====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 4.19.211-syzkaller #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz-executor.5/12150 is trying to acquire lock: 00000000a373a6df (sb_writers#20){.+.+}, at: sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1579 [inline] 00000000a373a6df (sb_writers#20){.+.+}, at: mnt_want_write_file+0x63/0x1d0 fs/namespace.c:418 but task is already holding lock: 00000000b30cb208 (&sbi->lock){+.+.}, at: reiserfs_write_lock+0x75/0xf0 fs/reiserfs/lock.c:27 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (&sbi->lock){+.+.}: reiserfs_write_lock+0x75/0xf0 fs/reiserfs/lock.c:27 reiserfs_lookup+0x171/0x490 fs/reiserfs/namei.c:363 __lookup_slow+0x246/0x4a0 fs/namei.c:1672 lookup_one_len+0x163/0x190 fs/namei.c:2544 reiserfs_lookup_privroot+0x92/0x280 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:970 reiserfs_fill_super+0x1f12/0x2d80 fs/reiserfs/super.c:2187 mount_bdev+0x2fc/0x3b0 fs/super.c:1158 mount_fs+0xa3/0x310 fs/super.c:1261 vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x68/0x470 fs/namespace.c:961 vfs_kern_mount fs/namespace.c:951 [inline] do_new_mount fs/namespace.c:2492 [inline] do_mount+0x115c/0x2f50 fs/namespace.c:2822 ksys_mount+0xcf/0x130 fs/namespace.c:3038 __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3052 [inline] __se_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3049 [inline] __x64_sys_mount+0xba/0x150 fs/namespace.c:3049 do_syscall_64+0xf9/0x620 arch/x86/entry/common.c:293 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe -> #1 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#9){+.+.}: inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:748 [inline] do_last fs/namei.c:3324 [inline] path_openat+0x1071/0x2df0 fs/namei.c:3537 do_filp_open+0x18c/0x3f0 fs/namei.c:3567 do_sys_open+0x3b3/0x520 fs/open.c:1085 do_syscall_64+0xf9/0x620 arch/x86/entry/common.c:293 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe -> #0 (sb_writers#20){.+.+}: percpu_down_read_preempt_disable include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:36 [inline] percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:59 [inline] __sb_start_write+0x6e/0x2a0 fs/super.c:1366 sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1579 [inline] mnt_want_write_file+0x63/0x1d0 fs/namespace.c:418 reiserfs_ioctl+0x1a7/0x9a0 fs/reiserfs/ioctl.c:110 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:46 [inline] file_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:501 [inline] do_vfs_ioctl+0xcdb/0x12e0 fs/ioctl.c:688 ksys_ioctl+0x9b/0xc0 fs/ioctl.c:705 __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:712 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:710 [inline] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x6f/0xb0 fs/ioctl.c:710 do_syscall_64+0xf9/0x620 arch/x86/entry/common.c:293 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: sb_writers#20 --> &type->i_mutex_dir_key#9 --> &sbi->lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&sbi->lock); lock(&type->i_mutex_dir_key#9); lock(&sbi->lock); lock(sb_writers#20); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by syz-executor.5/12150: #0: 00000000b30cb208 (&sbi->lock){+.+.}, at: reiserfs_write_lock+0x75/0xf0 fs/reiserfs/lock.c:27 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 12150 Comm: syz-executor.5 Not tainted 4.19.211-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/26/2022 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline] dump_stack+0x1fc/0x2ef lib/dump_stack.c:118 print_circular_bug.constprop.0.cold+0x2d7/0x41e kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1222 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1866 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1979 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2420 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x30c9/0x3ff0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3416 lock_acquire+0x170/0x3c0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3908 percpu_down_read_preempt_disable include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:36 [inline] percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:59 [inline] __sb_start_write+0x6e/0x2a0 fs/super.c:1366 sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1579 [inline] mnt_want_write_file+0x63/0x1d0 fs/namespace.c:418 reiserfs_ioctl+0x1a7/0x9a0 fs/reiserfs/ioctl.c:110 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:46 [inline] file_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:501 [inline] do_vfs_ioctl+0xcdb/0x12e0 fs/ioctl.c:688 ksys_ioctl+0x9b/0xc0 fs/ioctl.c:705 __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:712 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:710 [inline] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x6f/0xb0 fs/ioctl.c:710 do_syscall_64+0xf9/0x620 arch/x86/entry/common.c:293 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe RIP: 0033:0x7fa68d7b50d9 Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 f1 19 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007fa68bd27168 