======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.2.0-rc7-syzkaller-00013-g513c1a3d3f19 #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor.0/27531 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff888031e54520 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#8){++++}-{3:3}, at: vfs_rename+0x797/0x1190
but task is already holding lock:
ffff888031e537e0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#8/2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_rename+0x172/0x1a0
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #2 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#8/2){+.+.}-{3:3}:
lock_acquire+0x20b/0x600
down_write_nested+0x3d/0x60
delete_one_xattr+0x106/0x2f0
reiserfs_for_each_xattr+0x9b0/0xb50
reiserfs_delete_xattrs+0x1f/0x90
reiserfs_evict_inode+0x207/0x470
evict+0x2a4/0x620
__dentry_kill+0x436/0x650
dentry_kill+0xbb/0x290
dput+0x1d8/0x3f0
ovl_create_or_link+0x10aa/0x1480
ovl_create_object+0x246/0x370
vfs_mkdir+0x3ba/0x590
do_mkdirat+0x237/0x4f0
__x64_sys_mkdir+0x6e/0x80
do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
-> #1
(&type->i_mutex_dir_key#8/3){+.+.}-{3:3}:
lock_acquire+0x20b/0x600
down_write_nested+0x3d/0x60
open_xa_dir+0x122/0x650
xattr_lookup+0x24/0x280
reiserfs_xattr_set_handle+0xfd/0xdc0
reiserfs_xattr_set+0x428/0x550
__vfs_setxattr+0x460/0x4a0
__vfs_setxattr_noperm+0x12e/0x5e0
vfs_setxattr+0x221/0x420
ovl_get_workdir+0xcf6/0x16c0
ovl_fill_super+0x1b8a/0x29c0
mount_nodev+0x56/0xe0
legacy_get_tree+0xef/0x190
vfs_get_tree+0x8c/0x270
do_new_mount+0x28f/0xae0
__se_sys_mount+0x2c9/0x3b0
do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
-> #0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#8){++++}-{3:3}:
validate_chain+0x166b/0x5860
__lock_acquire+0x125b/0x1f80
lock_acquire+0x20b/0x600
down_write+0x3a/0x60
vfs_rename+0x797/0x1190
do_renameat2+0xa70/0x1250
__x64_sys_rename+0x86/0x90
do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
&type->i_mutex_dir_key#8 --> &type->i_mutex_dir_key#8/3 --> &type->i_mutex_dir_key#8/2
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&type->i_mutex_dir_key#8/2);
lock(&type->i_mutex_dir_key#8/3);
lock(&type->i_mutex_dir_key#8/2);
lock(&type->i_mutex_dir_key#8);
*** DEADLOCK ***
4 locks held by syz-executor.0/27531:
#0: ffff888076010460 (sb_writers#14){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write+0x3f/0x90
#1: ffff888076010748 (&type->s_vfs_rename_key#2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_rename+0x58/0x1a0
#2: ffff888031e57a20 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#8/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_rename+0xa4/0x1a0
#3: ffff888031e537e0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#8/2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_rename+0x172/0x1a0
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 27531 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 6.2.0-rc7-syzkaller-00013-g513c1a3d3f19 #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/12/2023
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x1b5/0x2a0
check_noncircular+0x2d1/0x390
validate_chain+0x166b/0x5860
__lock_acquire+0x125b/0x1f80
lock_acquire+0x20b/0x600
down_write+0x3a/0x60
vfs_rename+0x797/0x1190
do_renameat2+0xa70/0x1250
__x64_sys_rename+0x86/0x90
do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
RIP: 0033:0x7f79b8a8c0f9
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 f1 19 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007f79b9895168 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000052
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f79b8bac120 RCX: 00007f79b8a8c0f9
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00000000200001c0 RDI: 0000000020000140
RBP: 00007f79b8ae7ae9 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 00007ffc65f77eaf R14: 00007f79b9895300 R15: 0000000000022000
</TASK>