Warning: Permanently added '10.128.1.130' (ED25519) to the list of known hosts. 1970/01/01 00:01:01 ignoring optional flag "sandboxArg"="0" 1970/01/01 00:01:01 parsed 1 programs [ 61.653323][ T6518] Adding 124996k swap on ./swap-file. Priority:0 extents:1 across:124996k SS 1970/01/01 00:01:01 executed programs: 0 [ 61.688017][ T5742] Bluetooth: hci0: unexpected cc 0x0c03 length: 249 > 1 [ 61.690230][ T5742] Bluetooth: hci0: unexpected cc 0x1003 length: 249 > 9 [ 61.692368][ T5742] Bluetooth: hci0: unexpected cc 0x1001 length: 249 > 9 [ 61.694480][ T5742] Bluetooth: hci0: unexpected cc 0x0c23 length: 249 > 4 [ 61.696892][ T5742] Bluetooth: hci0: unexpected cc 0x0c25 length: 249 > 3 [ 61.698712][ T5742] Bluetooth: hci0: unexpected cc 0x0c38 length: 249 > 2 [ 61.760997][ T6525] chnl_net:caif_netlink_parms(): no params data found [ 61.786224][ T6525] bridge0: port 1(bridge_slave_0) entered blocking state [ 61.787951][ T6525] bridge0: port 1(bridge_slave_0) entered disabled state [ 61.789576][ T6525] bridge_slave_0: entered allmulticast mode [ 61.791361][ T6525] bridge_slave_0: entered promiscuous mode [ 61.795327][ T6525] bridge0: port 2(bridge_slave_1) entered blocking state [ 61.797441][ T6525] bridge0: port 2(bridge_slave_1) entered disabled state [ 61.799026][ T6525] bridge_slave_1: entered allmulticast mode [ 61.800814][ T6525] bridge_slave_1: entered promiscuous mode [ 61.811307][ T6525] bond0: (slave bond_slave_0): Enslaving as an active interface with an up link [ 61.814721][ T6525] bond0: (slave bond_slave_1): Enslaving as an active interface with an up link [ 61.826859][ T6525] team0: Port device team_slave_0 added [ 61.829315][ T6525] team0: Port device team_slave_1 added [ 61.838472][ T6525] batman_adv: batadv0: Adding interface: batadv_slave_0 [ 61.840062][ T6525] batman_adv: batadv0: The MTU of interface batadv_slave_0 is too small (1500) to handle the transport of batman-adv packets. Packets going over this interface will be fragmented on layer2 which could impact the performance. Setting the MTU to 1560 would solve the problem. [ 61.845904][ T6525] batman_adv: batadv0: Not using interface batadv_slave_0 (retrying later): interface not active [ 61.849671][ T6525] batman_adv: batadv0: Adding interface: batadv_slave_1 [ 61.851196][ T6525] batman_adv: batadv0: The MTU of interface batadv_slave_1 is too small (1500) to handle the transport of batman-adv packets. Packets going over this interface will be fragmented on layer2 which could impact the performance. Setting the MTU to 1560 would solve the problem. [ 61.857540][ T6525] batman_adv: batadv0: Not using interface batadv_slave_1 (retrying later): interface not active [ 61.907745][ T6525] hsr_slave_0: entered promiscuous mode [ 61.956753][ T6525] hsr_slave_1: entered promiscuous mode [ 62.644121][ T6525] netdevsim netdevsim0 netdevsim0: renamed from eth0 [ 62.697810][ T6525] netdevsim netdevsim0 netdevsim1: renamed from eth1 [ 62.749134][ T6525] netdevsim netdevsim0 netdevsim2: renamed from eth2 [ 62.797803][ T6525] netdevsim netdevsim0 netdevsim3: renamed from eth3 [ 62.880892][ T6525] 8021q: adding VLAN 0 to HW filter on device bond0 [ 62.889346][ T6525] 8021q: adding VLAN 0 to HW filter on device team0 [ 62.893353][ T8] bridge0: port 1(bridge_slave_0) entered blocking state [ 62.894991][ T8] bridge0: port 1(bridge_slave_0) entered forwarding state [ 62.900906][ T6169] bridge0: port 2(bridge_slave_1) entered blocking state [ 62.902402][ T6169] bridge0: port 2(bridge_slave_1) entered