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fa68d8d4f80 RCX: 00007fa68d7b50d9 RDX: 00000000200000c0 RSI: 0000000040087602 RDI: 0000000000000004 RBP: 00007fa68d810ae9 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 00007ffc71db367f R14: 00007fa68bd27300 R15: 0000000000022000 audit: type=1800 audit(1669461065.507:61): pid=12216 uid=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 subj==unconfined op=collect_data cause=failed(directio) comm="syz-executor.5" name="file0" dev="loop5" ino=5 res=0 REISERFS (device loop5): found reiserfs format "3.6" with non-standard journal REISERFS (device loop5): using ordered data mode reiserfs: using flush barriers REISERFS (device loop5): journal params: device loop5, size 512, journal first block 18, max trans len 256, max batch 225, max commit age 30, max trans age 30 REISERFS (device loop5): checking transaction log (loop5) REISERFS (device loop5): Using r5 hash to sort names REISERFS (device loop5): Created .reiserfs_priv - reserved for xattr storage. audit: type=1800 audit(1669461066.127:62): pid=12283 uid=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 subj==unconfined op=collect_data cause=failed(directio) comm="syz-executor.5" name="file0" dev="loop5" ino=5 res=0 REISERFS (device loop5): found reiserfs format "3.6" with non-standard journal REISERFS (device loop5): using ordered data mode reiserfs: using flush barriers REISERFS (device loop5): journal params: device loop5, size 512, journal first block 18, max trans len 256, max batch 225, max commit age 30, max trans age 30 REISERFS (device loop5): checking transaction log (loop5) REISERFS (device loop5): Using r5 hash to sort names REISERFS (device loop5): Created .reiserfs_priv - reserved for xattr storage. audit: type=1800 audit(1669461066.777:63): pid=12336 uid=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 subj==unconfined op=collect_data cause=failed(directio) comm="syz-executor.5" name="file0" dev="loop5" ino=5 res=0 batman_adv: batadv0: Interface deactivated: batadv_slave_0 batman_adv: batadv0: Removing interface: batadv_slave_0 batman_adv: batadv0: Interface deactivated: batadv_slave_1 batman_adv: batadv0: Removing interface: batadv_slave_1 device bridge_slave_1 left promiscuous mode bridge0: port 2(bridge_slave_1) entered disabled state device bridge_slave_0 left promiscuous mode bridge0: port 1(bridge_slave_0) entered disabled state device veth1_macvtap left promiscuous mode device veth0_macvtap left promiscuous mode device veth1_vlan left promiscuous mode device veth0_vlan left promiscuous mode ieee802154 phy0 wpan0: encryption failed: -22 ieee802154 phy1 wpan1: encryption failed: -22 Bluetooth: hci0: command 0x0409 tx timeout device hsr_slave_1 left promiscuous mode device hsr_slave_0 left promiscuous mode team0 (unregistering): Port device team_slave_1 removed team0 (unregistering): Port device team_slave_0 removed bond0 (unregistering): Releasing backup interface bond_slave_1 bond0 (unregistering): Releasing backup interface bond_slave_0 bond0 (unregistering): Released all slaves IPVS: ftp: loaded support on port[0] = 21 IPVS: ftp: loaded support on port[0] = 21 chnl_net:caif_netlink_parms(): no params data found chnl_net:caif_netlink_parms(): no params data found bridge0: port 1(bridge_slave_0) entered blocking state bridge0: port 1(bridge_slave_0) entered disabled state device bridge_slave_0 entered promiscuous mode bridge0: port 2(bridge_slave_1) entered blocking state bridge0: port 2(bridge_slave_1) entered disabled state device bridge_slave_1 entered promiscuous mode Bluetooth: hci1: command 0x0409 tx timeout bond0: Enslaving bond_slave_0 as an active interface with an up link bond0: Enslaving bond_slave_1 as an active interface with an up link bridge0: port 1(bridge_slave_0) entered blocking state bridge0: port 1(bridge_slave_0) entered disabled state device bridge_slave_0 entered promiscuous mode bridge0: port 2(bridge_slave_1) entered blocking state bridge0: port 2(bridge_slave_1) entered disabled state device bridge_slave_1 entered promiscuous mode IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): team_slave_0: link is not ready team0: Port device team_slave_0 added IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): team_slave_1: link is not ready team0: Port device team_slave_1 added bond0: Enslaving bond_slave_0 as an active interface with an up link bond0: Enslaving bond_slave_1 as an active interface with an up link IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): team_slave_0: link is not ready team0: Port device team_slave_0 added batman_adv: batadv0: Adding interface: batadv_slave_0 batman_adv: batadv0: The MTU of interface batadv_slave_0 is too small (1500) to handle the transport of batman-adv packets. Packets going over this interface will be fragmented on layer2 which could impact the performance. Setting the MTU to 1560 would solve the problem. batman_adv: batadv0: Not using interface batadv_slave_0 (retrying later): interface not active IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): team_slave_1: link