Title | Replies (including bot) | Last reply |
---|---|---|
[syzbot] [netfs?] possible deadlock in netfs_writepages | 0 (1) | 2024/08/25 04:18 |
syzbot |
sign-in | mailing list | source | docs |
Title | Replies (including bot) | Last reply |
---|---|---|
[syzbot] [netfs?] possible deadlock in netfs_writepages | 0 (1) | 2024/08/25 04:18 |
fuse: Unknown parameter 'ratmode' ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.11.0-rc4-syzkaller-00011-g521b1e7f4cf0 #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz.0.1984/12860 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888028a511e0 (&ctx->wb_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: netfs_writepages+0x5e1/0xdd0 fs/netfs/write_issue.c:509 but task is already holding lock: ffff88801d5b9e18 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: mmap_write_lock include/linux/mmap_lock.h:106 [inline] ffff88801d5b9e18 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: exit_mmap+0x1fa/0xb20 mm/mmap.c:3420 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}: down_read_killable+0x9d/0x380 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1549 mmap_read_lock_killable include/linux/mmap_lock.h:153 [inline] get_mmap_lock_carefully mm/memory.c:5878 [inline] lock_mm_and_find_vma+0x3a9/0x6a0 mm/memory.c:5929 do_user_addr_fault+0x2b5/0x13f0 arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1361 handle_page_fault arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1481 [inline] exc_page_fault+0x5c/0xc0 arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1539 asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30 arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:623 fault_in_readable+0x126/0x230 mm/gup.c:2244 fault_in_iov_iter_readable+0x101/0x2c0 lib/iov_iter.c:94 netfs_perform_write+0x3ef/0x2250 fs/netfs/buffered_write.c:240 netfs_buffered_write_iter_locked+0x213/0x2c0 fs/netfs/buffered_write.c:470 netfs_file_write_iter+0x1e0/0x470 fs/netfs/buffered_write.c:509 v9fs_file_write_iter+0xa1/0x100 fs/9p/vfs_file.c:407 aio_write+0x3c1/0x8e0 fs/aio.c:1633 __io_submit_one fs/aio.c:2005 [inline] io_submit_one+0x124e/0x1db0 fs/aio.c:2052 __do_compat_sys_io_submit fs/aio.c:2153 [inline] __se_compat_sys_io_submit fs/aio.c:2123 [inline] __ia32_compat_sys_io_submit+0x1af/0x390 fs/aio.c:2123 do_syscall_32_irqs_on arch/x86/entry/common.c:165 [inline] __do_fast_syscall_32+0x73/0x120 arch/x86/entry/common.c:386 do_fast_syscall_32+0x32/0x80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:411 entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x84/0x8e -> #0 (&ctx->wb_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3133 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3252 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3868 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x24ed/0x3cb0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5142 lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5759 [inline] lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x560 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5724 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x175/0x9c0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752 netfs_writepages+0x5e1/0xdd0 fs/netfs/write_issue.c:509 do_writepages+0x1a3/0x7f0 mm/page-writeback.c:2683 filemap_fdatawrite_wbc mm/filemap.c:397 [inline] filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x148/0x1c0 mm/filemap.c:387 v9fs_mmap_vm_close+0x213/0x260 fs/9p/vfs_file.c:502 remove_vma+0x8b/0x180 mm/mmap.c:182 exit_mmap+0x4d4/0xb20 mm/mmap.c:3436 __mmput+0x12a/0x480 kernel/fork.c:1345 mmput+0x62/0x70 kernel/fork.c:1367 exit_mm kernel/exit.c:571 [inline] do_exit+0x9bf/0x2bb0 kernel/exit.c:869 do_group_exit+0xd3/0x2a0 kernel/exit.c:1031 get_signal+0x265a/0x26e0 kernel/signal.c:2917 arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x90/0x7e0 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:310 exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:111 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/entry-common.h:328 [inline] __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:207 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x150/0x2a0 kernel/entry/common.c:218 __do_fast_syscall_32+0x80/0x120 arch/x86/entry/common.c:389 do_fast_syscall_32+0x32/0x80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:411 entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x84/0x8e other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&mm->mmap_lock); lock(&ctx->wb_lock); lock(&mm->mmap_lock); lock(&ctx->wb_lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by syz.0.1984/12860: #0: ffff88801d5b9e18 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: mmap_write_lock include/linux/mmap_lock.h:106 [inline] #0: ffff88801d5b9e18 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: exit_mmap+0x1fa/0xb20 mm/mmap.c:3420 stack backtrace: CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 12860 Comm: syz.0.1984 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc4-syzkaller-00011-g521b1e7f4cf0 #0 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:93 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x116/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:119 check_noncircular+0x31a/0x400 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2186 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3133 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3252 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3868 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x24ed/0x3cb0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5142 lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5759 [inline] lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x560 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5724 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x175/0x9c0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752 netfs_writepages+0x5e1/0xdd0 fs/netfs/write_issue.c:509 do_writepages+0x1a3/0x7f0 mm/page-writeback.c:2683 filemap_fdatawrite_wbc mm/filemap.c:397 [inline] filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x148/0x1c0 mm/filemap.c:387 v9fs_mmap_vm_close+0x213/0x260 fs/9p/vfs_file.c:502 remove_vma+0x8b/0x180 mm/mmap.c:182 exit_mmap+0x4d4/0xb20 mm/mmap.c:3436 __mmput+0x12a/0x480 kernel/fork.c:1345 mmput+0x62/0x70 kernel/fork.c:1367 exit_mm kernel/exit.c:571 [inline] do_exit+0x9bf/0x2bb0 kernel/exit.c:869 do_group_exit+0xd3/0x2a0 kernel/exit.c:1031 get_signal+0x265a/0x26e0 kernel/signal.c:2917 arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x90/0x7e0 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:310 exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:111 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/entry-common.h:328 [inline] __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:207 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x150/0x2a0 kernel/entry/common.c:218 __do_fast_syscall_32+0x80/0x120 arch/x86/entry/common.c:389 do_fast_syscall_32+0x32/0x80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:411 entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x84/0x8e RIP: 0023:0xf7f31579 Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at 0xf7f3154f. RSP: 002b:00000000f56d660c EFLAGS: 00000296 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000f0 RAX: fffffffffffffe00 RBX: 00000000f73f4f88 RCX: 0000000000000080 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 00000000f73f4f8c RBP: 0000000000000081 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 </TASK>
Time | Kernel | Commit | Syzkaller | Config | Log | Report | Syz repro | C repro | VM info | Assets (help?) | Manager | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024/08/21 04:16 | upstream | 521b1e7f4cf0 | 9f0ab3fb | .config | console log | report | info | [disk image (non-bootable)] [vmlinux] [kernel image] | ci-qemu-upstream-386 | possible deadlock in netfs_writepages |