======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.9.0-rc7-syzkaller-00188-gba16c1cf11c9 #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor890/5069 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff8880239007c8 (&HFSPLUS_I(inode)->extents_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hfsplus_file_extend+0x21b/0x1b70 fs/hfsplus/extents.c:457

but task is already holding lock:
ffff8880243640b0 (&tree->tree_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hfsplus_find_init+0x14a/0x1c0

which lock already depends on the new lock.


the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #1 (&tree->tree_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
       __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline]
       __mutex_lock+0x136/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
       hfsplus_file_truncate+0x811/0xb50 fs/hfsplus/extents.c:595
       hfsplus_setattr+0x1ce/0x280 fs/hfsplus/inode.c:265
       notify_change+0xb9d/0xe70 fs/attr.c:497
       do_truncate fs/open.c:65 [inline]
       do_ftruncate+0x46b/0x590 fs/open.c:181
       do_sys_ftruncate fs/open.c:199 [inline]
       __do_sys_ftruncate fs/open.c:207 [inline]
       __se_sys_ftruncate fs/open.c:205 [inline]
       __x64_sys_ftruncate+0x95/0xf0 fs/open.c:205
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

-> #0 (&HFSPLUS_I(inode)->extents_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline]
       check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline]
       validate_chain+0x18cb/0x58e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869
       __lock_acquire+0x1346/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
       lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
       __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline]
       __mutex_lock+0x136/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
       hfsplus_file_extend+0x21b/0x1b70 fs/hfsplus/extents.c:457
       hfsplus_bmap_reserve+0x105/0x4e0 fs/hfsplus/btree.c:358
       hfsplus_rename_cat+0x1d0/0x1050 fs/hfsplus/catalog.c:456
       hfsplus_rename+0x12e/0x1c0 fs/hfsplus/dir.c:552
       vfs_rename+0xbdb/0xf00 fs/namei.c:4880
       do_renameat2+0xd94/0x13f0 fs/namei.c:5037
       __do_sys_rename fs/namei.c:5084 [inline]
       __se_sys_rename fs/namei.c:5082 [inline]
       __x64_sys_rename+0x86/0xa0 fs/namei.c:5082
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

other info that might help us debug this:

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(&tree->tree_lock);
                               lock(&HFSPLUS_I(inode)->extents_lock);
                               lock(&tree->tree_lock);
  lock(&HFSPLUS_I(inode)->extents_lock);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

5 locks held by syz-executor890/5069:
 #0: ffff888024348420 (sb_writers#9){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write+0x3f/0x90 fs/namespace.c:409
 #1: ffff888023901e00 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock_nested include/linux/fs.h:830 [inline]
 #1: ffff888023901e00 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_rename fs/namei.c:3066 [inline]
 #1: ffff888023901e00 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: do_renameat2+0x62c/0x13f0 fs/namei.c:4972
 #2: ffff888024500300 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#14){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:795 [inline]
 #2: ffff888024500300 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#14){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_two_nondirectories+0xe1/0x170 fs/inode.c:1111
 #3: ffff888024501080 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#14/4){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: vfs_rename+0x6a2/0xf00 fs/namei.c:4851
 #4: ffff8880243640b0 (&tree->tree_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hfsplus_find_init+0x14a/0x1c0

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 5069 Comm: syz-executor890 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc7-syzkaller-00188-gba16c1cf11c9 #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 04/02/2024
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
 dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:114
 check_noncircular+0x36a/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2187
 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline]
 check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline]
 validate_chain+0x18cb/0x58e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869
 __lock_acquire+0x1346/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
 lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline]
 __mutex_lock+0x136/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
 hfsplus_file_extend+0x21b/0x1b70 fs/hfsplus/extents.c:457
 hfsplus_bmap_reserve+0x105/0x4e0 fs/hfsplus/btree.c:358
 hfsplus_rename_cat+0x1d0/0x1050 fs/hfsplus/catalog.c:456
 hfsplus_rename+0x12e/0x1c0 fs/hfsplus/dir.c:552
 vfs_rename+0xbdb/0xf00 fs/namei.c:4880
 do_renameat2+0xd94/0x13f0 fs/namei.c:5037
 __do_sys_rename fs/namei.c:5084 [inline]
 __se_sys_rename fs/namei.c:5082 [inline]
 __x64_sys_rename+0x86/0xa0 fs/namei.c:5082
 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
 do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7fa93f86e739
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 61 17 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007ffd701afa98 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000052
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0031656c69662f2e RCX: 00007fa93f86e739
RDX: 0000000000000073 RSI: 0000000020000300 RDI: 0000000020000b00
RBP: 00007fa93f8e1610 R08: 00007ffd701afc68 R09: 00007ffd701afc68
R10: 00007ffd701afc68 R11: 0000000000000246 R