is not ready team0: Port device team_slave_1 added batman_adv: batadv0: Adding interface: batadv_slave_1 batman_adv: batadv0: The MTU of interface batadv_slave_1 is too small (1500) to handle the transport of batman-adv packets. Packets going over this interface will be fragmented on layer2 which could impact the performance. Setting the MTU to 1560 would solve the problem. batman_adv: batadv0: Not using interface batadv_slave_1 (retrying later): interface not active IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): bridge_slave_0: link is not ready batman_adv: batadv0: Adding interface: batadv_slave_0 batman_adv: batadv0: The MTU of interface batadv_slave_0 is too small (1500) to handle the transport of batman-adv packets. Packets going over this interface will be fragmented on layer2 which could impact the performance. Setting the MTU to 1560 would solve the problem. batman_adv: batadv0: Not using interface batadv_slave_0 (retrying later): interface not active IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): bridge_slave_1: link is not ready batman_adv: batadv0: Adding interface: batadv_slave_1 batman_adv: batadv0: The MTU of interface batadv_slave_1 is too small (1500) to handle the transport of batman-adv packets. Packets going over this interface will be fragmented on layer2 which could impact the performance. Setting the MTU to 1560 would solve the problem. batman_adv: batadv0: Not using interface batadv_slave_1 (retrying later): interface not active IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): bridge_slave_0: link is not ready IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): bridge_slave_1: link is not ready device hsr_slave_0 entered promiscuous mode device hsr_slave_1 entered promiscuous mode IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): hsr_slave_0: link is not ready device hsr_slave_0 entered promiscuous mode device hsr_slave_1 entered promiscuous mode IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): hsr_slave_1: link is not ready IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): hsr_slave_0: link is not ready IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): hsr_slave_1: link is not ready Bluetooth: hci0: command 0x041b tx timeout IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): bridge0: link is not ready IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): bridge0: link is not ready 8021q: adding VLAN 0 to HW filter on device bond0 IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): veth0: link is not ready IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): veth1: link is not ready IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): veth1: link becomes ready IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): veth0: link becomes ready IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): team0: link is not ready 8021q: adding VLAN 0 to HW filter on device team0 IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): veth0_to_bridge: link is not ready IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): veth0_to_bridge: link becomes ready IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): bridge_slave_0: link becomes ready bridge0: port 1(bridge_slave_0) entered blocking state bridge0: port 1(bridge_slave_0) entered forwarding state IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): bridge0: link becomes ready IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): veth1_to_bridge: link is not ready IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): veth1_to_bridge: link becomes ready IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): bridge_slave_1: link becomes ready bridge0: port 2(bridge_slave_1) entered blocking state bridge0: port 2(bridge_slave_1) entered forwarding state IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): veth0_to_bond: link is not ready IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): veth0_to_bond: link becomes ready IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): veth1_to_bond: link is not ready 8021q: adding VLAN 0 to HW filter on device bond0 IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): veth1_to_bond: link becomes ready IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): veth0_to_team: link is not ready IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): veth0: link is not ready IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): veth0_to_team: link becomes ready IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): team_slave_0: link becomes ready IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): team0: link becomes ready IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): veth1_to_team: link is not ready IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): veth1_to_team: link becomes ready IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): team_slave_1: link becomes ready IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): veth1: link is not ready IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): veth0_to_hsr: link is not ready