======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
syzkaller #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz.0.6203/23074 is trying to acquire lock:
ffffffff96eb1d48 (&obj_hash[i].lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: __debug_check_no_obj_freed lib/debugobjects.c:968 [inline]
ffffffff96eb1d48 (&obj_hash[i].lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: debug_check_no_obj_freed+0x136/0x530 lib/debugobjects.c:1009

but task is already holding lock:
ffff888033433a38 (&trie->lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: trie_update_elem+0xc7/0xe80 kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c:335

which lock already depends on the new lock.


the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #1 (&trie->lock){-.-.}-{2:2}:
       __raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:110 [inline]
       _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0xb0/0x100 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:162
       trie_delete_elem+0x90/0x690 kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c:467
       0xffffffffa000256a
       bpf_dispatcher_nop_func include/linux/bpf.h:1012 [inline]
       __bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:596 [inline]
       bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:614 [inline]
       __bpf_trace_run kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2285 [inline]
       bpf_trace_run2+0x312/0x3e0 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2324
       __traceiter_contention_end+0x74/0xa0 include/trace/events/lock.h:122
       trace_contention_end+0x13f/0x190 include/trace/events/lock.h:122
       __pv_queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x7e8/0x9c0 kernel/locking/qspinlock.c:560
       pv_queued_spin_lock_slowpath arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h:591 [inline]
       queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x43/0x50 arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h:51
       queued_spin_lock include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h:114 [inline]
       do_raw_spin_lock+0x265/0x2f0 kernel/locking/spinlock_debug.c:115
       __raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:111 [inline]
       _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0xbc/0x100 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:162
       __debug_check_no_obj_freed lib/debugobjects.c:968 [inline]
       debug_check_no_obj_freed+0x136/0x530 lib/debugobjects.c:1009
       slab_free_hook mm/slub.c:1704 [inline]
       slab_free_freelist_hook+0xd2/0x1a0 mm/slub.c:1755
       slab_free mm/slub.c:3687 [inline]
       kmem_cache_free+0xf7/0x290 mm/slub.c:3709
       kfree_skb include/linux/skbuff.h:1220 [inline]
       ieee80211_iface_work+0x7b3/0xc80 net/mac80211/iface.c:1735
       process_one_work+0x8a2/0x1160 kernel/workqueue.c:2292
       worker_thread+0xaa2/0x1270 kernel/workqueue.c:2439
       kthread+0x29d/0x330 kernel/kthread.c:376
       ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:295

-> #0 (&obj_hash[i].lock){-.-.}-{2:2}:
       check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3090 [inline]
       check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3209 [inline]
       validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3825 [inline]
       __lock_acquire+0x2d07/0x7d10 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5049
       lock_acquire+0x1bb/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5662
       __raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:110 [inline]
       _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0xb0/0x100 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:162
       __debug_check_no_obj_freed lib/debugobjects.c:968 [inline]
       debug_check_no_obj_freed+0x136/0x530 lib/debugobjects.c:1009
       slab_free_hook mm/slub.c:1704 [inline]
       slab_free_freelist_hook+0xd2/0x1a0 mm/slub.c:1755
       slab_free mm/slub.c:3687 [inline]
       __kmem_cache_free+0xb6/0x1f0 mm/slub.c:3700
       trie_update_elem+0x6bf/0xe80 kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c:444
       bpf_map_update_value+0x59e/0x670 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:228
       generic_map_update_batch+0x54b/0x810 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:1709
       bpf_map_do_batch+0x466/0x600 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:-1
       __sys_bpf+0x6f7/0x780 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:-1
       __do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5134 [inline]
       __se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5132 [inline]
       __x64_sys_bpf+0x78/0x90 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5132
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0x4c/0xa0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:76
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x68/0xd2

other info that might help us debug this:

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(&trie->lock);
                               lock(&obj_hash[i].lock);
                               lock(&trie->lock);
  lock(&obj_hash[i].lock);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

2 locks held by syz.0.6203/23074:
 #0: ffffffff8cb2b2a0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:350 [inline]
 #0: ffffffff8cb2b2a0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:791 [inline]
 #0: ffffffff8cb2b2a0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: bpf_map_update_value+0x375/0x670 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:227
 #1: ffff888033433a38 (&trie->lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: trie_update_elem+0xc7/0xe80 kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c:335

stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 23074 Comm: syz.0.6203 Not tainted syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/25/2025
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 dump_stack_lvl+0x188/0x24e lib/dump_stack.c:106
 check_noncircular+0x296/0x330 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2170
 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3090 [inline]
 check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3209 [inline]
 validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3825 [inline]
 __lock_acquire+0x2d07/0x7d10 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5049
 lock_acquire+0x1bb/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5662
 __raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:110 [inline]
 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0xb0/0x100 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:162
 __debug_check_no_obj_freed lib/debugobjects.c:968 [inline]
 debug_check_no_obj_freed+0x136/0x530 lib/debugobjects.c:1009
 slab_free_hook mm/slub.c:1704 [inline]
 slab_free_freelist_hook+0xd2/0x1a0 mm/slub.c:1755
 slab_free mm/slub.c:3687 [inline]
 __kmem_cache_free+0xb6/0x1f0 mm/slub.c:3700
 trie_update_elem+0x6bf/0xe80 kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c:444
 bpf_map_update_value+0x59e/0x670 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:228
 generic_map_update_batch+0x54b/0x810 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:1709
 bpf_map_do_batch+0x466/0x600 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:-1
 __sys_bpf+0x6f7/0x780 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:-1
 __do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5134 [inline]
 __se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5132 [inline]
 __x64_sys_bpf+0x78/0x90 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5132
 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46 [inline]
 do_syscall_64+0x4c/0xa0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:76
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x68/0xd2
RIP: 0033:0x7f6dbb19acb9
Code: ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 e8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007f6dbc047028 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000141
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f6dbb415fa0 RCX: 00007f6dbb19acb9
RDX: 0000000000000038 RSI: 0000200000000240 RDI: 000000000000001a
RBP: 00007f6dbb208bf7 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 00007f6dbb416038 R14: 00007f6dbb415fa0 R15: 00007ffebe7f0798
 </TASK>
netlink: 'syz.0.6203': attribute type 9 has an invalid length.
netlink: 126588 bytes leftover after parsing attributes in process `syz.0.6203'.