reiserfs: enabling write barrier flush mode REISERFS (device loop0): Created .reiserfs_priv - reserved for xattr storage. ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.15.167-syzkaller #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz-executor.0/4387 is trying to acquire lock: ffff0000cce2f090 (&sbi->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: reiserfs_write_lock+0x7c/0xe8 fs/reiserfs/lock.c:27 but task is already holding lock: ffff0000e10a02e0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#8/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock_nested include/linux/fs.h:824 [inline] ffff0000e10a02e0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#8/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: do_unlinkat+0x2d0/0x830 fs/namei.c:4331 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#8/1){+.+.}-{3:3}: down_write_nested+0xc0/0x130 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1667 inode_lock_nested include/linux/fs.h:824 [inline] do_unlinkat+0x2d0/0x830 fs/namei.c:4331 __do_sys_unlinkat fs/namei.c:4391 [inline] __se_sys_unlinkat fs/namei.c:4384 [inline] __arm64_sys_unlinkat+0xcc/0xfc fs/namei.c:4384 __invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:38 [inline] invoke_syscall+0x98/0x2b8 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:52 el0_svc_common+0x138/0x258 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:142 do_el0_svc+0x58/0x14c arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:181 el0_svc+0x7c/0x1f0 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:608 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xe4 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:626 el0t_64_sync+0x1a0/0x1a4 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:584 -> #1 (sb_writers#12){.+.+}-{0:0}: percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline] __sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1811 [inline] sb_start_write+0xf0/0x3ac include/linux/fs.h:1881 mnt_want_write_file+0x64/0x1e8 fs/namespace.c:421 reiserfs_ioctl+0x188/0x4b8 fs/reiserfs/ioctl.c:103 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:874 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:860 [inline] __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x14c/0x1c8 fs/ioctl.c:860 __invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:38 [inline] invoke_syscall+0x98/0x2b8 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:52 el0_svc_common+0x138/0x258 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:142 do_el0_svc+0x58/0x14c arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:181 el0_svc+0x7c/0x1f0 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:608 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xe4 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:626 el0t_64_sync+0x1a0/0x1a4 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:584 -> #0 (&sbi->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3053 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3172 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3788 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x32d4/0x7638 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5012 lock_acquire+0x240/0x77c kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5623 __mutex_lock_common+0x194/0x2154 kernel/locking/mutex.c:596 __mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:729 [inline] mutex_lock_nested+0xa4/0xf8 kernel/locking/mutex.c:743 reiserfs_write_lock+0x7c/0xe8 fs/reiserfs/lock.c:27 reiserfs_lookup+0x130/0x3c4 fs/reiserfs/namei.c:364 lookup_one_qstr_excl+0x108/0x230 fs/namei.c:1563 do_unlinkat+0x2f0/0x830 fs/namei.c:4332 __do_sys_unlinkat fs/namei.c:4391 [inline] __se_sys_unlinkat fs/namei.c:4384 [inline] __arm64_sys_unlinkat+0xcc/0xfc fs/namei.c:4384 __invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:38 [inline] invoke_syscall+0x98/0x2b8 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:52 el0_svc_common+0x138/0x258 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:142 do_el0_svc+0x58/0x14c arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:181 el0_svc+0x7c/0x1f0 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:608 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xe4 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:626 el0t_64_sync+0x1a0/0x1a4 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:584 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &sbi->lock --> sb_writers#12 --> &type->i_mutex_dir_key#8/1 Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&type->i_mutex_dir_key#8/1); lock(sb_writers#12); lock(&type->i_mutex_dir_key#8/1); lock(&sbi->lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 2 locks held by syz-executor.0/4387: #0: ffff0000cd504460 (sb_writers#12){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write+0x44/0x9c fs/namespace.c:377 #1: ffff0000e10a02e0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#8/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock_nested include/linux/fs.h:824 [inline] #1: ffff0000e10a02e0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#8/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: do_unlinkat+0x2d0/0x830 fs/namei.c:4331 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 4387 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 5.15.167-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 08/06/2024 Call trace: dump_backtrace+0x0/0x530 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:152 show_stack+0x2c/0x3c arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:216 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x108/0x170 lib/dump_stack.c:106 dump_stack+0x1c/0x58 lib/dump_stack.c:113 print_circular_bug+0x150/0x1b8 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2011 check_noncircular+0x2cc/0x378 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2133 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3053 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3172 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3788 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x32d4/0x7638 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5012 lock_acquire+0x240/0x77c kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5623 __mutex_lock_common+0x194/0x2154 kernel/locking/mutex.c:596 __mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:729 [inline] mutex_lock_nested+0xa4/0xf8 kernel/locking/mutex.c:743 reiserfs_write_lock+0x7c/0xe8 fs/reiserfs/lock.c:27 reiserfs_lookup+0x130/0x3c4 fs/reiserfs/namei.c:364 lookup_one_qstr_excl+0x108/0x230 fs/namei.c:1563 do_unlinkat+0x2f0/0x830 fs/namei.c:4332 __do_sys_unlinkat fs/namei.c:4391 [inline] __se_sys_unlinkat fs/namei.c:4384 [inline] __arm64_sys_unlinkat+0xcc/0xfc fs/namei.c:4384 __invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:38 [inline] invoke_syscall+0x98/0x2b8 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:52 el0_svc_common+0x138/0x258 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:142 do_el0_svc+0x58/0x14c arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:181 el0_svc+0x7c/0x1f0 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:608 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xe4 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:626 el0t_64_sync+0x1a0/0x1a4 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:584