====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 4.17.0-rc1+ #17 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syzkaller626546/4526 is trying to acquire lock: 000000007758624d (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1469 [inline] 000000007758624d (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}, at: tcp_mmap+0x1c7/0x14f0 net/ipv4/tcp.c:1759 but task is already holding lock: 0000000070fb6fe4 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}, at: vm_mmap_pgoff+0x1a1/0x2a0 mm/util.c:355 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}: __might_fault+0x155/0x1e0 mm/memory.c:4555 _copy_from_iter_full+0x2fd/0xd10 lib/iov_iter.c:607 copy_from_iter_full include/linux/uio.h:124 [inline] skb_do_copy_data_nocache include/net/sock.h:1883 [inline] skb_add_data_nocache include/net/sock.h:1894 [inline] tcp_sendmsg_locked+0x2f98/0x3e10 net/ipv4/tcp.c:1316 tcp_sendmsg+0x2f/0x50 net/ipv4/tcp.c:1446 inet_sendmsg+0x19f/0x690 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:798 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:629 [inline] sock_sendmsg+0xd5/0x120 net/socket.c:639 sock_write_iter+0x35a/0x5a0 net/socket.c:908 call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:1784 [inline] new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:474 [inline] __vfs_write+0x64d/0x960 fs/read_write.c:487 vfs_write+0x1f8/0x560 fs/read_write.c:549 ksys_write+0xf9/0x250 fs/read_write.c:598 __do_sys_write fs/read_write.c:610 [inline] __se_sys_write fs/read_write.c:607 [inline] __x64_sys_write+0x73/0xb0 fs/read_write.c:607 do_syscall_64+0x1b1/0x800 arch/x86/entry/common.c:287 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe -> #0 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}: lock_acquire+0x1dc/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3920 lock_sock_nested+0xd0/0x120 net/core/sock.c:2844 lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1469 [inline] tcp_mmap+0x1c7/0x14f0 net/ipv4/tcp.c:1759 sock_mmap+0x8e/0xc0 net/socket.c:1144 call_mmap include/linux/fs.h:1789 [inline] mmap_region+0xd13/0x1820 mm/mmap.c:1723 do_mmap+0xc79/0x11d0 mm/mmap.c:1494 do_mmap_pgoff include/linux/mm.h:2237 [inline] vm_mmap_pgoff+0x1fb/0x2a0 mm/util.c:357 ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x4c9/0x640 mm/mmap.c:1544 __do_sys_mmap arch/x86/kernel/sys_x86_64.c:100 [inline] __se_sys_mmap arch/x86/kernel/sys_x86_64.c:91 [inline] __x64_sys_mmap+0xe9/0x1b0 arch/x86/kernel/sys_x86_64.c:91 do_syscall_64+0x1b1/0x800 arch/x86/entry/common.c:287 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&mm->mmap_sem); lock(sk_lock-AF_INET); lock(&mm->mmap_sem); lock(sk_lock-AF_INET); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by syzkaller626546/4526: #0: 0000000070fb6fe4 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}, at: vm_mmap_pgoff+0x1a1/0x2a0 mm/util.c:355 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 4526 Comm: syzkaller626546 Not tainted 4.17.0-rc1+ #17 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline] dump_stack+0x1b9/0x294 lib/dump_stack.c:113 print_circular_bug.isra.36.cold.54+0x1bd/0x27d kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1223 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1863 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1976 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2417 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x343e/0x5140 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3431 lock_acquire+0x1dc/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3920 lock_sock_nested+0xd0/0x120 net/core/sock.c:2844 lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1469 [inline] tcp_mmap+0x1c7/0x14f0 net/ipv4/tcp.c:1759 sock_mmap+0x8e/0xc0 net/socket.c:1144 call_mmap include/linux/fs.h:1789 [inline] mmap_region+0xd13/0x1820 mm/mmap.c:1723 do_mmap+0xc79/0x11d0 mm/mmap.c:1494 do_mmap_pgoff include/linux/mm.h:2237 [inline] vm_mmap_pgoff+0x1fb/0x2a0 mm/util.c:357 ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x4c9/0x640 mm/mmap.c:1544 __do_sys_mmap arch/x86/kernel/sys_x86_64.c:100 [inline] __se_sys_mmap arch/x86/kernel/sys_x86_64.c:91 [inline] __x64_sys_mmap+0xe9/0x1b0 arch/x86/kernel/sys_x86_64.c:91 do_syscall_64+0x1b1/0x800 arch/x86/entry/common.c:287 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe