fffebbf5eff R14: 00007f8922414300 R15: 0000000000022000