====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 4.14.296-syzkaller #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz-executor.5/15508 is trying to acquire lock: caif:caif_disconnect_client(): nothing to disconnect (&xt[i].mutex){+.+.}, at: [] target_revfn+0x43/0x210 net/netfilter/x_tables.c:354 but task is already holding lock: (&table[i].mutex){+.+.}, at: [] nfnl_lock net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c:61 [inline] (&table[i].mutex){+.+.}, at: [] nfnetlink_rcv_msg+0x726/0xc00 net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c:209 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (&table[i].mutex){+.+.}: __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:756 [inline] __mutex_lock+0xc4/0x1310 kernel/locking/mutex.c:893 nf_tables_netdev_event+0x10d/0x4d0 net/netfilter/nf_tables_netdev.c:122 notifier_call_chain+0x108/0x1a0 kernel/notifier.c:93 call_netdevice_notifiers_info net/core/dev.c:1667 [inline] call_netdevice_notifiers net/core/dev.c:1683 [inline] dev_change_name+0x3ef/0x6a0 net/core/dev.c:1232 dev_ifsioc+0x2c2/0x7d0 net/core/dev_ioctl.c:323 dev_ioctl+0x63f/0xbe0 net/core/dev_ioctl.c:515 sock_do_ioctl net/socket.c:981 [inline] sock_ioctl+0x164/0x4c0 net/socket.c:1071 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:46 [inline] file_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:500 [inline] do_vfs_ioctl+0x75a/0xff0 fs/ioctl.c:684 SYSC_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:701 [inline] SyS_ioctl+0x7f/0xb0 fs/ioctl.c:692 do_syscall_64+0x1d5/0x640 arch/x86/entry/common.c:292 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xbb -> #1 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}: __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:756 [inline] __mutex_lock+0xc4/0x1310 kernel/locking/mutex.c:893 unregister_netdevice_notifier+0x5e/0x2b0 net/core/dev.c:1630 audit: type=1800 audit(1666804716.216:143): pid=15489 uid=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 op="collect_data" cause="failed(directio)" comm="syz-executor.5" name="file0" dev="sda1" ino=14742 res=0 tee_tg_destroy+0x5c/0xb0 net/netfilter/xt_TEE.c:123 cleanup_entry+0x232/0x310 net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c:685 __do_replace+0x38d/0x580 net/ipv4/netfilter/arp_tables.c:930 do_replace net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c:1162 [inline] do_ip6t_set_ctl+0x256/0x3b0 net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c:1688 nf_sockopt net/netfilter/nf_sockopt.c:106 [inline] nf_setsockopt+0x5f/0xb0 net/netfilter/nf_sockopt.c:115 ipv6_setsockopt+0xc0/0x120 net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c:937 tcp_setsockopt+0x7b/0xc0 net/ipv4/tcp.c:2831 SYSC_setsockopt net/socket.c:1865 [inline] SyS_setsockopt+0x110/0x1e0 net/socket.c:1844 do_syscall_64+0x1d5/0x640 arch/x86/entry/common.c:292 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xbb audit: type=1804 audit(1666804716.336:144): pid=15514 uid=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 op="invalid_pcr" cause="open_writers" comm="syz-executor.0" name="/root/syzkaller-testdir1107618548/syzkaller.enxQje/218/bus" dev="sda1" ino=13954 res=1 -> #0 (&xt[i].mutex){+.+.}: lock_acquire+0x170/0x3f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3998 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:756 [inline] __mutex_lock+0xc4/0x1310 kernel/locking/mutex.c:893 target_revfn+0x43/0x210 net/netfilter/x_tables.c:354 xt_find_revision+0x15e/0x1d0 net/netfilter/x_tables.c:378 nfnl_compat_get+0x1f7/0x870 net/netfilter/nft_compat.c:678 nfnetlink_rcv_msg+0x9bb/0xc00 net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c:214 netlink_rcv_skb+0x125/0x390 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2454 nfnetlink_rcv+0x1ab/0x1da0 net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c:515 netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1296 [inline] netlink_unicast+0x437/0x610 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1322 audit: type=1800 audit(1666804716.336:145): pid=15514 uid=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 op="collect_data" cause="failed(directio)" comm="syz-executor.0" name="bus" dev="sda1" ino=13954 res=0 netlink_sendmsg+0x648/0xbc0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1893 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:646 [inline] sock_sendmsg+0xb5/0x100 net/socket.c:656 ___sys_sendmsg+0x6c8/0x800 net/socket.c:2062 __sys_sendmsg+0xa3/0x120 net/socket.c:2096 SYSC_sendmsg net/socket.c:2107 [inline] SyS_sendmsg+0x27/0x40 net/socket.c:2103 do_syscall_64+0x1d5/0x640 arch/x86/entry/common.c:292 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xbb other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &xt[i].mutex --> rtnl_mutex --> &table[i].mutex Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&table[i].mutex); lock(rtnl_mutex); lock(&table[i].mutex); lock(&xt[i].mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by syz-executor.5/15508: #0: (&table[i].mutex){+.+.}, at: [] nfnl_lock net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c:61 [inline] #0: (&table[i].mutex){+.+.