syzbot |
sign-in | mailing list | source | docs |
| Kernel | Title | Repro | Cause bisect | Fix bisect | Count | Last | Reported | Patched | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| upstream | possible deadlock in nr_rt_device_down (3) hams | 1 | 8d18h | 4d18h | 0/28 | upstream: reported on 2024/09/14 18:32 | |||
| linux-5.15 | possible deadlock in nr_rt_device_down origin:upstream | C | error | 2 | 130d | 130d | 0/3 | upstream: reported C repro on 2024/05/12 01:54 |
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.10.0-syzkaller-12562-g1722389b0d86 #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz.0.2901/14000 is trying to acquire lock:
ffffffff8fbdbcd8 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]
ffffffff8fbdbcd8 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_rt_device_down+0xb5/0x7b0 net/netrom/nr_route.c:517
but task is already holding lock:
ffffffff8fbdbc78 (nr_neigh_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]
ffffffff8fbdbc78 (nr_neigh_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_rt_device_down+0x28/0x7b0 net/netrom/nr_route.c:514
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #2 (nr_neigh_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}:
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5759
__raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:126 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_bh+0x35/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:178
spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]
nr_remove_neigh net/netrom/nr_route.c:307 [inline]
nr_dec_obs net/netrom/nr_route.c:472 [inline]
nr_rt_ioctl+0x398/0xfb0 net/netrom/nr_route.c:692
sock_do_ioctl+0x158/0x460 net/socket.c:1222
sock_ioctl+0x629/0x8e0 net/socket.c:1341
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:907 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl+0xfc/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:893
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
-> #1 (&nr_node->node_lock){+...}-{2:2}:
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5759
__raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:126 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_bh+0x35/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:178
spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]
nr_node_lock include/net/netrom.h:152 [inline]
nr_dec_obs net/netrom/nr_route.c:459 [inline]
nr_rt_ioctl+0x192/0xfb0 net/netrom/nr_route.c:692
sock_do_ioctl+0x158/0x460 net/socket.c:1222
sock_ioctl+0x629/0x8e0 net/socket.c:1341
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:907 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl+0xfc/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:893
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
-> #0 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3133 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3252 [inline]
validate_chain+0x18e0/0x5900 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3868
__lock_acquire+0x137a/0x2040 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5142
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5759
__raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:126 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_bh+0x35/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:178
spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]
nr_rt_device_down+0xb5/0x7b0 net/netrom/nr_route.c:517
nr_device_event+0x134/0x150 net/netrom/af_netrom.c:126
notifier_call_chain+0x19f/0x3e0 kernel/notifier.c:93
__dev_notify_flags+0x207/0x400
dev_change_flags+0xf0/0x1a0 net/core/dev.c:8914
dev_ifsioc+0x7c8/0xe70 net/core/dev_ioctl.c:527
dev_ioctl+0x719/0x1340 net/core/dev_ioctl.c:784
sock_do_ioctl+0x240/0x460 net/socket.c:1236
sock_ioctl+0x629/0x8e0 net/socket.c:1341
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:907 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl+0xfc/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:893
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
nr_node_list_lock --> &nr_node->node_lock --> nr_neigh_list_lock
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(nr_neigh_list_lock);
lock(&nr_node->node_lock);
lock(nr_neigh_list_lock);
lock(nr_node_list_lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
2 locks held by syz.0.2901/14000:
#0: ffffffff8fa7f788 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: dev_ioctl+0x706/0x1340 net/core/dev_ioctl.c:783
#1: ffffffff8fbdbc78 (nr_neigh_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]
#1: ffffffff8fbdbc78 (nr_neigh_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_rt_device_down+0x28/0x7b0 net/netrom/nr_route.c:514
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 14000 Comm: syz.0.2901 Not tainted 6.10.0-syzkaller-12562-g1722389b0d86 #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 06/27/2024
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:93 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:119
check_noncircular+0x36a/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2186
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3133 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3252 [inline]
validate_chain+0x18e0/0x5900 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3868
__lock_acquire+0x137a/0x2040 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5142
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5759
__raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:126 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_bh+0x35/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:178
spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]
nr_rt_device_down+0xb5/0x7b0 net/netrom/nr_route.c:517
nr_device_event+0x134/0x150 net/netrom/af_netrom.c:126
notifier_call_chain+0x19f/0x3e0 kernel/notifier.c:93
__dev_notify_flags+0x207/0x400
dev_change_flags+0xf0/0x1a0 net/core/dev.c:8914
dev_ifsioc+0x7c8/0xe70 net/core/dev_ioctl.c:527
dev_ioctl+0x719/0x1340 net/core/dev_ioctl.c:784
sock_do_ioctl+0x240/0x460 net/socket.c:1236
sock_ioctl+0x629/0x8e0 net/socket.c:1341
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:907 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl+0xfc/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:893
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7f7784377299
Code: ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 a8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007f77850d3048 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f7784506130 RCX: 00007f7784377299
RDX: 0000000020000000 RSI: 0000000000008914 RDI: 0000000000000004
RBP: 00007f77843e48e6 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 000000000000006e R14: 00007f7784506130 R15: 00007ffd379f78c8
</TASK>
| Time | Kernel | Commit | Syzkaller | Config | Log | Report | Syz repro | C repro | VM info | Assets (help?) | Manager | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024/07/27 01:45 | net-next | 1722389b0d86 | 46eb10b7 | .config | console log | report | info | [disk image] [vmlinux] [kernel image] | ci-upstream-net-kasan-gce | possible deadlock in nr_rt_device_down | ||
| 2024/07/27 01:42 | net-next | 1722389b0d86 | 46eb10b7 | .config | console log | report | info | [disk image] [vmlinux] [kernel image] | ci-upstream-net-kasan-gce | possible deadlock in nr_rt_device_down |