====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.15.0-rc5-syzkaller-00204-g0e1329d4045c #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz.8.144/7295 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888074dfa0b0 (&tree->tree_lock/1){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: hfs_find_init+0x165/0x1e0 fs/hfs/bfind.c:-1 but task is already holding lock: ffff88805dd33b78 (&HFS_I(tree->inode)->extents_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: hfs_extend_file+0xda/0x1230 fs/hfs/extent.c:397 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&HFS_I(tree->inode)->extents_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}: lock_acquire+0x120/0x360 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5866 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:601 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x182/0xe80 kernel/locking/mutex.c:746 hfs_extend_file+0xda/0x1230 fs/hfs/extent.c:397 hfs_bmap_reserve+0x107/0x430 fs/hfs/btree.c:234 __hfs_ext_write_extent+0x1fa/0x470 fs/hfs/extent.c:121 __hfs_ext_cache_extent+0x6b/0x9b0 fs/hfs/extent.c:174 hfs_ext_read_extent fs/hfs/extent.c:202 [inline] hfs_extend_file+0x316/0x1230 fs/hfs/extent.c:401 hfs_get_block+0x3d7/0xbd0 fs/hfs/extent.c:353 __block_write_begin_int+0x6b2/0x1900 fs/buffer.c:2151 block_write_begin fs/buffer.c:2262 [inline] cont_write_begin+0x789/0xb50 fs/buffer.c:2601 hfs_write_begin+0x66/0xb0 fs/hfs/inode.c:52 generic_perform_write+0x2c4/0x910 mm/filemap.c:4103 generic_file_write_iter+0x10f/0x540 mm/filemap.c:4246 new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:591 [inline] vfs_write+0x548/0xa90 fs/read_write.c:684 ksys_write+0x145/0x250 fs/read_write.c:736 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf6/0x210 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f -> #0 (&tree->tree_lock/1){+.+.}-{4:4}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3166 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3285 [inline] validate_chain+0xb9b/0x2140 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3909 __lock_acquire+0xaac/0xd20 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5235 lock_acquire+0x120/0x360 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5866 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:601 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x182/0xe80 kernel/locking/mutex.c:746 hfs_find_init+0x165/0x1e0 fs/hfs/bfind.c:-1 hfs_ext_read_extent fs/hfs/extent.c:200 [inline] hfs_extend_file+0x2ee/0x1230 fs/hfs/extent.c:401 hfs_bmap_reserve+0x107/0x430 fs/hfs/btree.c:234 hfs_cat_create+0x1b3/0x640 fs/hfs/catalog.c:104 hfs_create+0x66/0xe0 fs/hfs/dir.c:202 lookup_open fs/namei.c:3701 [inline] open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3800 [inline] path_openat+0x14f1/0x3830 fs/namei.c:4036 do_filp_open+0x1fa/0x410 fs/namei.c:4066 do_sys_openat2+0x121/0x1c0 fs/open.c:1429 do_sys_open fs/open.c:1444 [inline] __do_sys_openat fs/open.c:1460 [inline] __se_sys_openat fs/open.c:1455 [inline] __x64_sys_openat+0x138/0x170 fs/open.c:1455 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf6/0x210 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&HFS_I(tree->inode)->extents_lock); lock(&tree->tree_lock/1); lock(&HFS_I(tree->inode)->extents_lock); lock(&tree->tree_lock/1); *** DEADLOCK *** 4 locks held by syz.8.144/7295: #0: ffff88807b1f2420 (sb_writers#18){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write+0x41/0x90 fs/namespace.c:556 #1: ffff88805dd36aa0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#11){++++}-{4:4}, at: inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:867 [inline] #1: ffff88805dd36aa0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#11){++++}-{4:4}, at: open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3797 [inline] #1: ffff88805dd36aa0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#11){++++}-{4:4}, at: path_openat+0x8da/0x3830 fs/namei.c:4036 #2: ffff888074ebc0b0 (&tree->tree_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: hfs_find_init+0x165/0x1e0 fs/hfs/bfind.c:-1 #3: ffff88805dd33b78 (&HFS_I(tree->inode)->extents_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: hfs_extend_file+0xda/0x1230 fs/hfs/extent.c:397 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 7295 Comm: syz.8.144 Not tainted 6.15.0-rc5-syzkaller-00204-g0e1329d4045c #0 PREEMPT(full) Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 05/07/2025 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x189/0x250 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_circular_bug+0x2ee/0x310 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2079 check_noncircular+0x134/0x160 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2211 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3166 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3285 [inline] validate_chain+0xb9b/0x2140 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3909 __lock_acquire+0xaac/0xd20 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5235 lock_acquire+0x120/0x360 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5866 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:601 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x182/0xe80 kernel/locking/mutex.c:746 hfs_find_init+0x165/0x1e0 fs/hfs/bfind.c:-1 hfs_ext_read_extent fs/hfs/extent.c:200 [inline] hfs_extend_file+0x2ee/0x1230 fs/hfs/extent.c:401 hfs_bmap_reserve+0x107/0x430 fs/hfs/btree.c:234 hfs_cat_create+0x1b3/0x640 fs/hfs/catalog.c:104 hfs_create+0x66/0xe0 fs/hfs/dir.c:202 lookup_open fs/namei.c:3701 [inline] open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3800 [inline] path_openat+0x14f1/0x3830 fs/namei.c:4036 do_filp_open+0x1fa/0x410 fs/namei.c:4066 do_sys_openat2+0x121/0x1c0 fs/open.c:1429 do_sys_open fs/open.c:1444 [inline] __do_sys_openat fs/open.c:1460 [inline] __se_sys_openat fs/open.c:1455 [inline] __x64_sys_openat+0x138/0x170 fs/open.c:1455 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf6/0x210 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7f767678e969 Code: ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 a8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007f7677595038 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000101 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f76769b5fa0 RCX: 00007f767678e969 RDX: 00000000001c7b43 RSI: 00002000000000c0 RDI: ffffffffffffff9c RBP: 00007f7676810ab1 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000109 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007f76769b5fa0 R15: 00007fff14cf1df8