====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.9.0-rc5-syzkaller-00007-g4d2008430ce8 #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz-executor.3/9587 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8880626ab8f8 (&sbi->alloc_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hfsplus_block_free+0xbb/0x4e0 fs/hfsplus/bitmap.c:182 but task is already holding lock: ffff88807ed10108 (&HFSPLUS_I(inode)->extents_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hfsplus_file_truncate+0x2da/0xb50 fs/hfsplus/extents.c:576 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&HFSPLUS_I(inode)->extents_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x136/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752 hfsplus_get_block+0x383/0x14f0 fs/hfsplus/extents.c:260 block_read_full_folio+0x430/0xe10 fs/buffer.c:2384 filemap_read_folio+0x1a2/0x790 mm/filemap.c:2331 do_read_cache_folio+0x134/0x820 mm/filemap.c:3747 do_read_cache_page+0x30/0x200 mm/filemap.c:3813 read_mapping_page include/linux/pagemap.h:888 [inline] hfsplus_block_allocate+0xee/0x8c0 fs/hfsplus/bitmap.c:37 hfsplus_file_extend+0xade/0x1b70 fs/hfsplus/extents.c:468 hfsplus_get_block+0x406/0x14f0 fs/hfsplus/extents.c:245 __block_write_begin_int+0x50e/0x1a70 fs/buffer.c:2105 __block_write_begin fs/buffer.c:2154 [inline] block_write_begin+0x9b/0x1e0 fs/buffer.c:2213 cont_write_begin+0x645/0x890 fs/buffer.c:2567 hfsplus_write_begin+0x8a/0xd0 fs/hfsplus/inode.c:47 generic_perform_write+0x324/0x640 mm/filemap.c:3974 generic_file_write_iter+0xaf/0x310 mm/filemap.c:4095 call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2110 [inline] new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:497 [inline] vfs_write+0xa86/0xcb0 fs/read_write.c:590 ksys_write+0x1a0/0x2c0 fs/read_write.c:643 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f -> #0 (&sbi->alloc_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline] validate_chain+0x18cb/0x58e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869 __lock_acquire+0x1346/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137 lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x136/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752 hfsplus_block_free+0xbb/0x4e0 fs/hfsplus/bitmap.c:182 hfsplus_free_extents+0x17a/0xae0 fs/hfsplus/extents.c:363 hfsplus_file_truncate+0x7d0/0xb50 fs/hfsplus/extents.c:591 hfsplus_delete_inode+0x174/0x220 hfsplus_unlink+0x512/0x790 fs/hfsplus/dir.c:405 vfs_unlink+0x367/0x600 fs/namei.c:4335 do_unlinkat+0x4ae/0x830 fs/namei.c:4399 __do_sys_unlink fs/namei.c:4447 [inline] __se_sys_unlink fs/namei.c:4445 [inline] __x64_sys_unlink+0x49/0x60 fs/namei.c:4445 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&HFSPLUS_I(inode)->extents_lock); lock(&sbi->alloc_mutex); lock(&HFSPLUS_I(inode)->extents_lock); lock(&sbi->alloc_mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 5 locks held by syz-executor.3/9587: #0: ffff8880235d2420 (sb_writers#18){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write+0x3f/0x90 fs/namespace.c:409 #1: ffff88807ed14d40 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#11/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock_nested include/linux/fs.h:830 [inline] #1: ffff88807ed14d40 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#11/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: do_unlinkat+0x26a/0x830 fs/namei.c:4386 #2: ffff88807ed10300 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#26){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:795 [inline] #2: ffff88807ed10300 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#26){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: vfs_unlink+0xe4/0x600 fs/namei.c:4324 #3: ffff8880626ab998 (&sbi->vh_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hfsplus_unlink+0x161/0x790 fs/hfsplus/dir.c:370 #4: ffff88807ed10108 (&HFSPLUS_I(inode)->extents_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hfsplus_file_truncate+0x2da/0xb50 fs/hfsplus/extents.c:576 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 9587 Comm: syz-executor.3 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc5-syzkaller-00007-g4d2008430ce8 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:114 check_noncircular+0x36a/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2187 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline] validate_chain+0x18cb/0x58e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869 __lock_acquire+0x1346/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137 lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x136/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752 hfsplus_block_free+0xbb/0x4e0 fs/hfsplus/bitmap.c:182 hfsplus_free_extents+0x17a/0xae0 fs/hfsplus/extents.c:363 hfsplus_file_truncate+0x7d0/0xb50 fs/hfsplus/extents.c:591 hfsplus_delete_inode+0x174/0x220 hfsplus_unlink+0x512/0x790 fs/hfsplus/dir.c:405 vfs_unlink+0x367/0x600 fs/namei.c:4335 do_unlinkat+0x4ae/0x830 fs/namei.c:4399 __do_sys_unlink fs/namei.c:4447 [inline] __se_sys_unlink fs/namei.c:4445 [inline] __x64_sys_unlink+0x49/0x60 fs/namei.c:4445 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7fb45987d657 Code: 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 83 c8 ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 b8 57 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007fff27ecd3d8 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000057 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007fb45987d657 RDX: 00007fff27ecd400 RSI: 00007fff27ecd490 RDI: 00007fff27ecd490 RBP: 00007fff27ecd490 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000100 R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 00007fff27ece580 R13: 00007fb4598c93b9 R14: 00000000000672d5 R15: 000000000000000d