forwarding state [ 62.921964][ T6525] hsr0: Slave B (hsr_slave_1) is not up; please bring it up to get a fully working HSR network [ 62.992650][ T6525] 8021q: adding VLAN 0 to HW filter on device batadv0 [ 63.012712][ T6525] veth0_vlan: entered promiscuous mode [ 63.018994][ T6525] veth1_vlan: entered promiscuous mode [ 63.033901][ T6525] veth0_macvtap: entered promiscuous mode [ 63.039291][ T6525] veth1_macvtap: entered promiscuous mode [ 63.048016][ T6525] batman_adv: batadv0: Interface activated: batadv_slave_0 [ 63.052885][ T6525] batman_adv: batadv0: Interface activated: batadv_slave_1 [ 63.059305][ T6525] netdevsim netdevsim0 netdevsim0: set [1, 0] type 2 family 0 port 6081 - 0 [ 63.061239][ T6525] netdevsim netdevsim0 netdevsim1: set [1, 0] type 2 family 0 port 6081 - 0 [ 63.063150][ T6525] netdevsim netdevsim0 netdevsim2: set [1, 0] type 2 family 0 port 6081 - 0 [ 63.064936][ T6525] netdevsim netdevsim0 netdevsim3: set [1, 0] type 2 family 0 port 6081 - 0 [ 63.110074][ T41] wlan0: Created IBSS using preconfigured BSSID 50:50:50:50:50:50 [ 63.111800][ T41] wlan0: Creating new IBSS network, BSSID 50:50:50:50:50:50 [ 63.129449][ T41] wlan1: Created IBSS using preconfigured BSSID 50:50:50:50:50:50 [ 63.131226][ T41] wlan1: Creating new IBSS network, BSSID 50:50:50:50:50:50 [ 63.235956][ T6629] [ 63.236462][ T6629] ====================================================== [ 63.238121][ T6629] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 63.239660][ T6629] 6.8.0-rc7-syzkaller-00135-g707081b61156 #0 Not tainted [ 63.241251][ T6629] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 63.242855][ T6629] syz-executor.0/6629 is trying to acquire lock: [ 63.244284][ T6629] ffff0000c8444af8 ((work_completion)(&new_smc->smc_listen_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0xd0/0x1c0 [ 63.246886][ T6629] [ 63.246886][ T6629] but task is already holding lock: [ 63.248558][ T6629] ffff0000c8442d30 (sk_lock-AF_SMC/1){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: smc_release+0x1e8/0x528 [ 63.250540][ T6629] [ 63.250540][ T6629] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 63.250540][ T6629] [ 63.252857][ T6629] [ 63.252857][ T6629] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 63.254895][ T6629] [ 63.254895][ T6629] -> #1 (sk_lock-AF_SMC/1){+.+.}-{0:0}: [ 63.256702][ T6629] lock_sock_nested+0x5c/0x11c [ 63.257938][ T6629] smc_listen_out+0x10c/0x3bc [ 63.259162][ T6629] smc_listen_work+0x4c8/0xfcc [ 63.260266][ T6629] process_one_work+0x694/0x1204 [ 63.261446][ T6629] worker_thread+0x938/0xef4 [ 63.262592][ T6629] kthread+0x288/0x310 [ 63.263607][ T6629] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 [ 63.264735][ T6629] [ 63.264735][ T6629] -> #0 ((work_completion)(&new_smc->smc_listen_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: [ 63.267095][ T6629] __lock_acquire+0x3384/0x763c [ 63.268366][ T6629] lock_acquire+0x23c/0x71c [ 63.269472][ T6629] __flush_work+0xf8/0x1c0 [ 63.270541][ T6629] __cancel_work_timer+0x3e4/0x540 [ 63.271918][ T6629] cancel_work_sync+0x24/0x38 [ 63.273150][ T6629] smc_clcsock_release+0x64/0xec [ 63.274415][ T6629] __smc_release+0x55c/0x700 [ 63.275530][ T6629] smc_close_non_accepted+0xd8/0x260 [ 63.276903][ T6629] smc_close_active+0x9bc/0xd20 [ 63.278175][ T6629] __smc_release+0xa0/0x700 [ 63.279382][ T6629] smc_release+0x260/0x528 [ 63.280525][ T6629] sock_close+0xa4/0x1e8 [ 63.281555][ T6629] __fput+0x30c/0x738 [ 63.282575][ T6629] __fput_sync+0x60/0x9c [ 63.283582][ T6629] __arm64_sys_close+0x150/0x1e0 [ 63.284804][ T6629] invoke_syscall+0x98/0x2b8 [ 63.285940][ T6629] el0_svc_common+0x130/0x23c [ 63.287244][ T6629] do_el0_svc+0x48/0x58 [ 63.288334][ T6629] el0_svc+0x54/0x168 [ 63.289421][ T6629] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xfc [ 63.290653][ T6629] el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 [ 63.291869][ T6629] [ 63.291869][ T6629] other info that might help us debug this: [ 63.291869][ T6629] [ 63.294231][ T6629] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 63.294231][ T6629] [ 63.295998][ T6629] CPU0 CPU1 [ 63.297228][ T6629] ---- ---- [ 63.298439][ T6629] lock(sk_lock-AF_SMC/1); [ 63.299507][ T6629] lock((work_completion)(&new_smc->smc_listen_work)); [ 63.301724][ T6629] lock(sk_lock-AF_SMC/1); [ 63.303412][ T6629] lock((work_completion)(&new_smc->smc_listen_work)); [ 63.304969][ T6629] [ 63.304969][ T6629] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 63.304969][ T6629] [ 63.306904][ T6629] 2 locks held by syz-executor.0/6629: [ 63.308082][ T6629] #0: ffff0000e71b2610 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#10){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: sock_close+0x80/0x1e8 [ 63.310331][ T6629] #1: ffff0000c8442d30 (sk_lock-AF_SMC/1){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: smc_release+0x1e8/0x528 [ 63.312528][ T6629] [ 63.312528][ T6629] stack backtrace: [ 63.313783][ T6629] CPU: 0 PID: 6629 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc7-syzkaller-00135-g707081b61156 #0 [ 63.316091][ T6629] Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 02/29/2024 [ 63.318433][ T6629] Call trace: [ 63.319113][ T6629] dump_backtrace+0x1b8/0x1e4 [ 63.320196][ T6629] show_stack+0x2c/0x3c [ 63.321086][ T6629] dump_stack_lvl+0xd0/0x124 [ 63.322243][ T6629] dump_stack+0x1c/0x28 [ 63.323127][ T6629] print_circular_bug+0x150/0x1b8 [ 63.324342][ T6629] check_noncircular+0x310/0x404 [ 63.325673][ T6629] __lock_acquire+0x3384/0x763c [ 63.326902][ T6629] lock_acquire+0x23c/0x71c [ 63.327884][ T6629] __flush_work+0xf8/0x1c0 [ 63.328971][ T6629] __cancel_work_timer+0x3e4/0x540 [ 63.330085][ T6629] cancel_work_sync+0x24/0x38 [ 63.331187][ T6629] smc_clcsock_release+0x64/0xec [ 63.332293][ T6629] __smc_release+0x55c/0x700 [ 63.333337][ T6629] smc_close_non_accepted+0xd8/0x260 [ 63.334630][ T6629] smc_close_active+0x9bc/0xd20 [ 63.335827][ T6629] __smc_release+0xa0/0x700 [ 63.336809][ T6629] smc_release+0x260/0x528 [ 63.337878][ T6629] sock_close+0xa4/0x1e8 [ 63.338880][ T6629] __fput+0x30c/0x738 [ 63.339835][ T6629] __fput_sync+0x60/0x9c [ 63.340818][ T6629] __arm64_sys_close+0x150/0x1e0 [ 63.341914][ T6629] invoke_syscall+0x98/0x2b8 [ 63.342995][ T6629] el0_svc_common+0x130/0x23c [ 63.344071][ T6629] do_el0_svc+0x48/0x58 [ 63.345024][ T6629] el0_svc+0x54/0x168 [ 63.346054][ T6629] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xfc [ 63.347104][ T6629] el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 [ 63.789033][ T5742] Bluetooth: hci0: command 0x0409 tx timeout [ 64.497470][ T2252] ieee802154 phy0 wpan0: encryption failed: -22 [ 64.499031][ T2252] ieee802154 phy1 wpan1: encryption failed: -22 [ 65.856349][ T5742] Bluetooth: hci0: command 0x041b tx timeout 1970/01/01 00:01:06 executed programs: 341 [ 67.946369][ T5742] Bluetooth: hci0: command 0x040f tx timeout [ 69.631599][ T1690] cfg80211: failed to load regulatory.db [ 70.016328][ T5742] Bluetooth: hci0: command 0x0419 tx timeout 1970/01/01 00:01:11 executed programs: 1010