}, at: [] nfnetlink_rcv_msg+0x726/0xc00 net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c:209 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 15508 Comm: syz-executor.5 Not tainted 4.14.296-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/11/2022 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:17 [inline] dump_stack+0x1b2/0x281 lib/dump_stack.c:58 print_circular_bug.constprop.0.cold+0x2d7/0x41e kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1258 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1905 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2022 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2464 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x2e0e/0x3f20 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3491 lock_acquire+0x170/0x3f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3998 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:756 [inline] __mutex_lock+0xc4/0x1310 kernel/locking/mutex.c:893 target_revfn+0x43/0x210 net/netfilter/x_tables.c:354 xt_find_revision+0x15e/0x1d0 net/netfilter/x_tables.c:378 nfnl_compat_get+0x1f7/0x870 net/netfilter/nft_compat.c:678 nfnetlink_rcv_msg+0x9bb/0xc00 net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c:214 netlink_rcv_skb+0x125/0x390 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2454 nfnetlink_rcv+0x1ab/0x1da0 net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c:515 netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1296 [inline] netlink_unicast+0x437/0x610 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1322 netlink_sendmsg+0x648/0xbc0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1893 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:646 [inline] sock_sendmsg+0xb5/0x100 net/socket.c:656 ___sys_sendmsg+0x6c8/0x800 net/socket.c:2062 __sys_sendmsg+0xa3/0x120 net/socket.c:2096 SYSC_sendmsg net/socket.c:2107 [inline] SyS_sendmsg+0x27/0x40 net/socket.c:2103 do_syscall_64+0x1d5/0x640 arch/x86/entry/common.c:292 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xbb RIP: 0033:0x7f392aa125a9 RSP: 002b:00007f3928f85168 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002e RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f392ab32f80 RCX: 00007f392aa125a9 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000020000140 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00007f392aa6d7b0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 00007fffc6a3eebf R14: 00007f3928f85300 R15: 0000000000022000 caif:caif_disconnect_client(): nothing to disconnect caif:caif_disconnect_client(): nothing to disconnect overlayfs: fs on './file0' does not support file handles, falling back to index=off. audit: type=1800 audit(1666804718.137:146): pid=15573 uid=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 op="collect_data" cause="failed(directio)" comm="syz-executor.3" name="file0" dev="sda1" ino=14228 res=0 caif:caif_disconnect_client(): nothing to disconnect overlayfs: fs on './file0' does not support file handles, falling back to index=off. kauditd_printk_skb: 9 callbacks suppressed audit: type=1800 audit(1666804718.467:156): pid=15638 uid=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 op="collect_data" cause="failed(directio)" comm="syz-executor.3" name="file0" dev="sda1" ino=13987 res=0 overlayfs: fs on './file0' does not support file handles, falling back to index=off. audit: type=1804 audit(1666804718.567:157): pid=15654 uid=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 op="invalid_pcr" cause="open_writers" comm="syz-executor.5" name="/root/syzkaller-testdir727859482/syzkaller.6jBArh/248/file0" dev="sda1" ino=13972 res=1 audit: type=1804 audit(1666804718.567:158): pid=15654 uid=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 op="invalid_pcr" cause="ToMToU" comm="syz-executor.5" name="/root/syzkaller-testdir727859482/syzkaller.6jBArh/248/file0" dev="sda1" ino=13972 res=1 audit: type=1804 audit(1666804718.617:159): pid=15657 uid=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 op="invalid_pcr" cause="open_writers" comm="syz-executor.3" name="/root/syzkaller-testdir3976083375/syzkaller.DBx5ov/195/file0" dev="sda1" ino=13894 res=1 overlayfs: fs on './file0' does not support file handles, falling back to index=off. audit: type=1804 audit(1666804718.617:160): pid=15657 uid=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 op="invalid_pcr" cause="ToMToU" comm="syz-executor.3" name="/root/syzkaller-testdir3976083375/syzkaller.DBx5ov/195/file0" dev="sda1" ino=13894 res=1 audit: type=1804 audit(1666804718.627:161): pid=15658 uid=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 op="invalid_pcr" cause="open_writers" comm="syz-executor.1" name="/root/syzkaller-testdir3297455605/syzkaller.RmNY7p/238/file0" dev="sda1" ino=13906 res=1 audit: type=1804 audit(1666804718.627:162): pid=15658 uid=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 op="invalid_pcr" cause="ToMToU" comm="syz-executor.1" name="/root/syzkaller-testdir3297455605/syzkaller.RmNY7p/238/file0" dev="sda1" ino=13906 res=1 audit: type=1804 audit(1666804718.657:163): pid=15660 uid=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 op="invalid_pcr" cause="open_writers" comm="syz-executor.5" name="/root/syzkaller-testdir727859482/syzkaller.6jBArh/248/file0" dev="sda1" ino=13972 res=1 audit: type=1804 audit(1666804718.657:164): pid=15660 uid=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 op="invalid_pcr" cause="ToMToU" comm="syz-executor.5" name="/root/syzkaller-testdir727859482/syzkaller.6jBArh/248/file0" dev="sda1" ino=13972 res=1 audit: type=1804 audit(1666804718.687:165): pid=15664 uid=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 op="invalid_pcr" cause="open_writers" comm="syz-executor.1" name="/root/syzkaller-testdir3297455605/syzkaller.RmNY7p/238/file0" dev="sda1" ino=13906 res=1 xt_ecn: cannot match TCP bits in rule for non-tcp packets xt_ecn: cannot match TCP bits in rule for non-tcp packets xt_ecn: cannot match TCP bits in rule for non-tcp packets xt_ecn: cannot match TCP bits in rule for non-tcp packets xt_ecn: cannot match TCP bits in rule for non-tcp packets xt_ecn: cannot match TCP bits in rule for non-tcp packets xt_ecn: cannot match TCP bits in rule for non-tcp packets xt_ecn: cannot match TCP bits in rule for non-tcp packets xt_ecn: cannot match TCP bits in rule for non-tcp packets xt_ecn: cannot match TCP bits in rule for non-tcp packets