REISERFS (device loop0): checking transaction log (loop0) REISERFS (device loop0): Using r5 hash to sort names reiserfs: enabling write barrier flush mode REISERFS (device loop0): Created .reiserfs_priv - reserved for xattr storage. ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.15.182-syzkaller #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz.0.15/5169 is trying to acquire lock: ffffc900031a10f0 (&journal->j_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: reiserfs_mutex_lock_safe fs/reiserfs/reiserfs.h:814 [inline] ffffc900031a10f0 (&journal->j_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_journal fs/reiserfs/journal.c:534 [inline] ffffc900031a10f0 (&journal->j_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: do_journal_begin_r+0x37a/0x1010 fs/reiserfs/journal.c:3045 but task is already holding lock: ffff888074320460 (sb_writers#13){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write_file+0x5c/0x200 fs/namespace.c:421 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (sb_writers#13){.+.+}-{0:0}: percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline] __sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1811 [inline] sb_start_write+0x4f/0x1c0 include/linux/fs.h:1881 mnt_want_write_file+0x5c/0x200 fs/namespace.c:421 reiserfs_ioctl+0x10a/0x330 fs/reiserfs/ioctl.c:103 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:874 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xfa/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:860 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x4c/0xa0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x66/0xd0 -> #1 (&sbi->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock_common+0x1eb/0x2390 kernel/locking/mutex.c:596 __mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:729 [inline] mutex_lock_nested+0x17/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:743 reiserfs_write_lock_nested+0x5c/0xd0 fs/reiserfs/lock.c:78 reiserfs_mutex_lock_safe fs/reiserfs/reiserfs.h:815 [inline] lock_journal fs/reiserfs/journal.c:534 [inline] do_journal_begin_r+0x385/0x1010 fs/reiserfs/journal.c:3045 journal_begin+0x148/0x350 fs/reiserfs/journal.c:3253 reiserfs_remount+0xc8f/0x1480 fs/reiserfs/super.c:1561 reconfigure_super+0x219/0x880 fs/super.c:938 do_remount fs/namespace.c:2669 [inline] path_mount+0xd3e/0x1020 fs/namespace.c:3335 do_mount fs/namespace.c:3356 [inline] __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3564 [inline] __se_sys_mount+0x2d6/0x3c0 fs/namespace.c:3541 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x4c/0xa0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x66/0xd0 -> #0 (&journal->j_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3053 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3172 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3788 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x2c33/0x7c60 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5012 lock_acquire+0x197/0x3f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5623 __mutex_lock_common+0x1eb/0x2390 kernel/locking/mutex.c:596 __mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:729 [inline] mutex_lock_nested+0x17/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:743 reiserfs_mutex_lock_safe fs/reiserfs/reiserfs.h:814 [inline] lock_journal fs/reiserfs/journal.c:534 [inline] do_journal_begin_r+0x37a/0x1010 fs/reiserfs/journal.c:3045 journal_begin+0x148/0x350 fs/reiserfs/journal.c:3253 reiserfs_dirty_inode+0x119/0x240 fs/reiserfs/super.c:710 __mark_inode_dirty+0x2b0/0xc60 fs/fs-writeback.c:2464 mark_inode_dirty include/linux/fs.h:2467 [inline] reiserfs_ioctl+0x286/0x330 fs/reiserfs/ioctl.c:111 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:874 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xfa/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:860 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x4c/0xa0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x66/0xd0 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &journal->j_mutex --> &sbi->lock --> sb_writers#13 Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(sb_writers#13); lock(&sbi->lock); lock(sb_writers#13); lock(&journal->j_mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by syz.0.15/5169: #0: ffff888074320460 (sb_writers#13){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write_file+0x5c/0x200 fs/namespace.c:421 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 5169 Comm: syz.0.15 Not tainted 5.15.182-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 04/19/2025 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x168/0x230 lib/dump_stack.c:106 check_noncircular+0x274/0x310 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2133 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3053 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3172 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3788 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x2c33/0x7c60 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5012 lock_acquire+0x197/0x3f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5623 __mutex_lock_common+0x1eb/0x2390 kernel/locking/mutex.c:596 __mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:729 [inline] mutex_lock_nested+0x17/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:743 reiserfs_mutex_lock_safe fs/reiserfs/reiserfs.h:814 [inline] lock_journal fs/reiserfs/journal.c:534 [inline] do_journal_begin_r+0x37a/0x1010 fs/reiserfs/journal.c:3045 journal_begin+0x148/0x350 fs/reiserfs/journal.c:3253 reiserfs_dirty_inode+0x119/0x240 fs/reiserfs/super.c:710 __mark_inode_dirty+0x2b0/0xc60 fs/fs-writeback.c:2464 mark_inode_dirty include/linux/fs.h:2467 [inline] reiserfs_ioctl+0x286/0x330 fs/reiserfs/ioctl.c:111 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:874 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xfa/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:860 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x4c/0xa0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x66/0xd0 RIP: 0033:0x7f0562a09ed9 Code: ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 a8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007f0561c88058 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f0562bcffa0 RCX: 00007f0562a09ed9 RDX: 0000000020000080 RSI: 0000000040087602 RDI: 0000000000000005 RBP: 00007f0562a7dcc8 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007f0562bcffa0 R15: 00007ffd7e984978